Number of Discovery Requests
CYBER WEEK PROMOTION: Save 25% this week only (ends 12/7).


Number of Discovery Requests

What is Number of Discovery Requests?
The total count of formal requests for evidence made by the legal team, reflecting the extent of information gathering during a case.

View Benchmarks




The Number of Discovery Requests serves as a critical performance indicator for organizations aiming to enhance operational efficiency and strategic alignment.

This metric reflects the volume of inquiries generated during the initial stages of project development, influencing business outcomes such as project feasibility and resource allocation.

A higher number of requests often indicates a robust interest in innovation and a proactive approach to problem-solving.

Conversely, a low count may signal stagnation or ineffective communication channels.

Tracking this KPI enables organizations to calculate resource needs and forecast project timelines effectively.

Ultimately, it supports data-driven decision-making across departments.

Number of Discovery Requests Interpretation

High values of Discovery Requests suggest a thriving environment for innovation and collaboration, while low values may indicate missed opportunities or ineffective outreach. Ideal targets vary by industry, but organizations should strive for a consistent upward trend in requests.

  • High (above target threshold) – Indicates strong interest and engagement.
  • Moderate (within target threshold) – Suggests stable performance but room for improvement.
  • Low (below target threshold) – Signals potential issues in communication or project initiation.

Number of Discovery Requests Benchmarks

We have 6 relevant benchmark(s) in our benchmarks database.

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent 1978 FJC study cases with at least some discovery 3114 cases

Benchmark data is only available to KPI Depot subscribers. The full benchmark database contains 22,635 benchmarks.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only requests average 1978 FJC study cases with more than 10 discovery requests 152 cases (of 3114 examined)

Benchmark data is only available to KPI Depot subscribers. The full benchmark database contains 22,635 benchmarks.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent cases with any discovery

Benchmark data is only available to KPI Depot subscribers. The full benchmark database contains 22,635 benchmarks.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only requests average cases with two, three, or four or more parties that involved

Benchmark data is only available to KPI Depot subscribers. The full benchmark database contains 22,635 benchmarks.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only requests average vehicle tort, malpractice/product liability and other tort c tort cases

Benchmark data is only available to KPI Depot subscribers. The full benchmark database contains 22,635 benchmarks.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only requests mean change per additional party 1978 FJC study cases with some discovery

Benchmark data is only available to KPI Depot subscribers. The full benchmark database contains 22,635 benchmarks.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Common Pitfalls

Many organizations overlook the importance of tracking Discovery Requests, leading to missed opportunities for innovation.

  • Failing to promote the discovery process can result in low engagement from stakeholders. Without awareness, potential contributors may not feel encouraged to submit requests, stifling creativity and collaboration.
  • Neglecting to analyze the types of requests received can obscure valuable insights. Understanding patterns in inquiries helps identify areas for improvement and resource allocation.
  • Overcomplicating the submission process can deter participation. A cumbersome system may frustrate users, leading to fewer requests and lost ideas.
  • Ignoring feedback from requestors can hinder future engagement. Organizations should actively seek input on the discovery process to refine and enhance it.

KPI Depot is trusted by organizations worldwide, including leading brands such as those listed below.

AAMC Accenture AXA Bristol Myers Squibb Capgemini DBS Bank Dell Delta Emirates Global Aluminum EY GSK GlaskoSmithKline Honeywell IBM Mitre Northrup Grumman Novo Nordisk NTT Data PepsiCo Samsung Suntory TCS Tata Consultancy Services Vodafone

Improvement Levers

Enhancing the Number of Discovery Requests requires a focus on accessibility, communication, and continuous improvement.

  • Streamline the submission process to make it user-friendly. Simplifying forms and providing clear instructions encourages more stakeholders to participate.
  • Implement regular communication campaigns to raise awareness about the discovery process. Highlighting success stories can motivate others to contribute their ideas.
  • Utilize analytics to track trends in requests and identify gaps. Regularly reviewing this data allows organizations to adapt their strategies and focus on areas needing attention.
  • Encourage cross-departmental collaboration to broaden the pool of ideas. Facilitating discussions between teams can uncover unique insights and foster a culture of innovation.

