Average Handling Time (AHT) is a critical performance indicator that measures the efficiency of customer interactions.
It directly influences customer satisfaction, operational efficiency, and overall financial health.
AHT reflects how effectively a business manages its resources while addressing customer needs.
Reducing AHT can lead to improved service levels and lower operational costs.
Organizations that actively track this metric can make data-driven decisions that enhance their service delivery.
Ultimately, optimizing AHT contributes to better business outcomes and strategic alignment with corporate goals.
High AHT values often indicate inefficiencies in customer service processes, leading to increased costs and customer frustration. Conversely, low AHT values suggest streamlined operations and effective resolution of customer inquiries. Ideal targets typically fall within a range that balances efficiency and quality of service.
We have 6 relevant benchmarks in our benchmarks database.
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | minutes seconds | average by industry | calls | multiple industries |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | minutes | range | calls | many call centers |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | minutes seconds | average | calls | healthcare call centers |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | minutes | average | calls | insurance call centers |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | minutes | industry standard average | customer service calls | call centers | North America | over 500 leading North American call centers |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | minutes | average | calls | cross‑industry |
Many organizations overlook the nuances of AHT, focusing solely on the number rather than the quality of customer interactions.
Improving AHT requires a strategic focus on both process efficiency and employee performance.
A leading telecommunications provider faced challenges with its Average Handling Time (AHT), which had climbed to 12 minutes, impacting customer satisfaction scores. Recognizing the urgency, the company initiated a comprehensive review of its customer service operations. A cross-functional team was formed to analyze call data and identify key pain points contributing to the lengthy handling times.
The team discovered that a significant number of calls were related to billing inquiries, which often took longer due to unclear processes. To address this, the company implemented a new billing system that simplified customer queries and provided agents with real-time access to account information. Additionally, they introduced a dedicated training program focused on common customer issues, equipping agents with the tools needed to resolve inquiries more efficiently.
Within 6 months, the company reduced its AHT from 12 minutes to 8 minutes, resulting in a notable increase in customer satisfaction ratings. The streamlined processes not only improved handling times but also enhanced the overall customer experience. As a result, the company saw a 15% increase in customer retention rates, demonstrating the direct correlation between AHT improvement and business outcomes.
The success of this initiative led to further investments in technology and training, positioning the company as a leader in customer service within the telecommunications industry. By continuously monitoring AHT and making data-driven adjustments, the organization ensured its operations remained aligned with customer expectations and business goals.
Trusted by organizations worldwide, KPI Depot is the most comprehensive KPI database available.
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.
The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.
When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.
Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.
Got a question? Email us at [email protected].
Several factors can impact AHT, including call complexity, agent experience, and the efficiency of support systems. High call volumes can also strain resources, leading to longer handling times.
Technology solutions, such as automated systems and AI chatbots, can streamline customer interactions. These tools can handle routine inquiries, allowing agents to focus on more complex issues, thus reducing AHT.
Not necessarily. While lower AHT can indicate efficiency, it should not come at the expense of service quality. Balancing AHT with customer satisfaction is crucial for long-term success.
Regular reviews, ideally on a monthly basis, help organizations identify trends and areas for improvement. Frequent monitoring ensures that any issues are addressed promptly.
Yes, different departments may have varying AHT benchmarks based on the nature of their interactions. For example, technical support may naturally have longer handling times than general inquiries.
Effective training equips agents with the skills needed to resolve issues quickly and accurately. Well-trained staff can significantly reduce AHT while enhancing customer satisfaction.
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected
NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)