Co-Innovation Initiatives KPI

What is Co-Innovation Initiatives?
The number of co-innovation initiatives with strategic partners.

View Benchmarks




Co-Innovation Initiatives serve as a critical KPI for organizations aiming to enhance their strategic alignment and operational efficiency.

By fostering collaborative innovation, companies can drive significant business outcomes, including improved product development cycles and enhanced customer satisfaction.

This KPI not only tracks the effectiveness of partnerships but also provides analytical insights into resource allocation and ROI metrics.

Organizations that excel in co-innovation often see faster time-to-market and reduced costs, ultimately boosting their financial health.

A robust co-innovation strategy can lead to sustainable growth and a stronger market position.

Co-Innovation Initiatives Interpretation

High values in co-innovation initiatives indicate a thriving collaborative environment, suggesting that organizations are effectively leveraging partnerships to drive innovation. Conversely, low values may signal stagnation or ineffective collaboration, potentially hindering growth and competitiveness. Ideal targets should reflect industry standards and organizational goals, aiming for continuous improvement in co-innovation efforts.

  • High engagement (above target threshold) – Indicates strong collaborative efforts and successful innovation outcomes.
  • Moderate engagement (at target threshold) – Suggests room for improvement in partnership effectiveness.
  • Low engagement (below target threshold) – Signals a need for strategic reassessment of co-innovation practices.

Co-Innovation Initiatives Benchmarks

We have 21 relevant benchmarks in our benchmarks database.

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent threshold 2010–2012 and 2012–2014 innovation projects Flemish economy 999 observations on 879 different firms

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent threshold 2010–2012 and 2012–2014 innovation projects Flemish economy 999 observations on 879 different firms

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only distribution 2010–2012 and 2012–2014 firms Flemish economy 999 observations on 879 different firms

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent percent 2010–2012 and 2012–2014 innovation active firms Flemish economy 999 observations on 879 different firms

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent percent 2010–2012 and 2012–2014 firms Flemish economy 999 observations on 879 different firms

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent percent 2010–2012 and 2012–2014 firms Flemish economy 999 observations on 879 different firms

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only partner types average 2010–2012 and 2012–2014 innovators Flemish economy 999 observations on 879 different firms

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only share average 2010–2012 and 2012–2014 innovation projects Flemish economy 999 observations on 879 different firms

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only share average 2010–2012 and 2012–2014 innovation projects Flemish economy 999 observations on 879 different firms

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only projects quartile bands 2010–2012 and 2012–2014 firms Flemish economy 999 observations on 879 different firms

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only projects median and average 2010–2012 and 2012–2014 firms Flemish economy 999 observations on 879 different firms

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent median values revenues annually in excess of US$ 250 million and more than 2011 projects Europe and US n = 91

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent median values revenues annually in excess of US$ 250 million and more than 2011 projects Europe and US n = 91

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent average revenues annually in excess of US$ 250 million and more than 2011 projects Europe and US n = 91

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent percent company partners Finland

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent percent Co-Innovation project participants Finland N= 96 for research organisations / 111 for companies

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent share SMEs 2018-2022 Co-Innovation company project partners Finland

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only M€ average with min-max 2018-2022 Co-Innovation projects Finland 136 projects

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only M€ average 2018-2022 Co-Innovation projects Finland 136 projects

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only partners average 2018-2022 Co-Innovation projects Finland 136 projects

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only projects total 2018-2022 Co-Innovation projects Finland

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Common Pitfalls

Many organizations overlook the importance of a structured KPI framework for co-innovation initiatives, leading to ineffective measurement and management.

  • Failing to establish clear objectives can result in misaligned efforts. Without defined goals, teams may pursue initiatives that do not contribute to strategic outcomes, wasting resources and time.
  • Neglecting to involve key stakeholders often leads to a lack of buy-in. When critical team members are excluded, it can create silos and diminish the collaborative spirit necessary for successful co-innovation.
  • Overcomplicating the co-innovation process can stifle creativity. Rigid structures and excessive bureaucracy may deter teams from exploring innovative solutions, ultimately limiting potential breakthroughs.
  • Ignoring feedback from partners can undermine future collaborations. Constructive criticism is vital for refining processes and ensuring that all parties feel valued and engaged.

KPI Depot is trusted by consulting, strategy, finance, and analytics teams at leading organizations worldwide, including those listed below.

