Number of Summary Judgments Obtained

KPI Categories

This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:

Number of Summary Judgments Obtained Interpretation

High values of Summary Judgments Obtained reflect successful legal outcomes and efficient case management. Conversely, low values may indicate a backlog of unresolved cases or ineffective legal strategies. The ideal target threshold varies by industry but typically aims for a consistent upward trend over time.

0-5 judgments per quarter – Potential underperformance; review case management processes.
6-10 judgments per quarter – Moderate performance; consider enhancing legal strategies.
11+ judgments per quarter – Strong performance; maintain and replicate successful practices.

Common Pitfalls

Many organizations overlook the importance of tracking Summary Judgments, leading to missed opportunities for improvement.

Failing to analyze case outcomes can result in repeated mistakes. Without a thorough review, teams may not learn from past judgments, hindering future performance.
Neglecting to set clear objectives for legal teams can create misalignment. When expectations are unclear, teams may focus on quantity over quality, impacting overall effectiveness.
Overlooking the role of external factors can distort judgment outcomes. Changes in regulations or market conditions can significantly affect case results, making it essential to consider these variables.
Not leveraging technology for tracking and reporting can hinder operational efficiency. Manual processes often lead to errors and delays, complicating data analysis and decision-making.

Improvement Levers

Enhancing the Number of Summary Judgments Obtained requires a strategic focus on process optimization and resource allocation.

Implement a centralized case management system to streamline workflows. This allows for better tracking of cases and enhances collaboration among legal teams.
Regularly train legal staff on best practices and emerging trends. Continuous education ensures teams are equipped with the latest knowledge and skills to handle cases effectively.
Utilize data analytics to identify patterns in case outcomes. Analyzing past judgments can provide insights that inform future strategies and improve forecasting accuracy.
Foster collaboration between legal and business units to align objectives. This ensures that legal strategies support broader business outcomes and enhance overall performance.

Number of Summary Judgments Obtained Case Study Example

A mid-sized technology firm faced challenges in obtaining favorable summary judgments, impacting its cash flow and legal costs. Over a year, the company averaged only 4 judgments per quarter, resulting in increased reliance on external legal counsel and rising expenses. Recognizing the need for improvement, the firm initiated a comprehensive review of its legal processes, focusing on case selection and resource allocation.

The legal team adopted a new strategy that emphasized early case assessment and collaboration with business units. By leveraging data analytics, they identified high-potential cases and prioritized them for litigation. Additionally, the firm invested in training programs to enhance the skills of its in-house legal staff, fostering a culture of continuous improvement.

Within 6 months, the Number of Summary Judgments Obtained increased to an average of 10 per quarter. This improvement not only reduced legal expenses but also enhanced the firm's reputation in the industry. The increased efficiency allowed the legal team to focus on strategic initiatives, contributing to better alignment with overall business goals.

By the end of the fiscal year, the firm reported a 25% reduction in legal costs and improved cash flow, thanks to the higher number of favorable judgments. The success of this initiative positioned the legal department as a key player in driving business outcomes, showcasing the value of effective legal strategies.

Every successful executive knows you can't improve what you don't measure.

With 20,780 KPIs and 11,783 benchmarks, PPT Depot is the most comprehensive KPI database available. We empower you to measure, manage, and optimize every function, process, and team across your organization.

Subscribe to KPI Depot Today

KPI Depot (formerly the Flevy KPI Library) is a comprehensive, fully searchable database of over 20,000+ Key Performance Indicators. Each KPI is documented with 12 practical attributes that take you from definition to real-world application (definition, business insights, measurement approach, formula, trend analysis, diagnostics, tips, visualization ideas, risk warnings, tools & tech, integration points, and change impact).

KPI categories span every major corporate function and more than 100+ industries, giving executives, analysts, and consultants an instant, plug-and-play reference for building scorecards, dashboards, and data-driven strategies. In August 2025, we have also begun to compile an extensive benchmarks database.

Our team is constantly expanding our KPI database and benchmarks database.

Got a question? Email us at support@kpidepot.com.

FAQs

What factors influence the Number of Summary Judgments Obtained?

Case complexity, legal strategy, and resource allocation are key factors. Effective case management and collaboration with business units also play significant roles.

How often should this KPI be monitored?

Monthly monitoring is advisable for most organizations. Frequent reviews allow for timely adjustments to legal strategies and resource allocation.

What is considered a good number of summary judgments?

A good number varies by industry, but consistently achieving 10 or more per quarter is often seen as a positive indicator. Organizations should benchmark against industry standards for context.

Can technology improve this KPI?

Yes, technology can streamline case management and enhance data analysis. Implementing legal tech solutions can lead to improved operational efficiency and better tracking of outcomes.

How can legal teams align with business objectives?

Regular communication and collaboration between legal and business units are essential. Establishing shared goals ensures that legal strategies support overall business outcomes.

What role does training play in improving this KPI?

Training equips legal staff with the necessary skills and knowledge to handle cases effectively. Continuous education fosters a culture of improvement and adaptability.