The Number of Cases Going to Trial serves as a critical performance indicator for legal firms, reflecting operational efficiency and the effectiveness of case management strategies.
A higher number of cases indicates a robust pipeline, which can enhance revenue generation and improve financial health.
Conversely, a lower number may signal inefficiencies or client dissatisfaction, impacting overall business outcomes.
Tracking this KPI allows firms to forecast resource needs and align strategic initiatives.
By analyzing trends, organizations can implement data-driven decisions to optimize their practices and enhance client service.
High values of cases going to trial often indicate a firm’s strong advocacy capabilities and a healthy client base. However, excessively high numbers may suggest unresolved disputes or inefficiencies in pre-trial processes. Low values could reflect successful settlements or a lack of client engagement. Ideal targets vary by practice area, but a balanced approach typically yields the best outcomes.
We have 1 relevant benchmark in our benchmarks database.
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | civil cases | legal litigation | United States |
Many firms misinterpret the number of cases going to trial as a standalone success metric, overlooking the quality and outcomes of those cases.
Enhancing the number of cases going to trial requires a multi-faceted approach focused on strategic alignment and operational improvements.
A mid-sized law firm, Legal Solutions, faced challenges with a stagnant number of cases going to trial, averaging just 12 cases annually. This limited their revenue potential and strained client relationships, as clients often sought more aggressive representation. In response, the firm initiated a comprehensive review of its case management processes, identifying bottlenecks in communication and case preparation.
The firm adopted a new case management system that integrated client feedback mechanisms and streamlined workflows. They also invested in training sessions for attorneys focused on trial advocacy and negotiation tactics. This dual approach not only improved internal efficiencies but also enhanced client satisfaction, as clients felt more engaged and informed throughout the process.
Within a year, the number of cases going to trial increased to 25, with a notable improvement in case outcomes. The firm reported a 30% increase in revenue attributed to higher trial activity and improved client retention rates. The success of this initiative positioned Legal Solutions as a more competitive player in the market, allowing them to attract new clients and expand their practice areas.
The firm's leadership recognized that the changes made were not just about increasing trial numbers but also about enhancing overall client experience. By fostering a culture of continuous improvement and responsiveness, they established a framework for sustainable growth and operational excellence.
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.
The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.
When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.
Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.
Got a question? Email us at [email protected].
A high number often reflects strong advocacy skills and a healthy client base. It may also indicate unresolved disputes that require attention.
Improving trial numbers involves enhancing case management processes and investing in attorney training. Fostering collaboration among teams can also yield better outcomes.
Not all cases should go to trial; many can be resolved through negotiation or settlement. Evaluating each case's merits is crucial for effective resource allocation.
Regular reviews, ideally quarterly, help identify trends and areas for improvement. This frequency allows for timely adjustments to strategies and practices.
Client feedback is vital for understanding their needs and expectations. Incorporating this feedback can enhance case strategies and improve overall satisfaction.
Yes, technology can streamline case management and enhance communication. Tools that automate processes can free up time for attorneys to focus on case strategy.
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected
NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)