Non-Energy Benefits (NEB) are crucial as they quantify the value derived from energy efficiency programs beyond mere energy savings.
They influence business outcomes like enhanced operational efficiency, improved financial health, and increased customer satisfaction.
By tracking NEB, organizations can make data-driven decisions that align with strategic goals.
This KPI serves as a leading indicator of overall program effectiveness, helping to justify investments and optimize resource allocation.
Understanding NEB allows executives to benchmark performance and assess ROI metrics more accurately.
Ultimately, it provides analytical insights that drive continuous improvement and stakeholder engagement.
High NEB values indicate successful energy efficiency initiatives that yield significant ancillary benefits, while low values may suggest missed opportunities or ineffective programs. Ideal targets vary by industry, but organizations should strive for consistent improvement over time.
We have 10 relevant benchmarks in our benchmarks database.
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | adder | energy efficiency resources and programs including low-incom | energy efficiency DSM programs | Vermont |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent and multiplier | adder and multiplier | low-income weatherization and other energy efficiency progra | energy efficiency DSM programs | New Mexico |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | adder | demand-side management programs | energy efficiency DSM programs | Iowa |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | adder | demand-side management programs and low-income DSM programs | energy efficiency DSM programs | Colorado |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | range and typical | weatherization-type programs | energy efficiency programs | across the nation | more than 20 studies |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | range and typical | participants in weatherization-type programs | energy efficiency programs | across the nation | more than 20 studies |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | range and typical | weatherization-type programs | energy efficiency programs | across the nation | more than 20 studies |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | times energy cost savings | up to | retrofitted existing buildings | buildings |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | $/ft2 | approximate | annual | retro-commissioned commercial buildings | buildings |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | range | green buildings | buildings |
Many organizations underestimate the importance of tracking Non-Energy Benefits, leading to a narrow focus on energy savings alone.
Enhancing Non-Energy Benefits requires a holistic approach that integrates various organizational functions and leverages data effectively.
A mid-sized manufacturing firm, specializing in consumer goods, faced challenges in quantifying the broader impacts of its energy efficiency initiatives. Initially focused solely on energy savings, the company realized it was missing out on significant Non-Energy Benefits that could enhance its overall value proposition. By adopting a comprehensive approach to NEB measurement, the firm engaged cross-functional teams to identify and quantify benefits such as improved employee morale, reduced maintenance costs, and enhanced brand reputation.
The initiative involved implementing a robust reporting dashboard that tracked NEB alongside traditional energy savings. This allowed the company to visualize the impacts of its energy efficiency programs on various business outcomes. As a result, the firm discovered that employee productivity had increased by 15% due to improved working conditions, and customer satisfaction ratings had risen significantly as well.
Within a year, the company reported a 25% increase in Non-Energy Benefits, which translated into a stronger ROI metric for its energy efficiency investments. The enhanced visibility of NEB not only justified further investments in sustainability initiatives but also positioned the firm as a leader in corporate responsibility within its industry. This strategic alignment with broader business goals ultimately contributed to improved financial health and market competitiveness.
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.
The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.
When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.
Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.
Got a question? Email us at [email protected].
Non-Energy Benefits refer to the additional value derived from energy efficiency programs beyond energy savings. These can include improvements in productivity, employee satisfaction, and operational efficiency.
Measuring Non-Energy Benefits involves both quantitative and qualitative assessments. Organizations can track metrics such as productivity gains, maintenance cost reductions, and customer satisfaction scores to evaluate NEB.
Non-Energy Benefits are crucial because they provide a more comprehensive view of the value generated by energy efficiency initiatives. They help justify investments and demonstrate the broader impact on business outcomes.
Non-Energy Benefits can significantly enhance the ROI of energy efficiency programs. By capturing these benefits, organizations can present a stronger business case for continued investment in sustainability initiatives.
Yes, Non-Energy Benefits can vary widely by industry. Different sectors may experience unique benefits based on their operational characteristics and stakeholder priorities.
Regular reviews of Non-Energy Benefits are essential for ongoing program optimization. Organizations should consider quarterly assessments to ensure alignment with changing business goals and market conditions.
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected
NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)