Cost of Funds (COF) KPI

Cost of Funds (COF) serves as a critical performance indicator for assessing the financial health of an organization.

It directly influences business outcomes such as profitability, liquidity, and overall operational efficiency.

By measuring the cost associated with obtaining capital, organizations can make data-driven decisions that enhance their strategic alignment.

A lower COF often translates to improved ROI metrics, allowing companies to invest more in growth initiatives.

Conversely, a high COF can signal inefficiencies in capital management, leading to increased financial strain.

Tracking this KPI enables executives to forecast accurately and benchmark against industry standards.

How Cost of Funds (COF) Connects to Your Strategy

Cost of Funds sits in one KPI group, FinTech, and it ranks very low in it, well behind the metrics that define the group: Customer Acquisition Cost (CAC), Lifetime Value (LTV), Monthly Recurring Revenue (MRR), and Annual Recurring Revenue (ARR). Its balanced scorecard perspective is financial, and that low rank is itself the insight. The FinTech KPI group is built around subscription-style growth and customer economics, while Cost of Funds is a lending-and-deposit metric that only matters for the subset of fintechs that actually fund loans or hold balances.

For those firms, though, it is foundational rather than peripheral, because their unit economics live in the spread between what they earn on lending and what their funding costs. That is where the tension with the group's growth metrics appears. The drive to scale, visible in MRR and Active Users, often means raising more funding to lend against, and pulling in that funding quickly can raise Cost of Funds, compressing the very margin the growth was meant to produce. Read Cost of Funds against the growth metrics for any lending fintech, because acquiring customers and balances is only valuable if the funding behind them stays cheap enough to earn a spread. For a pure software fintech with no balance sheet, by contrast, its low rank in this KPI group is appropriate, since the metric barely applies.

Measuring Cost of Funds (COF) in Practice

The formula is total interest paid over total funds, and the judgment is in defining both the numerator's interest and the denominator's funding base. On the numerator, decide what counts as a funding cost: interest on deposits and borrowings clearly belongs, but whether to include the fees and hedging costs attached to raising funds is a real choice that changes the rate. A definition that captures only headline interest understates the true cost of money.

On the denominator, settle which funds are in the base. Interest-bearing liabilities only, or all funding including non-interest-bearing deposits and equity, give very different rates, and the all-in version is the more honest picture of what the institution actually pays to fund its assets. Use an average balance across the period rather than a point-in-time figure, because funding levels move and a single snapshot distorts the rate in a growing or seasonal book.

Segment by funding source, since deposits, wholesale borrowing, and capital markets funding carry different costs and different stability, and a blended Cost of Funds hides a dangerous reliance on cheap but flighty funding. Read it next to the yield on assets, because Cost of Funds means little in isolation: what matters is the spread between it and what the funds earn, and the metric should rise or fall in the context of that spread rather than on its own.

Common Pitfalls

Many organizations misinterpret COF, leading to misguided financial strategies.

• Relying solely on historical data can distort current COF analysis. Market conditions change rapidly, and outdated figures may not reflect true costs, leading to poor decision-making.
• Neglecting to factor in all financing sources skews the metric. Overlooking alternative funding options, like equity or grants, can result in an inflated COF that misrepresents financial health.
• Failing to regularly review financing agreements can lead to unfavorable terms. Companies may miss opportunities to renegotiate rates, locking themselves into higher costs unnecessarily.
• Ignoring external economic factors can mislead COF assessments. Changes in interest rates or market volatility can significantly impact borrowing costs, requiring adjustments in strategy.

Improvement Levers

Enhancing COF requires a proactive approach to financial management and strategic planning.

• Conduct regular reviews of financing options to identify better rates. Engaging with multiple lenders can foster competition and lead to more favorable terms.
• Implement a robust cash management system to optimize liquidity. Efficient cash flow forecasting can reduce reliance on expensive short-term financing.
• Negotiate with suppliers for extended payment terms to improve cash flow. This tactic can lower immediate capital needs and reduce overall COF.
• Explore alternative funding sources, such as equity financing or grants. Diversifying capital sources can mitigate reliance on high-cost debt.

KPI Depot is trusted by consulting, strategy, finance, and analytics teams at leading organizations worldwide, including those listed below.

OKRs That Use Cost of Funds (COF)

Cost of Funds is not named in the FinTech KPI group's published OKR examples, but it sits directly beneath one that is. The group's financial-performance objective tracks Net Interest Margin, and Cost of Funds is the funding side of that margin: NIM widens when the spread between asset yield and Cost of Funds grows, so a team committed to improving NIM is implicitly committed to managing Cost of Funds.

A lending fintech pursuing that profitability objective can carry Cost of Funds as a supporting key result, with the direction being cheaper, more stable funding rather than the lowest possible rate, since the cheapest funding is often the least reliable. Pairing it with Net Interest Margin keeps the focus on the spread rather than on funding cost alone, which is the only way the metric means anything. Any Cost of Funds target a team sets is an internal goal tied to its own funding mix and rate environment, not a benchmark.

See OKR Examples for FinTech

KPI Categories

This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database: