Number of Cases Going to Trial

Related KPIs

Number of Cases Going to Trial Interpretation

High values of cases going to trial often indicate a firm’s strong advocacy capabilities and a healthy client base. However, excessively high numbers may suggest unresolved disputes or inefficiencies in pre-trial processes. Low values could reflect successful settlements or a lack of client engagement. Ideal targets vary by practice area, but a balanced approach typically yields the best outcomes.

• 0–10 cases – Efficient resolution; strong client relationships
• 11–20 cases – Moderate activity; potential for improvement
• 21+ cases – High volume; assess operational processes

Common Pitfalls

Many firms misinterpret the number of cases going to trial as a standalone success metric, overlooking the quality and outcomes of those cases.

• Failing to analyze case outcomes can lead to misguided strategies. A high trial number without favorable results may indicate deeper issues in case preparation or client communication.
• Neglecting to track pre-trial settlements skews the understanding of overall performance. Many cases may be resolved before trial, which can reflect positively on a firm’s negotiation skills but may not be captured in trial counts.
• Overemphasizing trial numbers can lead to burnout among staff. High-pressure environments may compromise the quality of representation and client satisfaction.
• Ignoring client feedback on trial experiences can hinder improvement. Without understanding client perspectives, firms may miss opportunities to enhance service delivery.

Improvement Levers

Enhancing the number of cases going to trial requires a multi-faceted approach focused on strategic alignment and operational improvements.

• Implement case management software to streamline processes and track case progress. Automation reduces administrative burdens, allowing attorneys to focus on substantive legal work and client engagement.
• Develop training programs for attorneys on negotiation and settlement techniques. Improved skills in these areas can lead to more favorable pre-trial resolutions, increasing overall efficiency.
• Encourage a culture of collaboration among legal teams to share insights and strategies. Cross-functional discussions can uncover best practices that enhance trial preparedness and client service.
• Regularly review case outcomes and client feedback to identify areas for improvement. Data-driven analysis can inform adjustments in strategy and enhance overall performance.

Number of Cases Going to Trial Case Study Example

A mid-sized law firm, Legal Solutions, faced challenges with a stagnant number of cases going to trial, averaging just 12 cases annually. This limited their revenue potential and strained client relationships, as clients often sought more aggressive representation. In response, the firm initiated a comprehensive review of its case management processes, identifying bottlenecks in communication and case preparation.

The firm adopted a new case management system that integrated client feedback mechanisms and streamlined workflows. They also invested in training sessions for attorneys focused on trial advocacy and negotiation tactics. This dual approach not only improved internal efficiencies but also enhanced client satisfaction, as clients felt more engaged and informed throughout the process.

Within a year, the number of cases going to trial increased to 25, with a notable improvement in case outcomes. The firm reported a 30% increase in revenue attributed to higher trial activity and improved client retention rates. The success of this initiative positioned Legal Solutions as a more competitive player in the market, allowing them to attract new clients and expand their practice areas.

The firm's leadership recognized that the changes made were not just about increasing trial numbers but also about enhancing overall client experience. By fostering a culture of continuous improvement and responsiveness, they established a framework for sustainable growth and operational excellence.