Critical Vulnerabilities Closed Ratio KPI

What is Critical Vulnerabilities Closed Ratio?
The percentage of identified critical vulnerabilities that have been remediated within the organization's target timeframe.

View Benchmarks




Critical Vulnerabilities Closed Ratio is a vital metric that reflects an organization's ability to address security weaknesses effectively.

High ratios indicate robust security practices, fostering trust among stakeholders and enhancing overall financial health.

This KPI influences business outcomes such as risk mitigation, operational efficiency, and compliance adherence.

By tracking this ratio, executives can make data-driven decisions that align with strategic goals.

It serves as a leading indicator of an organization's cybersecurity posture, allowing for proactive measures rather than reactive fixes.

Ultimately, improving this ratio can lead to significant cost savings and a stronger market position.

Critical Vulnerabilities Closed Ratio Interpretation

A high Critical Vulnerabilities Closed Ratio signifies effective risk management and a proactive approach to security. Conversely, a low ratio may indicate resource constraints or ineffective remediation processes. Ideal targets typically exceed 90%, reflecting a commitment to maintaining a secure environment.

  • 90% and above – Strong security posture; proactive risk management
  • 70%–89% – Acceptable; consider resource allocation for improvements
  • Below 70% – Urgent attention needed; assess remediation strategies

Critical Vulnerabilities Closed Ratio Benchmarks

We have 5 relevant benchmarks in our benchmarks database.

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent per month average enterprise 2024 vulnerabilities cross-industry global

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent per month band 2025 report application security flaws application security global

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only days threshold 2022 critical or high-risk vulnerabilities from testing health and social care England

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only days threshold FY 2020 critical and high vulnerabilities identified through cyber h federal government United States

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent target by September 30, 2021 critical and high configuration-based vulnerabilities identi federal government United States

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Common Pitfalls

Many organizations underestimate the importance of timely vulnerability remediation, which can lead to significant security risks.

  • Failing to prioritize vulnerabilities based on severity can result in critical issues being overlooked. Not all vulnerabilities pose the same level of risk, and a lack of prioritization can lead to severe consequences.
  • Neglecting to allocate sufficient resources for remediation efforts often leads to backlogs. Without dedicated teams or tools, vulnerabilities may linger, increasing exposure to threats.
  • Overreliance on automated tools without human oversight can create blind spots. While automation is essential, human judgment is necessary to assess context and prioritize effectively.
  • Ignoring the need for continuous training and awareness among staff can weaken security protocols. Employees must understand the importance of vulnerability management to support overall efforts.

KPI Depot is trusted by consulting, strategy, finance, and analytics teams at leading organizations worldwide, including those listed below.

AAMC Accenture AXA Bristol Myers Squibb Capgemini DBS Bank Dell Delta Emirates Global Aluminum EY GSK GlaskoSmithKline Honeywell IBM Mitre Northrup Grumman Novo Nordisk NTT Data PepsiCo Samsung Suntory TCS Tata Consultancy Services Vodafone

Improvement Levers

Enhancing the Critical Vulnerabilities Closed Ratio requires a strategic focus on effective remediation practices and resource allocation.

  • Implement a robust vulnerability management program that includes regular assessments. Frequent evaluations help identify weaknesses before they can be exploited, improving overall security posture.
  • Prioritize vulnerabilities based on potential impact and exploitability. This ensures that the most critical issues are addressed first, reducing overall risk exposure.
  • Invest in training programs for IT and security teams to enhance skills. Well-trained staff are better equipped to handle vulnerabilities effectively and efficiently.
  • Utilize advanced analytics to track remediation progress and identify trends. Data-driven insights can inform decision-making and help allocate resources more effectively.

Critical Vulnerabilities Closed Ratio Case Study Example

A mid-sized financial institution faced escalating cyber threats, with its Critical Vulnerabilities Closed Ratio hovering around 65%. This low ratio raised alarms among executives, as it indicated potential exposure to significant risks. In response, the organization launched a comprehensive initiative called “Secure First,” aimed at enhancing its vulnerability management processes. The initiative involved a thorough assessment of existing vulnerabilities, prioritization based on risk, and the allocation of additional resources to address critical issues.

Within 6 months, the institution implemented a new vulnerability management tool that automated scanning and reporting, significantly reducing manual workloads. The IT team also established a cross-functional task force to ensure that remediation efforts were prioritized effectively. As a result, the Critical Vulnerabilities Closed Ratio improved to 88%, reflecting a more proactive stance on security.

The financial institution's efforts not only strengthened its security posture but also improved stakeholder confidence. With a more secure environment, the organization was able to pursue new business opportunities without the constant fear of data breaches. The success of “Secure First” led to a cultural shift within the organization, emphasizing the importance of security across all departments.

Related KPIs


What is the standard formula?
(Number of Closed Critical Vulnerabilities / Total Number of Identified Critical Vulnerabilities) * 100


Unlock all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks.
Comparable benchmark data services start at $2,400 per year.
See all 5 benchmarks for Critical Vulnerabilities Closed Ratio
Access to 35,625 benchmarks
Access to 24,181 KPIs
Interactive Strategy Maps on every plan
13 attributes per KPI (view)

Compare Plans

KPI Categories

This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:



KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.

The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.

When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.

Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.

Got a question? Email us at [email protected].

FAQs about Critical Vulnerabilities Closed Ratio

What does a low Critical Vulnerabilities Closed Ratio indicate?

A low ratio suggests that an organization is not effectively addressing its security weaknesses. This can lead to increased risk exposure and potential breaches, impacting overall business health.

How often should this KPI be monitored?

Monitoring should occur at least monthly to ensure timely remediation of vulnerabilities. Frequent assessments help organizations stay ahead of emerging threats and maintain a strong security posture.

Can automation improve the Critical Vulnerabilities Closed Ratio?

Yes, automation can streamline vulnerability scanning and reporting processes. However, human oversight is still essential to prioritize and address vulnerabilities effectively.

What role does employee training play in improving this KPI?

Employee training is crucial for fostering a security-conscious culture. Well-informed staff can identify potential vulnerabilities and support remediation efforts, enhancing overall security.

Is there a target threshold for this KPI?

A target threshold of 90% or higher is generally recommended. Achieving this level indicates a strong commitment to vulnerability management and risk mitigation.

How can organizations benchmark their performance?

Organizations can benchmark their performance against industry averages or best practices. Comparing ratios with peers can provide valuable insights into areas for improvement.



Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.

KPI Definition

A clear explanation of what the KPI measures

Potential Business Insights

The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI

Measurement Approach

An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI

Standard Formula

The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI

Trend Analysis

Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts

Diagnostic Questions

Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve

Actionable Tips

Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions

Visualization Suggestions

Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making

Risk Warnings

Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention

Tools & Technologies

Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively

Integration Points

How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management

Change Impact

Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected

BSC Perspective

NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)


Compare Our Plans


Explore KPI Depot by Function & Industry