AAMC Accenture AXA Bristol Myers Squibb Capgemini DBS Bank Dell Delta Emirates Global Aluminum EY GSK GlaskoSmithKline Honeywell IBM Mitre Northrup Grumman Novo Nordisk NTT Data PepsiCo Samsung Suntory TCS Tata Consultancy Services Vodafone

Improvement Levers

Enhancing co-innovation initiatives requires a focus on collaboration, communication, and continuous improvement.

  • Establish clear communication channels to facilitate collaboration. Regular check-ins and updates can help teams stay aligned and address challenges promptly.
  • Implement a structured feedback loop to gather insights from all stakeholders. This can help identify pain points and areas for improvement, fostering a culture of continuous enhancement.
  • Encourage cross-functional teams to work together on innovation projects. Diverse perspectives can lead to more creative solutions and better alignment with business outcomes.
  • Invest in training programs to equip teams with the skills needed for effective collaboration. Workshops on innovation methodologies can enhance understanding and execution of co-innovation strategies.

Co-Innovation Initiatives Case Study Example

A leading technology firm faced challenges in bringing new products to market due to fragmented co-innovation efforts with external partners. Recognizing the need for a cohesive strategy, the company initiated a comprehensive review of its co-innovation initiatives. By establishing a centralized platform for collaboration, they streamlined communication and aligned objectives across departments and partners. This shift led to a significant reduction in product development time, enabling the firm to launch two major products ahead of schedule.

The company also implemented regular innovation workshops, inviting input from both internal teams and external partners. These sessions fostered a culture of creativity and shared ownership, resulting in a 30% increase in successful project outcomes. The enhanced collaboration not only improved product quality but also strengthened relationships with key partners, creating a more resilient innovation ecosystem.

As a result of these efforts, the firm reported a 25% increase in revenue from new products within the first year. The strategic alignment achieved through improved co-innovation initiatives positioned the company as a market leader, capable of responding swiftly to changing customer needs. This case illustrates the transformative power of effective co-innovation strategies in driving business success.

Related KPIs


What is the standard formula?
Total Number of Joint Innovation Projects Initiated with Partners


Unlock all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks.
Comparable benchmark data services start at $2,400 per year.
See all 21 benchmarks for Co-Innovation Initiatives
Access to 35,625 benchmarks
Access to 24,181 KPIs
Interactive Strategy Maps on every plan
13 attributes per KPI (view)

Compare Plans

KPI Categories

This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:



KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.

The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.

When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.

Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.

Got a question? Email us at [email protected].

FAQs about Co-Innovation Initiatives

What is a co-innovation initiative?

A co-innovation initiative is a collaborative effort between organizations to develop new products, services, or processes. It leverages the strengths of multiple partners to drive innovation and achieve shared goals.

Why are co-innovation initiatives important?

These initiatives foster creativity and accelerate time-to-market for new offerings. They also enhance strategic alignment and can lead to improved financial health through shared resources and expertise.

How can we measure the success of co-innovation initiatives?

Success can be measured through various KPIs, including the number of successful projects launched, revenue generated from new products, and stakeholder satisfaction. Regular assessments can help track progress and identify areas for improvement.

What challenges do organizations face in co-innovation?

Common challenges include misaligned objectives, communication barriers, and lack of stakeholder engagement. Addressing these issues is crucial for fostering effective collaboration and achieving desired outcomes.

How can we enhance collaboration in co-innovation initiatives?

Implementing structured communication channels and regular feedback loops can significantly enhance collaboration. Encouraging cross-functional teams to participate in innovation projects also fosters diverse perspectives and creative solutions.

What role does leadership play in co-innovation?

Leadership is essential in setting the vision and strategic direction for co-innovation initiatives. Leaders must champion collaboration and ensure that resources are allocated effectively to support these efforts.



Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.

KPI Definition

A clear explanation of what the KPI measures

Potential Business Insights

The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI

Measurement Approach

An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI

Standard Formula

The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI

Trend Analysis

Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts

Diagnostic Questions

Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve

Actionable Tips

Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions

Visualization Suggestions

Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making

Risk Warnings

Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention

Tools & Technologies

Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively

Integration Points

How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management

Change Impact

Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected

BSC Perspective

NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)


Compare Our Plans


Explore KPI Depot by Function & Industry