On-Hold Time Per Ticket measures the duration customers spend waiting for resolution, impacting both customer satisfaction and operational efficiency.
High on-hold times can lead to frustration, resulting in lost sales and diminished brand loyalty.
Companies that actively manage this KPI often see improved customer retention and reduced churn rates.
By optimizing call handling processes, organizations can enhance their financial health and drive better business outcomes.
Effective management of on-hold time also supports strategic alignment with customer service goals, ultimately improving ROI metrics.
Tracking this KPI allows for data-driven decision-making that fosters continuous improvement across service channels.
High on-hold times indicate inefficiencies in customer support processes, potentially leading to customer dissatisfaction. Conversely, low on-hold times reflect effective resource allocation and quick issue resolution. Ideal targets typically fall below 2 minutes for most industries.
We have 5 relevant benchmarks in our benchmarks database.
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | minutes | threshold | customer calls | cross-industry |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | minutes and seconds | average | customer calls | cross-industry |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | minutes | threshold | calls with a hold period | cross-industry | United Kingdom |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | seconds | threshold | calls with a hold period | call centres | United Kingdom |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | minutes | average | customer calls | cross-industry |
Many organizations overlook the significance of on-hold time, mistakenly believing it to be a minor issue.
Reducing on-hold time requires a focus on process optimization and resource management.
A mid-sized telecommunications provider faced increasing customer complaints about long on-hold times, which had risen to an average of 8 minutes. This negatively impacted customer satisfaction scores and led to a noticeable increase in churn rates. Recognizing the urgency, the company initiated a project called "Hold Time Revolution," aimed at streamlining its customer service processes.
The project included implementing a new call routing system that prioritized calls based on urgency and customer history. Additionally, the company invested in training programs that equipped representatives with tools to resolve issues more efficiently. Within 6 months, on-hold times were reduced to an average of 1.5 minutes, resulting in a 25% decrease in customer complaints related to wait times.
Customer satisfaction scores improved significantly, leading to a 15% increase in retention rates. The financial impact was substantial, with the company estimating an additional $5MM in annual revenue from retained customers. The success of the "Hold Time Revolution" positioned the customer service team as a key driver of business outcomes, rather than a cost center.
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.
The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.
When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.
Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.
Got a question? Email us at [email protected].
A good on-hold time is typically under 2 minutes. This threshold indicates efficient call handling and resource allocation.
Technology such as advanced call routing systems can connect customers to the right representatives faster. This minimizes wait times and enhances overall service quality.
Effective staff training equips representatives with the skills needed to resolve issues quickly. Well-trained staff can significantly reduce on-hold times and improve customer satisfaction.
Yes, offering callback options allows customers to avoid long wait times. This enhances the customer experience and optimizes resource allocation during peak periods.
On-hold time should be monitored regularly, ideally on a weekly basis. Frequent monitoring allows organizations to identify trends and make necessary adjustments promptly.
Long on-hold times can lead to customer frustration and dissatisfaction, negatively impacting loyalty. Customers are more likely to switch providers if they consistently experience long wait times.
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected
NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)