In-app Feedback Rate serves as a vital performance indicator for understanding user satisfaction and engagement within applications.
High feedback rates often correlate with improved product iterations and enhanced user experience, leading to increased retention and revenue growth.
This KPI empowers organizations to make data-driven decisions that align with strategic goals.
By tracking this metric, companies can identify pain points and opportunities for operational efficiency.
A robust in-app feedback mechanism can also enhance customer loyalty and drive long-term business outcomes.
Ultimately, it supports a culture of continuous improvement and innovation.
High in-app feedback rates indicate strong user engagement and satisfaction, suggesting that users feel comfortable sharing their thoughts. Conversely, low rates may signal disengagement or a lack of effective feedback mechanisms. Ideal targets typically exceed a threshold of 15% feedback submission from active users.
We have 13 relevant benchmarks in our benchmarks database.
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | January 2019 through December 2019 | Note-linked consumer surveys | Food and Drink, Shopping, Travel, Finance, Media, and Lifest | global (Android) | 812 iOS and Android apps with 5,000+ active users |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | in-app surveys | cross-industry |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | January 2019 through December 2019 | consumer surveys | Food and Drink, Shopping, Travel, Finance, Media, and Lifest | global (Android) | 812 iOS and Android apps with 5,000+ active users |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | April 2015 to April 2016 | people prompted to take an in-app survey | Shopping apps | around 1,000 mobile apps |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | April 2015 to April 2016 | people prompted to take an in-app survey | Entertainment apps | around 1,000 mobile apps |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | April 2015 to April 2016 | people prompted to take an in-app survey | all app categories | around 1,000 mobile apps |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | 2025 | in-app survey views | SaaS or digital products |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | 2025 | in-app survey views | SaaS or digital products | 254 surveys |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | 2025 | CSAT in-app survey views | SaaS or digital products | 259 in-app CSAT surveys; 4,575,391 views; 636,278 responses |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | 2025 | NPS in-app survey views | SaaS or digital products | 283 in-app NPS surveys; 5,091,330 views; 747,099 responses |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | 2025 | in-app survey views | SaaS or digital products | 1,382 in-app surveys |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | 2025 | in-app survey views | SaaS or digital products | 1,382 in-app surveys |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | 2025 | in-app survey views | SaaS or digital products | 1,382 in-app surveys; 50,305,103 views; 6,137,194 survey res |
Many organizations underestimate the importance of user feedback, leading to missed opportunities for product enhancement and customer satisfaction.
Enhancing the in-app feedback rate requires a strategic focus on user engagement and streamlined processes.
A leading mobile gaming company faced declining user retention rates, prompting a reevaluation of its in-app feedback strategy. The firm discovered that its in-app Feedback Rate had plummeted to 8%, indicating a disconnect between user experience and engagement. To address this, the company launched a targeted initiative called "Player Voice," aimed at revitalizing user interaction through feedback mechanisms.
The initiative introduced streamlined feedback prompts after gameplay sessions, allowing users to share their thoughts quickly. Additionally, the company implemented a robust analytics framework to track feedback trends and identify common pain points. Within months, the in-app Feedback Rate surged to 18%, providing valuable insights that informed game updates and feature releases.
As a result, user retention improved by 25%, and the company saw a significant uptick in positive reviews on app stores. The enhanced feedback loop not only fostered a sense of community among players but also positioned the company as responsive and user-focused. This shift led to a notable increase in revenue, as satisfied users were more likely to make in-game purchases and recommend the game to others.
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.
The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.
When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.
Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.
Got a question? Email us at [email protected].
A good in-app feedback rate typically exceeds 15%. Rates above this threshold indicate strong user engagement and satisfaction.
Implementing simple feedback prompts at key moments can encourage participation. Offering incentives, such as discounts or exclusive content, can also boost response rates.
Focus on collecting qualitative feedback regarding user experience and quantitative ratings for specific features. This combination provides a comprehensive view of user sentiment.
Regular analysis, ideally monthly, helps identify trends and actionable insights. Establishing a routine for review ensures that user feedback informs product development.
Yes, low feedback rates can signal disengagement or dissatisfaction. It's essential to investigate potential barriers preventing users from providing feedback.
Various analytics tools and platforms specialize in user feedback collection and analysis. These tools can streamline the process and provide valuable insights into user behavior.
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected
NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)