Number of Discovery Requests Case Study Example

A leading technology firm faced stagnation in its innovation pipeline, with a declining number of Discovery Requests over the past year. Recognizing the need for revitalization, the executive team initiated a campaign called “Idea Catalyst,” aimed at reinvigorating employee engagement and encouraging contributions. They simplified the submission process and introduced monthly brainstorming sessions where employees could pitch ideas in a collaborative environment.

Within 6 months, the firm saw a 150% increase in Discovery Requests, leading to several new projects that aligned with strategic goals. The initiative not only improved the volume of requests but also enhanced cross-functional collaboration, as teams began to share insights and build upon each other's ideas. The company also implemented a feedback loop, allowing employees to see the impact of their contributions, which further motivated participation.

As a result, the organization successfully launched 3 new products within a year, significantly boosting its market presence and revenue. The “Idea Catalyst” initiative transformed the culture, fostering an environment where innovation thrived and employees felt empowered to contribute. This case illustrates how focusing on the Number of Discovery Requests can lead to substantial business outcomes and improved financial health.

Related KPIs


What is the standard formula?
Total Number of Discovery Requests Made


You can't improve what you don't measure.

Unlock smarter decisions with instant access to 20,000+ KPIs and 10,000+ benchmarks.

Subscribe to KPI Depot Today

KPI Categories

This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:



KPI Depot (formerly the Flevy KPI Library) is a comprehensive, fully searchable database of over 20,000+ KPIs and 10,000+ benchmarks. Each KPI is documented with 12 practical attributes that take you from definition to real-world application (definition, business insights, measurement approach, formula, trend analysis, diagnostics, tips, visualization ideas, risk warnings, tools & tech, integration points, and change impact).

KPI categories span every major corporate function and more than 150+ industries, giving executives, analysts, and consultants an instant, plug-and-play reference for building scorecards, dashboards, and data-driven strategies.

Our team is constantly expanding our KPI database and benchmarks database.

Got a question? Email us at support@kpidepot.com.

FAQs

What factors influence the Number of Discovery Requests?

Several factors can impact this metric, including organizational culture, communication effectiveness, and the clarity of the submission process. A supportive environment encourages more requests, while unclear guidelines may deter participation.

How often should Discovery Requests be reviewed?

Regular reviews, ideally monthly, help organizations stay attuned to trends and make necessary adjustments. This frequency allows for timely interventions and fosters a culture of continuous improvement.

Can technology improve the tracking of Discovery Requests?

Yes, implementing a dedicated platform for submissions can streamline the process and enhance tracking capabilities. Automation can also provide analytics that reveal patterns and insights, driving better decision-making.

What role does leadership play in encouraging Discovery Requests?

Leadership plays a crucial role in fostering a culture of innovation. By actively promoting the discovery process and recognizing contributions, leaders can motivate employees to engage and share their ideas.

Is there a correlation between Discovery Requests and project success?

Research suggests that a higher volume of Discovery Requests often correlates with increased project success rates. Engaging more stakeholders early in the process leads to better-informed decisions and outcomes.

How can we ensure quality in the requests received?

Providing clear guidelines and criteria for submissions can help maintain quality. Additionally, offering feedback on requests can guide contributors to refine their ideas for better alignment with organizational goals.


Explore KPI Depot by Function & Industry



Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 12 attributes.

KPI Definition

A clear explanation of what the KPI measures

Potential Business Insights

The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI

Measurement Approach

An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI

Standard Formula

The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI

Trend Analysis

Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts

Diagnostic Questions

Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve

Actionable Tips

Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions

Visualization Suggestions

Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making

Risk Warnings

Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention

Tools & Technologies

Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively

Integration Points

How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management

Change Impact

Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected


Compare Our Plans