Gross Profit Margin (GPM) is a critical financial ratio that reflects a company's financial health by measuring the percentage of revenue that exceeds the cost of goods sold.
This KPI directly influences profitability, pricing strategies, and operational efficiency.
A higher GPM indicates effective cost control and pricing power, while a lower margin may signal inefficiencies or pricing pressures.
Companies can leverage GPM to make data-driven decisions that align with strategic goals.
Monitoring this metric helps executives track results and forecast future performance.
Ultimately, GPM is essential for assessing overall business outcomes and ensuring long-term sustainability.
High Gross Profit Margin values indicate strong pricing strategies and effective cost management. Conversely, low values may suggest issues with production efficiency or pricing strategies. Ideal targets typically vary by industry, but a GPM above 40% is often considered healthy for many sectors.
We have 13 relevant benchmarks in our benchmarks database.
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | 2. Quarter 2025, TTM | publicly traded companies | Total Market |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Environmental & Waste Services | US | 50 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Business & Consumer Services | US | 152 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Healthcare Support Services | US | 113 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Aerospace/Defense | US | 67 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Food Processing | US | 77 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Electrical Equipment | US | 101 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Computers/Peripherals | US | 35 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Apparel | US | 37 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Beverage (Alcoholic) | US | 18 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Beverage (Soft) | US | 29 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Drugs (Biotechnology) | US | 535 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Drugs (Pharmaceutical) | US | 231 firms |
Many organizations overlook the nuances of Gross Profit Margin, leading to misguided strategies that can erode profitability.
Enhancing Gross Profit Margin requires a multifaceted approach that targets both revenue and costs.
A leading consumer electronics company, with annual revenues of $1B, faced declining Gross Profit Margins due to rising component costs and increased competition. Over 18 months, their GPM had dropped from 45% to 32%, prompting urgent action from the executive team. The CFO initiated a comprehensive review of the supply chain and pricing strategies, focusing on renegotiating contracts with suppliers and optimizing production processes.
The company implemented a new pricing strategy that included value-based pricing, allowing them to capture higher margins on premium products. Additionally, they adopted advanced analytics to forecast demand more accurately, reducing excess inventory and associated costs.
Within a year, the company successfully raised its GPM back to 40%, recovering lost profitability and enabling reinvestment in product innovation. The strategic changes not only improved financial health but also enhanced the company's competitive position in the market, allowing for sustained growth and profitability.
Trusted by organizations worldwide, KPI Depot is the most comprehensive KPI database available.
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.
The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.
When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.
Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.
Got a question? Email us at [email protected].
A good Gross Profit Margin typically varies by industry, but many companies aim for a margin above 40%. Higher margins indicate better pricing power and cost control, which are crucial for long-term success.
Improving Gross Profit Margin involves optimizing pricing strategies, reducing production costs, and enhancing operational efficiency. Regularly reviewing these areas ensures alignment with market conditions and business objectives.
No, Gross Profit Margin measures the percentage of revenue remaining after deducting the cost of goods sold, while net profit margin accounts for all expenses, including operating and non-operating costs. Both metrics provide valuable insights into financial health.
Regular reviews are essential, ideally on a quarterly basis. This frequency allows businesses to respond quickly to market changes and adjust strategies accordingly.
Yes, a low Gross Profit Margin can be improved through strategic pricing adjustments, cost control measures, and operational enhancements. Identifying the root causes of low margins is crucial for effective improvement.
Several factors influence Gross Profit Margin, including production costs, pricing strategies, market competition, and operational efficiency. Understanding these elements helps businesses make informed decisions to enhance profitability.
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected
NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)