Co-invention Collaborations KPI

What is Co-invention Collaborations?
The number of collaborative projects with external entities that result in co-owned or shared IP rights.

View Benchmarks




Co-invention Collaborations serve as a vital KPI for organizations aiming to enhance innovation and operational efficiency.

By tracking these partnerships, companies can improve their financial health and drive significant business outcomes, such as faster product development and increased market share.

Effective co-invention initiatives foster strategic alignment between stakeholders, enabling data-driven decision-making.

This KPI also acts as a performance indicator for assessing the ROI of collaborative efforts, ensuring resources are allocated efficiently.

Organizations that excel in co-invention often see a marked improvement in forecasting accuracy and overall business intelligence.

Ultimately, this KPI is essential for measuring the impact of collaborative innovation on long-term growth.

Co-invention Collaborations Interpretation

High values in co-invention collaborations indicate robust engagement and successful partnerships, while low values may suggest missed opportunities or ineffective collaboration strategies. Ideal targets should reflect industry benchmarks and organizational goals, ensuring that partnerships yield tangible results.

  • High (>10 collaborations) – Strong innovation pipeline and market responsiveness
  • Moderate (5-10 collaborations) – Room for improvement; assess partnership effectiveness
  • Low (<5 collaborations) – Potential stagnation; consider strategic partnerships

Co-invention Collaborations Benchmarks

We have 7 relevant benchmarks in our benchmarks database.

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent share Top 2,500 R&D investors 2005-2015 patent applications owned by a Scoreboard firm at the USPTO EU-28, US

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent share Top 2,500 R&D investors last two years illustrated patent applications owned by a Scoreboard firm at the EPO EU-28, US, China

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent share patent applications global

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent share 2003-2013 patent applications with at least one DR or WBC inventor Danube Region countries and Western Balkan countries

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent share second half of the 2010s patents

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent share early 2000s patents

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent share until 2009 patents

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Common Pitfalls

Many organizations overlook the nuances of co-invention collaborations, leading to missed opportunities for innovation and growth.

  • Failing to establish clear objectives can result in misaligned expectations among partners. Without defined goals, teams may struggle to measure success or identify areas for improvement.
  • Neglecting to foster open communication often leads to misunderstandings and conflicts. Regular check-ins and updates are crucial for maintaining alignment and addressing issues promptly.
  • Overcomplicating partnership agreements can create barriers to collaboration. Simplified contracts that prioritize flexibility and mutual benefit encourage more productive interactions.
  • Ignoring cultural differences between organizations can hinder collaboration efforts. Understanding and respecting diverse perspectives fosters a more inclusive environment that drives innovation.

KPI Depot is trusted by consulting, strategy, finance, and analytics teams at leading organizations worldwide, including those listed below.

AAMC Accenture AXA Bristol Myers Squibb Capgemini DBS Bank Dell Delta Emirates Global Aluminum EY GSK GlaskoSmithKline Honeywell IBM Mitre Northrup Grumman Novo Nordisk NTT Data PepsiCo Samsung Suntory TCS Tata Consultancy Services Vodafone

Improvement Levers

Enhancing co-invention collaborations requires a focus on building trust, streamlining processes, and leveraging technology.

  • Establish regular communication channels to ensure transparency and alignment. Frequent updates and feedback loops help maintain momentum and address challenges as they arise.
  • Utilize collaborative platforms that facilitate real-time sharing of ideas and resources. These tools can enhance engagement and streamline workflows, making it easier to track progress and outcomes.
  • Invest in training programs that promote collaboration skills among team members. Equipping employees with the right tools and techniques fosters a culture of innovation and teamwork.
  • Encourage cross-functional teams to participate in co-invention initiatives. Diverse perspectives can lead to more creative solutions and drive better business outcomes.

Co-invention Collaborations Case Study Example

A leading technology firm, Tech Innovations Inc., recognized the need to enhance its co-invention collaborations to stay competitive in a rapidly evolving market. The company had been struggling with stagnant product development timelines, which were impacting its market share. By analyzing its collaboration metrics, Tech Innovations discovered that its partnerships were limited and often lacked strategic alignment.

To address this, the company launched a new initiative called "Collaborate to Innovate," aimed at expanding its network of co-invention partners. This initiative focused on identifying key industry players and fostering relationships through joint workshops and brainstorming sessions. By creating a structured framework for collaboration, Tech Innovations was able to streamline its processes and enhance communication between teams.

Within a year, the number of co-invention collaborations increased by 150%, leading to the successful launch of three new products that generated significant revenue. The company also reported a 30% reduction in time-to-market for new offerings, thanks to improved alignment and shared resources among partners. This success not only bolstered Tech Innovations' market position but also reinforced its reputation as a leader in collaborative innovation.

The "Collaborate to Innovate" initiative ultimately transformed the company's approach to partnerships, positioning it as a go-to collaborator in the tech industry. By leveraging the insights gained from co-invention collaborations, Tech Innovations was able to make data-driven decisions that enhanced its overall business strategy and operational efficiency.

Related KPIs


What is the standard formula?
Number of Co-invention Collaborations


Unlock all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks.
Comparable benchmark data services start at $2,400 per year.
See all 7 benchmarks for Co-invention Collaborations
Access to 35,625 benchmarks
Access to 24,181 KPIs
Interactive Strategy Maps on every plan
13 attributes per KPI (view)

Compare Plans

KPI Categories

This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:



KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.

The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.

When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.

Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.

Got a question? Email us at [email protected].

FAQs about Co-invention Collaborations

What is co-invention collaboration?

Co-invention collaboration refers to partnerships between organizations aimed at jointly developing new products or solutions. These collaborations leverage the strengths and expertise of each partner to drive innovation and improve market competitiveness.

How can I measure the success of co-invention collaborations?

Success can be measured through various KPIs, including the number of collaborations, time-to-market for new products, and revenue generated from collaborative efforts. Regular assessments and feedback from partners also provide valuable insights into effectiveness.

What industries benefit most from co-invention collaborations?

Industries such as technology, pharmaceuticals, and manufacturing often see significant benefits from co-invention collaborations. These sectors thrive on innovation and require diverse expertise to address complex challenges and market demands.

How do cultural differences impact co-invention collaborations?

Cultural differences can influence communication styles, decision-making processes, and expectations. Understanding and respecting these differences is crucial for fostering effective collaboration and achieving desired outcomes.

What role does technology play in co-invention collaborations?

Technology facilitates communication, resource sharing, and project management among partners. Collaborative platforms and tools enhance engagement and streamline workflows, making it easier to track progress and results.

How often should co-invention collaborations be evaluated?

Regular evaluations, ideally quarterly or bi-annually, help organizations assess the effectiveness of their collaborations. These assessments should focus on outcomes, challenges, and opportunities for improvement to ensure ongoing success.



Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.

KPI Definition

A clear explanation of what the KPI measures

Potential Business Insights

The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI

Measurement Approach

An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI

Standard Formula

The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI

Trend Analysis

Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts

Diagnostic Questions

Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve

Actionable Tips

Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions

Visualization Suggestions

Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making

Risk Warnings

Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention

Tools & Technologies

Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively

Integration Points

How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management

Change Impact

Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected

BSC Perspective

NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)


Compare Our Plans


Explore KPI Depot by Function & Industry