Encryption coverage is crucial for safeguarding sensitive data, influencing operational efficiency and financial health.
A robust encryption strategy minimizes risks associated with data breaches, enhancing customer trust and compliance with regulations.
Organizations with high encryption coverage can better leverage business intelligence, as they protect critical information while enabling data-driven decision-making.
This KPI also serves as a leading indicator of a company's commitment to cybersecurity, which can improve overall ROI metrics.
By tracking encryption coverage, executives can ensure strategic alignment with industry standards and mitigate potential financial losses from data exposure.
High encryption coverage indicates strong data protection measures, while low coverage may expose vulnerabilities. Ideal targets typically exceed 90% coverage across all sensitive data types.
We have 15 relevant benchmarks in our benchmarks database.
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent of organizations | distribution slice | May 23–29, 2025 | US organizations represented by IT security decision makers | United States | 200 IT security decision makers |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent of organizations | survey result | May 23–29, 2025 | US organizations represented by IT security decision makers | United States | 200 IT security decision makers |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent of organizations | survey result | May 2025 | UK organizations represented by IT security decision makers | United Kingdom | 200 IT security decision makers |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent of organizations | survey result | May 2025 | UK organizations represented by IT security decision makers | United Kingdom | 200 IT security decision makers |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent of organizations | survey result | May 2025 | UK organizations represented by IT security decision makers | United Kingdom | 200 IT security decision makers |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent of respondents | distribution slice | Q2 2024 | business decision-makers and IT professionals in German comp | Germany |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent of companies | survey result | Q2 2024 | retail companies in Germany | retail sector | Germany |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent of companies | survey result | Q2 2024 | banks and insurance companies in Germany | banks and insurance companies | Germany |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent of organizations | threshold | 2021 | multicloud organizations in the Thales Cloud Security Study | health care, financial services, retail, technology, and fed | Australia, Brazil, France, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Japan, | over 2,600 executives |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent of organizations | threshold | 2021 | organizations in the Thales Cloud Security Study | health care, financial services, retail, technology, and fed | Australia, Brazil, France, Germany, Hong Kong, India, Japan, | over 2,600 executives |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent of organizations | distribution slice | October 23–November 16, 2015 | AIIM community organizations | 202 organizations |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent of organizations | distribution slice | October 23–November 16, 2015 | AIIM community organizations | 202 organizations |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent of organizations | distribution slice | October 23–November 16, 2015 | AIIM community organizations | 202 organizations |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent of organizations | distribution slice | October 23–November 16, 2015 | AIIM community organizations | 202 organizations |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent of organizations | distribution slice | October 23–November 16, 2015 | AIIM community organizations | 202 organizations |
Many organizations underestimate the importance of comprehensive encryption coverage, leading to significant data vulnerabilities.
Enhancing encryption coverage requires a proactive approach to data protection and employee engagement.
A leading financial institution faced increasing scrutiny over its data security measures, with encryption coverage lagging at 65%. This gap exposed the organization to potential regulatory fines and reputational damage. To address this, the bank initiated a comprehensive encryption enhancement project, led by its Chief Information Security Officer. The project included upgrading encryption protocols, implementing full-disk encryption for all devices, and ensuring data in transit was secured with advanced encryption standards.
Within a year, encryption coverage improved to 92%, significantly reducing the risk of data breaches. The bank also established a continuous training program for employees, emphasizing the importance of data security. As a result, the institution not only met compliance requirements but also regained customer trust, leading to a 15% increase in new account openings. The success of this initiative positioned the bank as a leader in data security within the financial sector, showcasing its commitment to protecting client information.
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.
The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.
When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.
Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.
Got a question? Email us at [email protected].
Encryption coverage refers to the percentage of sensitive data that is encrypted within an organization. It serves as a critical measure of data protection and security posture.
High encryption coverage protects sensitive information from unauthorized access and data breaches. It also helps organizations comply with regulatory requirements and enhances customer trust.
Improving encryption coverage involves implementing end-to-end encryption, updating protocols regularly, and conducting employee training. Regular audits also help identify areas needing enhancement.
Low encryption coverage exposes organizations to data breaches, regulatory fines, and reputational damage. It can also lead to financial losses due to compromised sensitive information.
Encryption coverage should be audited at least annually, or more frequently if significant changes occur in data handling practices. Regular audits ensure compliance and identify vulnerabilities.
While encryption coverage is a key aspect of data security, it is not the only measure. Comprehensive data security includes access controls, monitoring, and incident response strategies.
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected
NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)