Corrective Action Closure Rate


Corrective Action Closure Rate

What is Corrective Action Closure Rate?
The rate at which identified compliance issues are resolved and closed within a stipulated timeframe.

View Benchmarks




Corrective Action Closure Rate is a critical KPI that measures the effectiveness of an organization's response to identified issues.

High closure rates indicate strong operational efficiency and a commitment to continuous improvement, directly influencing financial health and customer satisfaction.

Conversely, low rates may signal systemic problems, leading to increased costs and potential reputational damage.

Companies that excel in this metric often see enhanced ROI and better alignment with strategic goals.

By leveraging this KPI, organizations can make data-driven decisions that foster a culture of accountability and proactive management.

Corrective Action Closure Rate Interpretation

High closure rates reflect a robust corrective action process, showcasing a company's ability to address issues swiftly. Low rates may indicate inefficiencies or a lack of accountability, potentially leading to recurring problems. Ideal targets typically exceed 90%, ensuring that most identified actions are resolved promptly.

  • 90% and above – Exemplary performance; proactive culture evident
  • 70%–89% – Acceptable; room for improvement in processes
  • Below 70% – Urgent need for root-cause analysis and process overhaul

Corrective Action Closure Rate Benchmarks

We have 3 relevant benchmark(s) in our benchmarks database.

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent over a four year period past GAO recommendations United States

Benchmark data is only available to KPI Depot subscribers. The full benchmark database contains 14,254 benchmarks.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent 2016–17 to 2023–24 performance audit recommendations public sector Queensland, Australia 79 entities; 362 recommendations

Benchmark data is only available to KPI Depot subscribers. The full benchmark database contains 14,254 benchmarks.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent 2016–17 to 2023–24 (as reported in 2025) recommendations to councils public sector—local government Queensland, Australia 27 local governments; 72 recommendations

Benchmark data is only available to KPI Depot subscribers. The full benchmark database contains 14,254 benchmarks.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Common Pitfalls

Many organizations underestimate the importance of timely corrective action closure, leading to unresolved issues that can escalate.

  • Failing to prioritize corrective actions can result in a backlog of unresolved issues. This often leads to operational inefficiencies and increased costs, as problems persist and multiply over time.
  • Neglecting to assign clear ownership for corrective actions creates ambiguity. Without accountability, team members may not feel compelled to act, delaying resolution and impacting overall performance.
  • Inadequate tracking mechanisms can obscure the true status of corrective actions. Without proper visibility, management may lack the analytical insight needed to make informed decisions.
  • Overcomplicating the corrective action process can hinder closure rates. Streamlined procedures are essential for ensuring that actions are completed efficiently and effectively.

Improvement Levers

Enhancing the Corrective Action Closure Rate requires a focus on accountability, transparency, and streamlined processes.

  • Implement a centralized reporting dashboard to track corrective actions. This allows for real-time visibility and fosters a culture of accountability among team members.
  • Establish clear ownership for each corrective action to ensure accountability. Assigning specific individuals or teams to follow through on actions can significantly improve closure rates.
  • Regularly review and analyze closure rates to identify trends and areas for improvement. This quantitative analysis can inform strategic adjustments to processes and resource allocation.
  • Provide training and resources to empower teams in executing corrective actions. Equipping staff with the necessary tools and knowledge can enhance operational efficiency and closure rates.

Corrective Action Closure Rate Case Study Example

A leading manufacturing firm faced challenges with its Corrective Action Closure Rate, which lingered around 65%. This low rate resulted in recurring quality issues, impacting customer satisfaction and profitability. Recognizing the urgency, the executive team initiated a comprehensive review of their corrective action processes. They implemented a new tracking system that provided real-time insights into the status of each action item. Additionally, they established a cross-functional team responsible for oversight and accountability. Within a year, the closure rate improved to 92%, leading to a significant reduction in quality-related complaints and a boost in customer loyalty. The company also realized a 15% increase in operational efficiency, allowing them to redirect resources toward innovation and growth initiatives.

Related KPIs


What is the standard formula?
(Number of Corrective Actions Closed / Total Number of Corrective Actions Issued) * 100


You can't improve what you don't measure.

Unlock smarter decisions with instant access to 20,000+ KPIs and 10,000+ benchmarks.

Subscribe to KPI Depot Today

KPI Categories

This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:



KPI Depot (formerly the Flevy KPI Library) is a comprehensive, fully searchable database of over 20,000+ KPIs and 10,000+ benchmarks. Each KPI is documented with 12 practical attributes that take you from definition to real-world application (definition, business insights, measurement approach, formula, trend analysis, diagnostics, tips, visualization ideas, risk warnings, tools & tech, integration points, and change impact).

KPI categories span every major corporate function and more than 150+ industries, giving executives, analysts, and consultants an instant, plug-and-play reference for building scorecards, dashboards, and data-driven strategies.

Our team is constantly expanding our KPI database and benchmarks database.

Got a question? Email us at support@kpidepot.com.

FAQs

What is a good Corrective Action Closure Rate?

A good closure rate typically exceeds 90%. This indicates a proactive approach to addressing issues and maintaining operational efficiency.

How can we track corrective actions effectively?

Utilizing a centralized reporting dashboard is essential for tracking corrective actions. This ensures that all stakeholders have visibility into the status and progress of each action item.

What are the consequences of a low closure rate?

A low closure rate can lead to unresolved issues, increased operational costs, and diminished customer satisfaction. It may also impact the overall financial health of the organization.

How often should closure rates be reviewed?

Reviewing closure rates quarterly is advisable for most organizations. This frequency allows for timely adjustments and ensures that corrective actions remain a priority.

Can technology improve closure rates?

Yes, technology can streamline the tracking and management of corrective actions. Automated systems can reduce manual errors and enhance accountability.

What role does leadership play in improving closure rates?

Leadership is crucial in fostering a culture of accountability and urgency. By prioritizing corrective actions and providing necessary resources, leaders can drive improvements in closure rates.


Explore KPI Depot by Function & Industry



Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 12 attributes.

KPI Definition

A clear explanation of what the KPI measures

Potential Business Insights

The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI

Measurement Approach

An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI

Standard Formula

The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI

Trend Analysis

Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts

Diagnostic Questions

Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve

Actionable Tips

Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions

Visualization Suggestions

Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making

Risk Warnings

Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention

Tools & Technologies

Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively

Integration Points

How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management

Change Impact

Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected


Compare Our Plans