Landfill Diversion Rate is a critical KPI that measures the percentage of waste diverted from landfills through recycling, composting, and other recovery methods.
This metric directly influences operational efficiency, cost control, and sustainability initiatives.
Organizations with higher diversion rates often experience reduced disposal costs and improved environmental compliance.
Tracking this KPI enables businesses to align with regulatory standards and enhance their corporate social responsibility profile.
By focusing on this leading indicator, companies can drive strategic alignment and improve their overall financial health.
A robust diversion strategy can also lead to increased community support and brand loyalty.
Landfill Diversion Rate belongs to the Waste Management KPI group. That group leads with hazardous and medical waste safety and compliance: Hazardous Waste Disposal ranks first, followed by Medical Waste Disposal Safety, Hazardous Waste Treatment Efficiency, and Hazardous Waste Reduction Rate. Compliance with Waste Legislation, Waste Segregation Compliance, Waste Management Training Compliance, and Total Waste Generated fill out the priority order.
Within that group, Landfill Diversion Rate is ranked tenth. It plays a different role from the safety and compliance metrics above it. Those track what must not go wrong. This one tracks a direction of travel: how much waste is kept out of landfill through recycling, composting, or other means. It is the sustainability and circularity lens, and it reads as a leading operational metric.
On the balanced scorecard it sits in the internal perspective.
The tension worth naming runs between this metric and Total Waste Generated. The two share a denominator idea, since diversion is a share of what you generate. That link is exactly where the trap is. The diversion rate can climb while Total Waste Generated also climbs, because a larger share of a larger pile can still be diverted. A rising rate can therefore mask growing absolute waste, which is the opposite of what a sustainability program wants. There is an upstream dependency too: diversion only works if waste is sorted correctly in the first place, so Landfill Diversion Rate leans on Waste Segregation Compliance to hold up. Read the rate next to Total Waste Generated, never on its own.
The formula is total waste diverted from landfill divided by total waste generated, expressed as a proportion. The work is in deciding what goes into each side.
The data lives in hauler weigh tickets and scale records, which is where diverted and generated tonnage actually get captured.
The definitional forks that move the result:
The main pitfalls follow from those forks: counting collected-for-recycling rather than actually-recycled after contamination rejects, mixing weight and volume bases across periods, and leaving waste-to-energy treated ambiguously so the same operation reads as diversion one quarter and not the next.
Many organizations underestimate the complexity of waste diversion, leading to misguided strategies that fail to deliver results.
Enhancing landfill diversion requires a multi-faceted approach that engages both employees and external partners.
We have 2 relevant benchmarks in our benchmarks database.
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | 2018 | municipal solid waste | municipal solid waste management | United States |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | threshold | annual | solid waste | federal government operations | United States |
Browse the Top Benchmarked KPIs in Waste Management
One source is tracked for this metric: the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. It appears in two different contexts, municipal solid waste and federal government operations, and the scope changes what the numbers describe.
The catch is that "diverted" and "generated" are defined by scope. What counts as diverted under a municipal solid waste reading is not necessarily what counts under federal operations, and the same is true for what lands in the generated total.
Before trusting any external figure, a customer should verify:
Same agency, different scope, different definitions. Confirm those three points before comparing anything.
The Waste Management group's worked OKR examples center on hazardous and medical waste safety. The objective is safe, compliant treatment of hazardous and medical waste, with key results tied to Hazardous Waste Disposal compliance, Medical Waste Disposal Safety, and Hazardous Waste Treatment Efficiency. The group's best-practice note is to balance compliance against treatment efficiency for hazardous waste.
Landfill Diversion Rate is not one of those named key results. It ladders instead to a sustainability objective, one about reducing environmental impact and moving toward circular waste handling. Framed that way:
Always read the rate together with Total Waste Generated. On its own it can flatter a program that is quietly producing more waste every year.
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.
The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.
When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.
Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.
Got a question? Email us at [email protected].
A good landfill diversion rate typically exceeds 50%, with top-performing organizations achieving rates above 75%. These figures indicate effective waste management practices and a strong commitment to sustainability.
Tracking landfill diversion requires accurate data collection on waste generation and recycling efforts. Implementing a reporting dashboard can help organizations monitor progress and identify areas for improvement.
Improving landfill diversion can lead to reduced disposal costs, enhanced regulatory compliance, and a stronger corporate social responsibility profile. Additionally, it can boost brand loyalty and attract environmentally conscious customers.
Regular reviews of landfill diversion strategies are essential, ideally on a quarterly basis. This frequency allows organizations to adapt to changing regulations and market conditions while optimizing their waste management practices.
Yes, technology can significantly enhance landfill diversion rates by providing data-driven insights and streamlining waste management processes. Tools such as waste tracking software and reporting dashboards enable organizations to monitor performance and identify opportunities for improvement.
Employees play a crucial role in landfill diversion by adhering to waste management practices and actively participating in recycling initiatives. Training and engagement are key to fostering a culture of responsibility and commitment to sustainability efforts.
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected
NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)