Data Security is crucial for safeguarding sensitive information and maintaining customer trust.
A robust data security framework influences compliance, operational efficiency, and overall financial health.
Organizations that prioritize data security can reduce the risk of breaches, which often lead to significant financial losses and reputational damage.
Implementing strong data protection measures can also enhance data-driven decision-making and improve business outcomes.
As cyber threats evolve, a proactive approach to data security becomes essential for strategic alignment and long-term success.
High values in data security indicate strong protection measures and low vulnerability to breaches. Conversely, low values may signal inadequate security protocols, increasing the risk of data loss or theft. Ideal targets should align with industry standards and best practices to ensure robust protection against emerging threats.
We have 21 relevant benchmarks in our benchmarks database.
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | days | threshold | Effective April 29, 2019 | Federal agencies (vulnerability remediation) | public sector | United States |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | count | average; median | last 12 months | UK businesses and charities that were victims of cyber crime | cross-industry | United Kingdom |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | share | last 12 months | UK businesses and charities | cross-industry | United Kingdom |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | share | past year | UK businesses and charities | cross-industry | United Kingdom |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | days | median | 2023 | intrusions investigated by Mandiant (detected internally) | cross-industry | global |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | days | median | 2023 | intrusions investigated by Mandiant | cross-industry | global |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | USD | median; range | past three years | ransomware and extortion breaches (FBI IC3 ransomware compla | cross-industry |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | share | 2024 DBIR incident dataset (November 1, 2022, to October 31, | confirmed data breaches | cross-industry |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | share | 2024 DBIR incident dataset (November 1, 2022, to October 31, | confirmed data breaches | cross-industry |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | share | 2024 DBIR incident dataset (November 1, 2022, to October 31, | confirmed data breaches | cross-industry | global |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | days | median | 2024 DBIR incident dataset (November 1, 2022, to October 31, | vulnerabilities observed via internet honeypots (first scan | cross-industry |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | USD | average | March 2023 and February 2024 | organizations impacted by data breaches | cross-industry | global | 604 organizations |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | days | average | March 2023 and February 2024 | data breaches involving shadow data | cross-industry | global | 604 organizations |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | USD | average | March 2023 and February 2024 | data breaches involving shadow data | cross-industry | global | 604 organizations |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | share | March 2023 and February 2024 | data breaches | cross-industry | global | 604 organizations |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | USD | average | March 2023 and February 2024 | data breaches with malicious insider attacks | cross-industry | global | 604 organizations |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | days | average | March 2023 and February 2024 | data breaches with social engineering as the attack vector | cross-industry | global | 604 organizations |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | days | average | March 2023 and February 2024 | data breaches with phishing as the attack vector | cross-industry | global | 604 organizations |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | days | average | March 2023 and February 2024 | data breaches involving stolen or compromised credentials | cross-industry | global | 604 organizations |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | days | mean | March 2023 and February 2024 | data breaches | cross-industry | global | 604 organizations |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | USD | average | March 2023 and February 2024 | organizations impacted by data breaches | cross-industry | global | 604 organizations |
Many organizations underestimate the importance of data security, leading to vulnerabilities that can be exploited.
Enhancing data security requires a multifaceted approach that addresses both technology and human factors.
A leading financial services firm faced escalating cyber threats, prompting a reevaluation of its data security measures. With a data security score of 65, the organization recognized the need for immediate action to protect sensitive client information and maintain regulatory compliance. The firm initiated a comprehensive data security overhaul, focusing on employee training, technology upgrades, and vendor assessments.
The initiative included implementing multi-factor authentication across all systems and conducting quarterly security training sessions for all employees. Additionally, the firm engaged third-party security experts to perform regular audits and identify vulnerabilities in their systems. This proactive approach not only improved their security posture but also fostered a culture of accountability among employees.
Within a year, the firm’s data security score improved to 85, significantly reducing the risk of breaches. The enhanced security measures also led to increased client trust, resulting in a 15% growth in new accounts. As a result, the organization not only safeguarded its reputation but also positioned itself as a leader in data security within the financial sector.
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.
The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.
When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.
Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.
Got a question? Email us at [email protected].
Data security protects sensitive information from unauthorized access and breaches. It is essential for maintaining customer trust and ensuring compliance with regulations.
Regular assessments should occur at least annually, with more frequent evaluations recommended for organizations in high-risk industries. Continuous monitoring helps identify vulnerabilities promptly.
Common threats include phishing attacks, malware, and insider threats. Organizations must remain vigilant against evolving tactics used by cybercriminals.
Regular training sessions and awareness campaigns can significantly enhance employee understanding of data security risks. Engaging employees in discussions about security practices fosters a culture of vigilance.
Vendors can introduce vulnerabilities if their security measures are inadequate. Organizations must assess vendor security practices to mitigate risks associated with third-party access.
A data breach response plan outlines the steps an organization should take in the event of a breach. It includes communication strategies, containment measures, and recovery processes to minimize damage.
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected
NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)