Average After-Call Work Time (AACW) is a critical performance indicator that reflects the efficiency of customer service operations.
It directly influences operational efficiency, customer satisfaction, and resource allocation.
A lower AACW often correlates with quicker resolution times and improved customer experiences, while higher values can indicate process bottlenecks.
Organizations that effectively manage this metric can enhance their overall business outcomes, driving better financial health and strategic alignment.
By leveraging analytical insights from reporting dashboards, companies can make data-driven decisions that optimize workforce productivity and reduce costs.
High AACW values suggest inefficiencies in post-call processes, potentially leading to customer dissatisfaction. Conversely, low values indicate streamlined operations and effective issue resolution. Ideal targets typically fall within a range that balances thoroughness with efficiency.
We have 5 relevant benchmarks in our benchmarks database.
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | minutes per call | range | calls in healthcare contact centers | healthcare |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | minutes per call | range | calls in retail contact centers | retail |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent of shift time | range | call center agents | cross‑industry |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | seconds | average | agents in call centers | cross‑industry |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | seconds per interaction | range | call center interactions | cross‑industry |
Many organizations overlook the impact of after-call work on customer satisfaction, leading to inefficiencies that can erode trust.
Enhancing AACW requires a focused approach on process optimization and technology integration.
A leading telecommunications provider faced challenges with its Average After-Call Work Time, which had risen to an average of 12 minutes. This inefficiency was impacting customer satisfaction scores and increasing operational costs. To address this, the company initiated a project called "Call Efficiency," aimed at reducing AACW through process reengineering and technology upgrades. The project involved implementing a new CRM system that integrated call notes and customer data, allowing agents to complete after-call tasks more efficiently.
Within 6 months, the company reduced its AACW to 7 minutes, significantly improving customer satisfaction ratings. The new system also provided agents with real-time access to customer history, enabling them to resolve issues more quickly during calls. As a result, the company saw a 20% increase in first-call resolution rates, further enhancing customer loyalty.
The success of the "Call Efficiency" initiative led to a broader cultural shift within the organization, emphasizing the importance of operational efficiency and data-driven decision-making. Management began to regularly review AACW alongside other key performance indicators, ensuring ongoing focus on continuous improvement. This strategic alignment not only improved financial health but also positioned the company as a leader in customer service excellence.
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.
The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.
When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.
Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.
Got a question? Email us at [email protected].
A good AACW typically falls below 5 minutes, indicating efficient post-call processes. Values between 5 and 10 minutes are acceptable but warrant monitoring for potential improvements.
Technology can automate repetitive tasks and streamline workflows, significantly reducing the time agents spend on after-call work. Integrating CRM systems with call handling tools allows for quicker data entry and retrieval.
Lower AACW values often correlate with faster issue resolution, enhancing the overall customer experience. Customers appreciate prompt follow-ups, which can lead to higher satisfaction and loyalty.
Regular reviews, ideally on a monthly basis, help identify trends and areas for improvement. Frequent monitoring allows organizations to respond quickly to any emerging issues.
Yes, higher AACW can lead to increased operational costs due to longer handling times and reduced agent productivity. Streamlining after-call processes can help control these costs.
Effective training equips agents with the skills and knowledge needed to handle post-call tasks efficiently. Regular training sessions can also address any new tools or processes implemented.
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected
NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)