Cross-Jurisdictional Regulatory Approvals serve as a critical performance indicator for organizations navigating complex compliance landscapes.
This KPI influences business outcomes such as operational efficiency, risk management, and strategic alignment.
By tracking the time taken to secure necessary approvals across jurisdictions, companies can identify bottlenecks and streamline processes.
Enhanced forecasting accuracy in regulatory timelines can lead to improved project planning and resource allocation.
Ultimately, effective management of this KPI supports better financial health and maximizes ROI metrics.
Organizations that excel in this area often report significant cost savings and faster time-to-market for new initiatives.
High values indicate prolonged approval processes, which can delay project timelines and increase costs. Low values suggest efficient navigation of regulatory frameworks, enabling quicker project execution. Ideal targets typically align with industry benchmarks, often aiming for a target threshold of under 30 days for most approvals.
We have 4 relevant benchmarks in our benchmarks database.
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | days | median | 2023 | new active substances (NASs) | pharmaceuticals | global (six major agencies) |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | days | median; IQR | 2010–2019 | new oncology therapies approved by both regulators | pharmaceuticals—oncology | United States; European Union | 89 therapies |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | days | threshold | national regulatory authority decisions | pharmaceuticals and vaccines | participating countries |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | days | threshold | marketing authorisation applications | pharmaceuticals | European Union |
Many organizations underestimate the complexity of cross-jurisdictional approvals, leading to misaligned expectations and project delays.
Improving the efficiency of cross-jurisdictional approvals requires a proactive approach to compliance and communication.
A global pharmaceutical company faced significant delays in obtaining cross-jurisdictional regulatory approvals for its new drug. Over a period of 18 months, approval times exceeded 90 days, jeopardizing their market entry strategy and increasing costs. The company initiated a comprehensive review of its approval processes, identifying key areas for improvement. By establishing a dedicated compliance task force and leveraging business intelligence tools, they streamlined their submission process and enhanced communication with regulatory authorities. Within a year, the average approval time was reduced to 25 days, allowing the company to launch the drug ahead of competitors. This success not only improved their market position but also resulted in a substantial increase in projected revenue.
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.
The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.
When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.
Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.
Got a question? Email us at [email protected].
Approval times can be affected by the complexity of the submission, the responsiveness of regulatory bodies, and the completeness of documentation. Additionally, external factors like political changes or public health emergencies may also play a role.
Technology can automate documentation processes, provide real-time tracking of submissions, and facilitate communication with regulatory agencies. These efficiencies help organizations reduce approval times and improve compliance accuracy.
Delayed approvals can lead to increased costs, missed market opportunities, and potential reputational damage. Companies may also face penalties or legal challenges if they fail to comply with regulatory timelines.
Regular reviews, ideally quarterly, can help organizations identify inefficiencies and adapt to changing regulatory landscapes. Continuous improvement ensures that processes remain aligned with best practices and compliance requirements.
Yes, external consultants can provide valuable expertise and insights into navigating complex regulatory environments. Their experience can help organizations avoid common pitfalls and expedite the approval process.
Effective stakeholder communication is crucial for aligning expectations and ensuring timely responses. Clear communication helps mitigate misunderstandings and fosters collaboration between internal teams and regulatory bodies.
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected
NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)