The Occupant Satisfaction Index (OSI) serves as a critical performance indicator for organizations aiming to enhance workplace environments.
High OSI scores correlate with improved employee retention, increased productivity, and better overall financial health.
By leveraging data-driven decision-making, companies can identify areas for operational efficiency and strategic alignment.
A robust OSI not only reflects current occupant sentiment but also forecasts future engagement trends.
Companies that prioritize occupant satisfaction often see a direct impact on their bottom line, making it a vital metric in management reporting and business intelligence.
High OSI values indicate a positive occupant experience, reflecting effective management practices and a supportive environment. Conversely, low scores may signal underlying issues that require immediate attention, such as inadequate facilities or poor communication. Ideal targets typically hover above a score of 80, suggesting a high level of satisfaction among occupants.
We have 8 relevant benchmarks in our benchmarks database.
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent of survey respondents | threshold | performance period | regular occupants of all primary spaces | buildings pursuing Green Star – Performance certification | Australia |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent of satisfied votes (5–7 on a 7-point scale) | building occupants (84,366 respondents across 897 buildings) | mixed building types | 897 buildings and 84,366 respondents |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | Leesman Index (Lmi) | average | 2015–2016 | employees | multiple industries | multiple countries | 11,366 responses from employees in 40 different ABW environm |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | H-Lmi 0–100 rating and percent of respondents | bands | Data 15.09.2020 | employees | global (over 83 countries) | over 126,000 employees across 873 workplaces |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | Home Leesman Index (H-Lmi) | threshold | 2020 | employees | more than 144,000 responses |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | Home Leesman Index (H-Lmi) | average | 2024 | employees | global | more than a million responses |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | Leesman Index (Lmi) | average | 2024 | employees | global | more than a million responses |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | Leesman Index (Lmi) | average | 2019 | employees | global | more than a million responses |
Many organizations underestimate the importance of regular feedback loops in measuring occupant satisfaction.
Enhancing occupant satisfaction requires a multifaceted approach that prioritizes communication and responsiveness.
A leading global tech firm recognized a decline in its Occupant Satisfaction Index, which had dropped to 68%. This decline was affecting employee morale and productivity, prompting the leadership team to take action. They initiated a comprehensive review of workplace conditions, focusing on feedback from employees regarding workspace functionality and amenities.
The firm established a task force to address the issues identified in the feedback. They implemented a series of changes, including redesigning open spaces to promote collaboration, enhancing break areas, and improving air quality through upgraded HVAC systems. Additionally, they launched a monthly feedback survey to continuously monitor satisfaction levels and address concerns in real-time.
Within 6 months, the OSI improved to 82%, reflecting a significant turnaround in employee sentiment. The firm also noted a 15% increase in productivity metrics, attributed to the enhanced work environment. Employees reported feeling more valued and engaged, which translated into lower turnover rates.
The success of this initiative reinforced the importance of the Occupant Satisfaction Index as a key figure in their KPI framework. The firm now uses OSI as a leading indicator for strategic planning and resource allocation, ensuring that occupant satisfaction remains a priority in their operational strategy.
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.
The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.
When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.
Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.
Got a question? Email us at [email protected].
Several factors contribute to the OSI, including workspace design, amenities, and management responsiveness. Regular feedback from occupants also plays a crucial role in shaping satisfaction levels.
Measuring occupant satisfaction quarterly is advisable for most organizations. This frequency allows for timely adjustments based on feedback while avoiding survey fatigue.
Yes, a high OSI is closely linked to improved employee retention rates. Satisfied occupants are more likely to stay with the organization, reducing turnover costs.
Management plays a pivotal role in fostering a positive environment. Effective communication, responsiveness to feedback, and visible commitment to improvements can significantly enhance satisfaction.
Yes, the OSI can be adapted to measure satisfaction in remote work settings. Factors such as technology access, communication effectiveness, and work-life balance are key considerations.
Organizations can benchmark their OSI against industry standards or peer companies. This comparison helps identify areas for improvement and sets realistic targets for satisfaction.
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected
NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)