Build Time per Part

Related KPIs

Build Time per Part Interpretation

High values for Build Time per Part indicate inefficiencies in production processes, potentially leading to increased costs and delayed delivery schedules. Conversely, low values suggest streamlined operations and effective resource management. Ideal targets typically fall within a specific range tailored to industry standards and operational capabilities.

• <5 hours – Optimal for high-volume production environments
• 5–10 hours – Acceptable for moderate complexity parts
• >10 hours – Requires immediate investigation and process improvement

Common Pitfalls

Many organizations overlook the importance of continuous monitoring of Build Time per Part, leading to stagnation in operational improvements.

• Failing to invest in automation can slow down production significantly. Manual processes often introduce errors and increase cycle times, negatively impacting overall efficiency.
• Neglecting employee training on new technologies results in underutilization of available tools. Without proper knowledge, staff may struggle to optimize processes, leading to longer build times.
• Ignoring feedback from frontline workers can prevent the identification of bottlenecks. Employees often have valuable insights into inefficiencies that management may overlook.
• Overcomplicating production workflows can create unnecessary delays. Streamlining processes and reducing handoffs can significantly enhance build times and operational flow.

Improvement Levers

Enhancing Build Time per Part requires a focus on process optimization and technology integration.

• Implement lean manufacturing principles to eliminate waste and streamline workflows. Techniques like value stream mapping can help identify and remove non-value-added activities.
• Invest in advanced manufacturing technologies, such as robotics and AI, to automate repetitive tasks. Automation can significantly reduce cycle times and improve consistency in production.
• Regularly review and refine production schedules to align with demand fluctuations. Agile scheduling allows for better resource allocation and can minimize downtime.
• Encourage cross-functional collaboration to identify and address inefficiencies. Bringing together different departments can foster innovative solutions and improve overall performance.

Build Time per Part Case Study Example

A leading aerospace manufacturer faced escalating production costs due to excessive Build Time per Part, which averaged 12 hours. This inefficiency not only strained profit margins but also delayed product launches, impacting customer satisfaction. To address this, the company initiated a comprehensive review of its production processes, focusing on identifying bottlenecks and areas for improvement.

The team implemented lean methodologies, resulting in the elimination of redundant steps in the assembly line. They also invested in training programs for employees, ensuring they were equipped to utilize new technologies effectively. As a result, Build Time per Part decreased to an average of 8 hours within six months, leading to significant cost savings and improved delivery timelines.

The financial impact was substantial, with the company reporting a 15% increase in profitability due to reduced operational costs. Enhanced build efficiency also allowed for quicker response times to market demands, positioning the company favorably against competitors. This initiative not only improved internal processes but also strengthened relationships with key clients, who appreciated the faster turnaround times.