Average Resolution Rate is a critical KPI that measures the effectiveness of customer service in resolving issues promptly.
High resolution rates correlate with enhanced customer satisfaction, retention, and loyalty, directly impacting revenue growth.
Companies that excel in this metric often experience improved operational efficiency and stronger financial health.
By tracking results against target thresholds, organizations can identify areas for improvement and align their strategies accordingly.
This KPI serves as a leading indicator of overall performance, making it essential for management reporting and data-driven decision-making.
Average Resolution Rate sits in KPI Depot's Omni-channel Support KPI group at priority twenty-seven, below the group's lead measures of experience and effectiveness, Customer Satisfaction Score, First Contact Resolution Rate, and Customer Effort Score. Its balanced scorecard perspective is internal process, and it reads the share of reported issues that get resolved across all channels.
The tension is with the quality metrics ranked above it. A resolution rate rises whenever tickets are closed, and closing is not the same as solving: an issue marked resolved that the customer reopens, or one resolved slowly after much effort, still counts as a win here while First Contact Resolution Rate and Customer Effort Score fall. Read Average Resolution Rate against First Contact Resolution and the satisfaction measures, because a high resolution rate paired with weak first-contact resolution usually means issues are being closed and reopened rather than fixed once. The group's ordering, with experience metrics first, is a reminder that resolution volume is not the goal on its own.
The formula is issues resolved over issues reported, and the honest work is defining both an issue and a resolution. One customer problem can arrive as several tickets across email, chat, and phone, so without merging duplicates the denominator inflates and the rate understates true performance. Decide the deduplication rule first.
Resolution is the harder term. Fix whether a resolution requires customer confirmation or just an agent closing the ticket, and how reopens are treated, because counting a reopened issue as resolved is the most common way this rate is inflated. Separate resolution rate from resolution time, since a channel can post a high rate by resolving slowly, and read the two together. Segment by channel and issue type, because a blended cross-channel rate hides a weak channel behind a strong one, and pair the metric with First Contact Resolution and a satisfaction measure, so closing volume is never optimized at the cost of the fix.
Many organizations overlook the nuances of Average Resolution Rate, leading to misguided strategies that fail to address root causes of customer dissatisfaction.
Enhancing Average Resolution Rate requires a multifaceted approach focused on process optimization and staff empowerment.
We have 6 relevant benchmarks in our benchmarks database.
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | range | mixed | 2024 | calls | call centers | North America |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | mixed | 2024 | calls | call centers | North America |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | mixed | 2023 | conversations (chat) | cross-industry | Germany |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | mixed | 2023 | conversations (chat) | cross-industry | USA |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | mixed | 2023 | tickets | cross-industry | USA |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | mixed | 2023 | tickets | cross-industry | global |
Browse the Top Benchmarked KPIs in Omni-channel Support
The benchmarks KPI Depot tracks here span two sources and several channels, and the channel split is the first caution. SQM Group reports on calls in North American contact centers, while Freshworks reports on chat conversations and on tickets across industries and geographies. A resolution rate for phone calls, one for live chat, and one for tickets are not comparable, because what a single resolvable unit is differs by channel and so does the customer's expectation.
Underneath the channels sit two definitional forks. The sources differ on what counts as resolved, whether it means solved on first contact or eventually closed after several touches, and reopened tickets may or may not be netted back out. They also differ in population and geography, from North American call centers to cross-industry samples in Germany, the United States, and beyond, and resolution norms shift with both. Before setting any external resolution figure beside your own, confirm the channel, the definition of a resolution, and whether reopens are counted, because those choices move the number more than performance does.
In the Omni-channel Support KPI group, Average Resolution Rate ladders to the objective of maximizing operational efficiency to handle increasing support demand without adding headcount. It works there as a key result showing that a rising share of issues is being cleared as volume grows.
Because resolution rate can be lifted by closing rather than solving, the honest framing pairs it with a quality key result from the same group. A team might set an illustrative goal to raise the resolution rate while holding First Contact Resolution and Customer Satisfaction Score steady, so efficiency does not come at the expense of the experience objective the group ranks first. The structural point is that a resolution-volume metric laddered to an efficiency objective needs a quality guardrail beside it, or it rewards reopened tickets and rushed closes.
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.
The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.
When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.
Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.
Got a question? Email us at [email protected].
A good Average Resolution Rate typically exceeds 80%. Companies achieving this benchmark often enjoy higher customer satisfaction and retention rates.
Improvement can be achieved through better training, streamlined processes, and effective use of analytics. Focusing on these areas enables quicker and more accurate resolutions.
No, while important, it should be considered alongside other metrics like customer satisfaction and first contact resolution. A holistic view provides deeper insights into customer service performance.
Regular reviews, ideally monthly, help track performance trends and identify areas for improvement. Frequent analysis allows for timely adjustments to strategies.
Customer relationship management (CRM) systems and ticketing software are effective tools for tracking resolution rates. These platforms provide valuable data for analysis and reporting.
Yes, higher resolution rates can lead to increased customer satisfaction, which positively influences retention and revenue. Improved customer experiences often translate into better financial outcomes.
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected
NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)