On-stream Factor measures the efficiency of production processes, directly impacting operational efficiency and financial health.
A high On-stream Factor indicates that assets are being utilized effectively, leading to increased output and reduced costs.
Conversely, a low factor may signal equipment downtime or inefficiencies, which can erode profitability.
Organizations that prioritize this KPI often see improvements in their ROI metric and overall business outcomes.
By leveraging data-driven decision-making, companies can align their strategies to enhance performance indicators like the On-stream Factor.
On-stream Factor belongs to one KPI group in KPI Depot, Natural Gas, where it measures the share of available time a plant's units actually run. It sits in the internal process perspective, which makes it a leading operational signal: sustained on-stream time tends to show up before the production and revenue numbers it feeds.
Within the Natural Gas KPI group it is a supporting metric, well down the priority order rather than a headline. The KPI group leads with safety and environmental measures, Health, Safety, and Environment (HSE) Incident Rate at the top, followed by Lost Time Injury Frequency Rate (LTIFR), with emissions metrics such as Leakage Rate and Methane Emissions Intensity ranking ahead of it. On-stream time earns its place as an availability metric that the KPI group's asset-reliability guidance leans on, not as one of its lead indicators.
The tension is with the safety metrics that top the KPI group. Pushing units to stay on stream longer defers the downtime that maintenance and turnarounds need, and deferred maintenance is exactly what raises Process Safety Events and Health, Safety, and Environment (HSE) Incident Rate. Uptime read on its own can look like operational strength while it is quietly borrowing against the safety measures the KPI group ranks first.
The canonical formula is operational time divided by available time, so the honest measurement question is what each side is allowed to include. The data lives in the plant's operations log and the maintenance system, and the two have to agree on the same clock before the ratio means anything.
Decide the definitional forks before measuring. The first is what counts as available time: whether planned turnarounds and major overhauls are carved out of the denominator or left in changes the number materially, and a plant that excludes planned outages reports a very different figure from one that does not. The second is what counts as operational: units running at reduced rate, or running but off-spec, sit in a grey zone, and treating a partial-rate hour as fully on stream flatters the metric. The third is scope. On-stream time for a single processing train is not the same as a whole-plant figure, and rolling several trains into one number can hide a chronically weak unit behind healthier neighbors.
Segmentation that actually helps: split by unit or train, by outage cause (planned turnaround, unplanned trip, external feed or power interruption), and by whether a stoppage was inside the operator's control. An on-stream number that lumps a feedstock shortage together with an equipment failure sends the wrong signal to the reliability team.
The instrumentation pitfalls are specific to how time gets logged. Boundaries between planned and unplanned downtime are often coded after the fact and drift toward whichever category looks better. Short trips and quick restarts can slip below the logging threshold entirely, so a unit that stumbles repeatedly may still post a clean figure. And ramp periods after a restart, when the unit is technically running but not yet making on-spec product, get counted as on stream unless the definition explicitly excludes them.
Many organizations overlook the On-stream Factor, focusing instead on lagging metrics that fail to capture real-time performance.
Enhancing the On-stream Factor requires a proactive approach to operational efficiency and continuous improvement.
On-stream Factor is not named directly in the Natural Gas KPI group's OKR examples, but it connects cleanly to the KPI group's stated practice on asset reliability. That best-practice guidance is to Focus on asset availability metrics such as Pipeline Availability and Plant Utilization Rate for operational continuity, which is exactly the family this metric belongs to.
Read as a key result, on-stream time supports the KPI group's reliability objective around maximizing production while controlling cost: it is the availability signal that sits behind the production-volume and unit-cost key results the OKR material sets. Keep the target directional, an uptime improvement against the plant's own baseline, and pair it with the safety metrics the KPI group ranks first so the reliability push does not quietly trade against them.
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.
The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.
When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.
Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.
Got a question? Email us at [email protected].
A good On-stream Factor typically ranges from 85% to 95%. Values in this range indicate that production processes are running efficiently with minimal downtime.
The On-stream Factor is calculated by dividing the actual production time by the total available production time. This metric provides insight into how effectively production resources are utilized.
Factors such as equipment reliability, workforce efficiency, and production scheduling significantly impact the On-stream Factor. Addressing these areas can lead to substantial improvements.
While related, the On-stream Factor focuses specifically on production time, whereas OEE considers availability, performance, and quality. Both metrics are essential for a comprehensive view of operational efficiency.
Regular reviews, ideally on a monthly basis, are recommended to identify trends and address issues promptly. Frequent monitoring allows for timely interventions to maintain high performance.
While some improvements can be made quickly, sustainable changes often require a long-term strategy. Focusing on training, maintenance, and process optimization yields the best results over time.
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected
NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)