Cost to Serve (CTS) is a critical KPI that quantifies the total cost associated with delivering products or services to customers.
It influences financial health, operational efficiency, and customer satisfaction.
By understanding CTS, organizations can identify cost control metrics that lead to improved profitability and resource allocation.
A lower CTS often indicates effective resource management and streamlined operations, while a higher CTS can signal inefficiencies that require attention.
Businesses leveraging this metric can enhance their forecasting accuracy and make data-driven decisions that align with strategic goals.
High values of Cost to Serve suggest inefficiencies in operations, potentially leading to reduced profitability. Conversely, low values indicate effective cost management and operational efficiency. Ideal targets vary by industry but generally aim for a balance that maximizes ROI while maintaining service quality.
We have 14 relevant benchmark(s) in our benchmarks database.
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | percentage of sales | percentiles | gross annual revenues from $165 million to more than $32 bil | 2015–2016 | outbound logistics costs | consumer packaged goods | United States | more than 30 leading CPG companies |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | percentage of sales | percentiles | gross annual revenues from $165 million to more than $32 bil | 2015–2016 | replenishment freight costs | consumer packaged goods | United States | more than 30 leading CPG companies |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | percentage of sales | percentiles | gross annual revenues from $165 million to more than $32 bil | 2015–2016 | distribution center and intermediate warehouse operations co | consumer packaged goods | United States | more than 30 leading CPG companies |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | percentage of sales | percentiles | gross annual revenues from $165 million to more than $32 bil | 2015–2016 | customer freight costs | consumer packaged goods | United States | more than 30 leading CPG companies |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | percentage of sales | percentiles | gross annual revenues from $165 million to more than $32 bil | 2015–2016 | management and overhead related to logistics | consumer packaged goods | United States | more than 30 leading CPG companies |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | dollars per case | percentiles | gross annual revenues from $165 million to more than $32 bil | 2015–2016 | logistics cost per case (ambient goods) | consumer packaged goods | United States | more than 30 leading CPG companies |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | dollars per case | percentiles | gross annual revenues from $165 million to more than $32 bil | 2015–2016 | replenishment freight cost per case | consumer packaged goods | United States | more than 30 leading CPG companies |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | dollars per case | percentiles | gross annual revenues from $165 million to more than $32 bil | 2015–2016 | DC and intermediate warehouse cost per case | consumer packaged goods | United States | more than 30 leading CPG companies |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | dollars per case | percentiles | gross annual revenues from $165 million to more than $32 bil | 2015–2016 | customer freight cost per case | consumer packaged goods | United States | more than 30 leading CPG companies |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | dollars per case | percentiles | gross annual revenues from $165 million to more than $32 bil | 2015–2016 | management and overhead cost per case | consumer packaged goods | United States | more than 30 leading CPG companies |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | percent of revenues | range | distribution and transportation costs | consumer packaged goods |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | percent of sales | band | 2012 | distribution center operations | cross-industry warehousing and logistics |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | dollars per unit shipped | band | 2012 | distribution center operations | cross-industry warehousing and logistics |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | dollars per $100 order | typical | 2022 | online grocery order fulfillment | grocery |
Many organizations overlook the nuances of Cost to Serve, leading to misguided strategies that can harm profitability.
Enhancing Cost to Serve requires a focused approach on both operational processes and customer engagement strategies.
A leading consumer goods company faced rising costs associated with serving its diverse customer base. Over the past year, its Cost to Serve had increased by 15%, prompting concerns about profitability and competitiveness. The executive team recognized the need for a comprehensive analysis to identify inefficiencies and implement corrective measures. They initiated a project called "Cost Clarity," aimed at dissecting the various components contributing to CTS.
The project revealed that certain customer segments were disproportionately driving up costs due to high service levels and complex logistics. By re-evaluating service agreements and standardizing processes, the company was able to streamline operations. Additionally, they implemented a reporting dashboard that provided real-time insights into cost metrics, enabling data-driven decision-making across departments.
Within 6 months, the company reduced its Cost to Serve by 20%, translating to significant savings and improved margins. The enhanced visibility into cost drivers also fostered a culture of accountability and continuous improvement. As a result, the company not only improved its financial health but also strengthened its strategic alignment with market demands.
You can't improve what you don't measure.
Unlock smarter decisions with instant access to 20,000+ KPIs and 10,000+ benchmarks.
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot (formerly the Flevy KPI Library) is a comprehensive, fully searchable database of over 20,000+ KPIs and 10,000+ benchmarks. Each KPI is documented with 12 practical attributes that take you from definition to real-world application (definition, business insights, measurement approach, formula, trend analysis, diagnostics, tips, visualization ideas, risk warnings, tools & tech, integration points, and change impact).
KPI categories span every major corporate function and more than 150+ industries, giving executives, analysts, and consultants an instant, plug-and-play reference for building scorecards, dashboards, and data-driven strategies.
Our team is constantly expanding our KPI database and benchmarks database.
Got a question? Email us at support@kpidepot.com.
What factors influence Cost to Serve?
Several factors can impact Cost to Serve, including logistics, customer service levels, and product complexity. Understanding these elements helps organizations identify areas for improvement and cost reduction.
How can Cost to Serve be calculated?
Cost to Serve can be calculated by summing all costs associated with delivering a product or service, including manufacturing, logistics, and customer service expenses. This total is then divided by the number of units sold or customers served to derive a per-unit cost.
Is Cost to Serve the same as profitability?
No, Cost to Serve measures the expenses related to delivering products or services, while profitability assesses the revenue generated after all expenses. A low Cost to Serve can contribute to higher profitability, but they are distinct metrics.
How often should Cost to Serve be reviewed?
Regular reviews of Cost to Serve are essential, ideally on a quarterly basis. This frequency allows organizations to respond quickly to changes in operational efficiency and market conditions.
Can technology improve Cost to Serve?
Yes, technology can significantly enhance Cost to Serve by automating processes, improving data accuracy, and providing analytical insights. Implementing business intelligence tools can lead to better decision-making and cost control.
What role does customer segmentation play in Cost to Serve?
Customer segmentation is crucial for understanding which segments drive higher costs and which are more profitable. Tailoring service levels based on profitability can optimize resources and improve overall efficiency.
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 12 attributes.
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected