Debt-to-Equity Ratio (D/E) is a critical financial ratio that reflects a company's financial leverage and overall financial health.
It influences key business outcomes such as risk management, capital structure optimization, and investment attractiveness.
A high D/E ratio may indicate over-leverage, potentially leading to increased financial risk, while a low ratio suggests a conservative approach to financing.
Executives can use this metric to make data-driven decisions regarding capital allocation and strategic alignment.
Effective management reporting on D/E can enhance forecasting accuracy and improve operational efficiency.
By benchmarking against industry standards, organizations can track results and identify areas for improvement.
Debt-to-Equity Ratio Benchmarking belongs to KPI Depot's Competitive Benchmarking KPI group, where it ranks fortieth, a supporting metric well below the group's headline measures. The group leads with Market Share Growth, Competitive Sales Growth Rate, and Customer Acquisition Cost, then moves through the profitability comparisons, Gross Margin Benchmarking and Benchmarked Profit Margins. This KPI sits on the financial perspective of the balanced scorecard, and it is a lagging one, a reading of capital structure that reflects financing decisions already made rather than one that predicts the next quarter.
What it adds to the group is a leverage lens the profitability metrics lack. Two competitors can post similar margins and stand on very different amounts of debt, and only a leverage comparison shows it. The tension is with Benchmarked Profit Margins and the group's return comparisons. A company can flatter its return on equity by carrying more debt, which raises this ratio at the same time. Read Debt-to-Equity Ratio Benchmarking alongside Benchmarked Profit Margins so a leveraged return is not mistaken for operating strength, because the two together separate a business that earns well from one that has simply borrowed more to look like it does.
The inputs are two balance-sheet lines, total liabilities and shareholder equity, so the metric is easy to compute and easy to compute inconsistently. The judgment is in what you feed it.
Settle the definitional forks before benchmarking anything. Equity can be taken at book value or market value, and the choice changes the ratio and its meaning: book reflects accounting history, market reflects what investors think the equity is worth now. Debt can be all liabilities or only interest-bearing debt, and it can be gross or net of cash. Leases and pension liabilities sit in or out. A benchmark is only valid against companies measured the same way on every one of these.
Segment by industry and capital intensity, never across them casually. Capital-heavy sectors and financial firms run structurally higher leverage, so a cross-industry comparison usually measures the industry, not the company. Watch a few instrumentation traps: thin, negative, or recently written-down equity makes the ratio explode or flip sign and read as noise; off-balance-sheet obligations understate real leverage; and a snapshot taken after a large buyback or issuance reflects a moment rather than a norm. Where equity is distorted, a net-debt-to-EBITDA view often tells a cleaner story and is worth carrying beside this one.
Many organizations overlook the implications of a high D/E ratio, which can signal potential insolvency risks.
Enhancing the Debt-to-Equity Ratio requires a strategic approach to both debt management and equity growth.
We have 17 relevant benchmarks in our benchmarks database.
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Telecom. Equipment | US | 61 |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Beverage (Soft) | US | 29 |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Telecom (Wireless) | US | 11 |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Transportation | US | 21 |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Software (System & Application) | US | 333 |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Semiconductor | US | 63 |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Retail (General) | US | 24 |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Restaurant/Dining | US | 62 |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Air Transport | US | 24 |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Utility (General) | US | 14 |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | R.E.I.T. | US | 192 |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Telecom. Services | US | 32 |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Broadcasting | US | 22 |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Banks (Regional) | US | 591 |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Bank (Money Center) | US | 15 |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Total Market (without financials) | US | 4935 |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Total Market | US | 6062 |
Browse the Top Benchmarked KPIs in Competitive Benchmarking
Every benchmark KPI Depot tracks for this metric comes from one compiler, the NYU Stern School of Business dataset, drawn from US firms at a single snapshot. That is useful and also the first caution: a one-source, one-date, one-country picture moves as markets move, and a leverage figure captured in one month can read differently a quarter later. Treat it as a reference point, not a settled fact, and pair it with a second source before drawing conclusions.
Where the source itself divides is instructive. It reports figures by industry and offers the total market both with and without financial firms. That split matters because banks and other financial companies carry leverage that is structural: deposits and funding behave nothing like corporate borrowing, which is why the source pulls them out. Comparing an industrial company against a total-market figure that still includes financials quietly stacks the deck. Sample sizes also swing widely between industries, from barely a dozen firms in some to several thousand in others, so a thinly populated industry average leans on a handful of companies and shifts if one of them does.
The deeper forks are definitional, and they are where two authoritative-looking figures stop agreeing. Debt-to-equity can be built on book equity or market equity, and the two diverge sharply for the same company. Debt can mean all liabilities or only interest-bearing borrowing, gross or net of cash. Leases and pension obligations may or may not be counted. Before trusting any leverage benchmark, confirm book versus market equity, gross versus net debt, whether leases are in, whether financials sit in the peer set, and the date of the snapshot. Match those and a comparison means something. Miss one and the numbers were never speaking the same language.
In the Competitive Benchmarking KPI group, the live objective is to sharpen market positioning by outperforming competitors across key financial metrics, with key results that benchmark returns and margins against named peer sets. Debt-to-Equity Ratio Benchmarking ladders to that objective as a capital-structure key result: moving the company's leverage toward a deliberate position relative to its peer set, rather than letting it drift.
Keep it directional and keep it honest about why. A team might commit to bringing leverage closer to the peer median where it currently sits above, or to holding a leverage advantage while return benchmarks catch up. The point is to pair it with the group's profitability comparisons in the same objective, so leverage is managed as a chosen position and not as a lever pulled quietly to make return on equity look competitive. Any figure attached is an illustrative target the team sets for itself, not a benchmark read off the dataset.
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.
The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.
When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.
Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.
Got a question? Email us at [email protected].
A good D/E ratio typically falls below 1.5, indicating a balanced approach to leveraging debt and equity. However, ideal levels can vary significantly by industry, so benchmarking against peers is crucial.
A high D/E ratio can increase financial risk, making it harder to secure additional financing. It may also lead to higher interest rates and reduced investor confidence, impacting stock performance.
Companies can lower their D/E ratio by paying down debt, increasing equity through retained earnings, or issuing new shares. Each strategy has implications for cash flow and shareholder value.
Not necessarily. While a low D/E ratio indicates lower financial risk, it may also suggest underutilization of debt for growth. Companies must balance risk and opportunity based on their strategic goals.
Regular reviews are essential, especially during periods of significant financial activity or market changes. Quarterly assessments can help identify trends and inform strategic decisions.
Yes, if the company has substantial debt, it can still present a high D/E ratio despite high equity levels. The ratio is a reflection of the relationship between total debt and total equity.
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected
NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)