Gross Profit Margin (GPM) is a critical financial ratio that reflects a company's financial health by measuring the percentage of revenue that exceeds the cost of goods sold.
This KPI directly influences profitability, pricing strategies, and operational efficiency.
A higher GPM indicates effective cost control and pricing power, while a lower margin may signal inefficiencies or pricing pressures.
Companies can leverage GPM to make data-driven decisions that align with strategic goals.
Monitoring this metric helps executives track results and forecast future performance.
Ultimately, GPM is essential for assessing overall business outcomes and ensuring long-term sustainability.
Gross Profit Margin is a core profitability metric that turns up across sixteen KPI groups. Its home groups, where it ranks highest, cluster around cost and financial performance. In Building Materials it ranks second, behind Revenue Growth Rate and ahead of Net Profit Margin and Operating Profit Margin. In Cost Accounting it also ranks second, led by Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) and sitting beside Contribution Margin and Contribution Margin Ratio. It ranks third in Financial Reporting, after Revenue Growth Rate and Net Profit Margin, and third again in Food and Beverage Services, behind Food Cost Percentage and Labor Cost Percentage.
Beyond those four, it appears in a dozen more KPI groups spanning finance and specific industries, from General Ledger Accounting to Restaurants. The pattern holds wherever cost of goods sold is a live concern: this is a lagging financial outcome that captures how much of each revenue dollar survives after the cost of goods sold. On the balanced scorecard it belongs to the financial perspective.
The useful tension is margin against growth and against the fuller profit picture. Chasing Revenue Growth Rate through discounting or a push into lower-margin lines can lift the top line while quietly compressing gross margin. And because gross margin ignores operating expense, a healthy gross figure can sit above a weak Net Profit Margin. Read Gross Profit Margin against Revenue Growth Rate and Net Profit Margin so it is never optimized in isolation.
The formula is gross profit over total revenue, expressed as a percentage. The arithmetic is trivial; the definitional forks are where the work sits. First, fix what cost of goods sold contains: whether direct labor, depreciation on production assets, freight, and inbound logistics are in or out. Second, decide whether revenue is gross or net of returns, allowances, and discounts. Third, settle the treatment of any below-the-line reclassifications so the ratio stays stable from one period to the next.
The data comes from the general ledger, and consistent cost mapping is what makes the figure trustworthy. Segment it by product line, channel, and region, because a blended gross margin hides mix effects: a shift toward lower-margin products can drag the total down even while every individual line holds its own margin.
Two pitfalls recur. Comparing across companies or industries without normalizing the cost-of-goods definition invites a false read, and taking a blended margin at face value without watching product mix does the same. Pair it with Net Profit Margin so operating cost never drops out of view.
Many organizations overlook the nuances of Gross Profit Margin, leading to misguided strategies that can erode profitability.
Enhancing Gross Profit Margin requires a multifaceted approach that targets both revenue and costs.
We have 13 relevant benchmarks in our benchmarks database.
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | 2. Quarter 2025, TTM | publicly traded companies | Total Market |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Environmental & Waste Services | US | 50 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Business & Consumer Services | US | 152 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Healthcare Support Services | US | 113 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Aerospace/Defense | US | 67 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Food Processing | US | 77 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Electrical Equipment | US | 101 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Computers/Peripherals | US | 35 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Apparel | US | 37 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Beverage (Alcoholic) | US | 18 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Beverage (Soft) | US | 29 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Drugs (Biotechnology) | US | 535 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | as of January 2025 | firms | Drugs (Pharmaceutical) | US | 231 firms |
Browse the Top Benchmarked KPIs in Building Materials
The sources that track this metric diverge mainly on two axes: which industry they cut the data by, and what they let into the cost of goods sold. Those two choices, more than anything else, explain why two published figures can look nothing alike.
The Aswath Damodaran dataset, the NYU Stern industry compilation covering US firms, reports gross margin separately for many industries, from Aerospace/Defense to Food Processing to Apparel, Beverage, Computers/Peripherals, and Pharmaceuticals. That structure makes the central point plain: gross margin is industry-bound, and a figure for one sector says almost nothing about another. CSIMarket takes a different lens, reporting at a total-market level across publicly traded companies on a trailing-twelve-month basis rather than breaking the picture out industry by industry.
The deeper fork is definitional. Firms and datasets differ on whether depreciation on production assets, direct labor, and certain overhead sit inside the cost of goods sold or below the gross line, and that single choice moves the margin without any change in the underlying business. Time basis compounds it, since a trailing-twelve-month view answers a different question than an as-of-date snapshot. Before setting any external gross-margin figure next to your own, match the industry, match the cost-of-goods definition, and match the period; skip any of the three and the comparison misleads.
In the Cost Accounting KPI group, Gross Profit Margin shows up as a named key result under an objective to enhance profitability insights by refining cost-structure accuracy, sitting beside Cost of Goods Sold (COGS) and Contribution Margin. Frame it directionally: lift gross margin by improving the cost structure while revenue holds, rather than by cutting corners that resurface later as returns or quality problems.
It plays a similar role in the Building Materials KPI group, where it is a key result under a financial-performance objective alongside Revenue Growth Rate and Net Profit Margin. Any target a team sets here is an internal goal tied to its own cost base and industry, not a figure lifted from outside.
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.
The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.
When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.
Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.
Got a question? Email us at [email protected].
A good Gross Profit Margin typically varies by industry, but many companies aim for a margin above 40%. Higher margins indicate better pricing power and cost control, which are crucial for long-term success.
Improving Gross Profit Margin involves optimizing pricing strategies, reducing production costs, and enhancing operational efficiency. Regularly reviewing these areas ensures alignment with market conditions and business objectives.
No, Gross Profit Margin measures the percentage of revenue remaining after deducting the cost of goods sold, while net profit margin accounts for all expenses, including operating and non-operating costs. Both metrics provide valuable insights into financial health.
Regular reviews are essential, ideally on a quarterly basis. This frequency allows businesses to respond quickly to market changes and adjust strategies accordingly.
Yes, a low Gross Profit Margin can be improved through strategic pricing adjustments, cost control measures, and operational enhancements. Identifying the root causes of low margins is crucial for effective improvement.
Several factors influence Gross Profit Margin, including production costs, pricing strategies, market competition, and operational efficiency. Understanding these elements helps businesses make informed decisions to enhance profitability.
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected
NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)