Internal Audit Findings Resolution Rate KPI

What is Internal Audit Findings Resolution Rate?
The rate at which internal audit findings are resolved.

View Benchmarks




Internal Audit Findings Resolution Rate is crucial for assessing an organization's operational efficiency and risk management effectiveness.

A high resolution rate indicates robust internal controls and proactive management, leading to improved financial health and reduced compliance risks.

Conversely, a low rate may signal systemic issues that could jeopardize business outcomes.

This KPI influences strategic alignment, cost control metrics, and overall performance indicators.

Organizations that prioritize this metric can enhance their reporting dashboard and drive data-driven decisions, ultimately improving ROI and stakeholder trust.

Internal Audit Findings Resolution Rate Interpretation

High values reflect effective resolution processes and strong governance, while low values may indicate unresolved issues or inadequate follow-up. Ideal targets typically hover above 90%, signaling a commitment to continuous improvement and operational excellence.

  • 90% and above – Exemplary performance; strong internal controls
  • 70%–89% – Acceptable; room for improvement exists
  • Below 70% – Concerning; immediate action required

Internal Audit Findings Resolution Rate Benchmarks

We have 7 relevant benchmarks in our benchmarks database.

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent benchmark threshold state government audit office biennial measurement recommendations public sector United States, Montana

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 34,821 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent result Commonwealth entities within 24 months of reporting agreed moderate or significant findings in performance state public sector Australia

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 34,821 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent result Commonwealth entities within 24 months of report presentation performance audit recommendations public sector Australia

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 34,821 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent distribution hospital and health services outstanding recommendations from prior years assessed in 202 recommendations public sector Queensland, Australia 15 HHSs, 50 recommendations

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 34,821 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent distribution departments 2016–17 to 2023–24 recommendations public sector Queensland, Australia 22 departments, 200 recommendations

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 34,821 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent distribution local governments 2016–17 to 2023–24 recommendations public sector Queensland, Australia 27 local governments, 72 recommendations

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 34,821 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent distribution public sector entities 2016–17 to 2023–24 recommendations public sector Queensland, Australia 79 entities, 362 recommendations

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 34,821 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Common Pitfalls

Many organizations overlook the importance of timely follow-up on audit findings, which can lead to unresolved issues festering and impacting overall performance.

  • Failing to assign clear ownership for findings can create ambiguity, resulting in delays in resolution. Without accountability, issues may linger, eroding trust in the audit process.
  • Neglecting to integrate findings into the strategic planning process can limit organizational learning. If insights from audits aren't leveraged, opportunities for improvement may be missed.
  • Overcomplicating the reporting process can obscure critical insights. A convoluted dashboard may prevent stakeholders from grasping the urgency of issues needing resolution.
  • Inadequate training for staff on audit processes can lead to misunderstandings. Employees may not fully grasp the importance of addressing findings, resulting in poor follow-through.

KPI Depot is trusted by consulting, strategy, finance, and analytics teams at leading organizations worldwide, including those listed below.

AAMC Accenture AXA Bristol Myers Squibb Capgemini DBS Bank Dell Delta Emirates Global Aluminum EY GSK GlaskoSmithKline Honeywell IBM Mitre Northrup Grumman Novo Nordisk NTT Data PepsiCo Samsung Suntory TCS Tata Consultancy Services Vodafone

Improvement Levers

Enhancing the resolution rate of internal audit findings requires a focused approach on accountability and communication.

  • Establish clear ownership for each finding to ensure accountability. Assigning specific individuals or teams can facilitate timely follow-up and resolution.
  • Integrate audit findings into regular management meetings to maintain visibility. This ensures that issues are discussed and prioritized consistently, fostering a culture of accountability.
  • Simplify reporting dashboards to highlight key findings and trends. A streamlined approach allows stakeholders to quickly grasp the status of resolutions and necessary actions.
  • Provide ongoing training for staff on the importance of audit findings. Empowering employees with knowledge can enhance engagement and commitment to addressing issues.

Internal Audit Findings Resolution Rate Case Study Example

A mid-sized financial services firm faced challenges with its Internal Audit Findings Resolution Rate, which had stagnated at 65%. This situation raised concerns among executives about compliance and operational risks. To address this, the firm initiated a comprehensive review of its audit processes, focusing on accountability and communication. They implemented a new tracking system that assigned ownership for each finding and set up regular check-ins to monitor progress.

Within 6 months, the resolution rate climbed to 85%. The firm also integrated audit findings into its strategic planning sessions, ensuring that lessons learned informed future initiatives. This alignment not only improved the resolution rate but also enhanced overall operational efficiency.

As a result, the firm reported a significant reduction in compliance-related issues, leading to improved stakeholder confidence. The initiative also fostered a culture of continuous improvement, where employees felt empowered to address findings proactively.

Related KPIs


What is the standard formula?
(Resolved Audit Findings / Total Audit Findings) * 100


Unlock all 35,098 source-attributed benchmarks.
Comparable benchmark data services start at $2,400 per year.
See all 7 benchmarks for Internal Audit Findings Resolution Rate
Access to 35,098 benchmarks
Access to 24,181 KPIs
Interactive Strategy Maps on every plan
13 attributes per KPI (view)

Compare Plans

KPI Categories

This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:



KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.

The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.

When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.

Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.

Got a question? Email us at [email protected].

FAQs about Internal Audit Findings Resolution Rate

What is a good Internal Audit Findings Resolution Rate?

A resolution rate above 90% is generally considered excellent. This indicates that the organization effectively addresses and resolves identified issues in a timely manner.

How often should audit findings be reviewed?

Regular reviews, ideally quarterly, help maintain focus on outstanding issues. Frequent check-ins ensure that findings remain a priority and are addressed promptly.

What tools can help track audit findings?

Dedicated audit management software can streamline tracking and reporting. These tools often provide dashboards that visualize progress and highlight areas needing attention.

Can a low resolution rate impact financial performance?

Yes, unresolved audit findings can lead to increased compliance risks and operational inefficiencies. This may ultimately affect the organization's financial health and stakeholder trust.

How can we improve our resolution rate?

Implementing clear ownership for findings and simplifying reporting processes can significantly enhance resolution rates. Regular training and communication also play a vital role in fostering accountability.

Is it necessary to involve all departments in the audit process?

Yes, involving all relevant departments ensures comprehensive coverage of findings. Cross-departmental collaboration can lead to more effective resolutions and improved organizational learning.



Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.

KPI Definition

A clear explanation of what the KPI measures

Potential Business Insights

The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI

Measurement Approach

An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI

Standard Formula

The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI

Trend Analysis

Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts

Diagnostic Questions

Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve

Actionable Tips

Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions

Visualization Suggestions

Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making

Risk Warnings

Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention

Tools & Technologies

Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively

Integration Points

How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management

Change Impact

Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected

BSC Perspective

NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)


Compare Our Plans


Explore KPI Depot by Function & Industry