Percentage of Cases Won KPI

What is Percentage of Cases Won?
The percentage of litigation cases that have been won by the organization.

View Benchmarks




Percentage of Cases Won is a critical performance indicator that reflects the effectiveness of a company's sales and legal strategies.

This KPI directly influences revenue growth and customer satisfaction, as it indicates how well an organization converts opportunities into successful outcomes.

A high percentage signifies strong operational efficiency and effective resource allocation, while a low percentage may reveal underlying issues in strategy or execution.

Tracking this metric enables data-driven decision making, aligning teams with strategic goals.

Organizations can leverage insights from this KPI to improve forecasting accuracy and enhance overall financial health.

Percentage of Cases Won Interpretation

High values of Percentage of Cases Won indicate successful case management and effective strategies, while low values may signal inefficiencies or misalignment in approach. Ideal targets typically range from 70% to 90%, depending on industry standards and business objectives.

  • 70%–80% – Healthy performance; indicates effective strategies
  • 60%–69% – Caution advised; review case management processes
  • <60% – Significant concerns; immediate action required

Percentage of Cases Won Benchmarks

We have 16 relevant benchmarks in our benchmarks database.

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent average study period as reported employment discrimination litigation outcomes employment United States 1,430; 160

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent range 1985–1995 (decline described) adjudicated civil cases civil litigation United States federal courts

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent average study period as reported tried employment arbitration cases employment United States 1,659; 310; 174

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent average 2001–2007 employment arbitration awards employment United States 1,213 cases

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent 2002–2003 tort trials tort United States federal courts

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent average 2005 contract trials contract United States

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent average 2005 tort trials tort United States

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent average 2005 general civil trials civil litigation United States

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent average study period as reported employment discrimination litigation outcomes employment United States 1,430; 160

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent range 1985–1995 (decline described) adjudicated civil cases civil litigation United States federal courts

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent average study period as reported tried employment arbitration cases employment United States 1,659; 310; 174

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent average 2001–2007 employment arbitration awards employment United States 1,213 cases

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent 2002–2003 tort trials tort United States federal courts

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent average 2005 contract trials contract United States

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent average 2005 tort trials tort United States

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent average 2005 general civil trials civil litigation United States

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,548 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Common Pitfalls

Many organizations misinterpret the Percentage of Cases Won, leading to misguided strategies and resource allocation.

  • Overlooking case complexity can distort results. A high win rate in simple cases may mask weaknesses in handling more challenging situations, leading to overconfidence.
  • Neglecting to analyze lost cases prevents learning from failures. Without understanding the reasons behind losses, teams may repeat mistakes and fail to improve.
  • Focusing solely on win rates can encourage unethical practices. Pressure to achieve high percentages may lead to cutting corners or misrepresenting case facts.
  • Failing to align teams with strategic objectives can create silos. When departments do not collaborate effectively, the overall win rate may suffer due to lack of shared insights.

KPI Depot is trusted by consulting, strategy, finance, and analytics teams at leading organizations worldwide, including those listed below.

AAMC Accenture AXA Bristol Myers Squibb Capgemini DBS Bank Dell Delta Emirates Global Aluminum EY GSK GlaskoSmithKline Honeywell IBM Mitre Northrup Grumman Novo Nordisk NTT Data PepsiCo Samsung Suntory TCS Tata Consultancy Services Vodafone

Improvement Levers

Enhancing the Percentage of Cases Won requires a strategic focus on both process and people.

  • Implement regular training sessions for teams to improve skills and knowledge. Continuous education ensures that staff are equipped to handle diverse case scenarios effectively.
  • Utilize data analytics to identify patterns in successful cases. Analyzing past cases can reveal winning strategies and inform future approaches.
  • Encourage cross-departmental collaboration to share insights and strategies. When teams work together, they can leverage diverse expertise to improve case outcomes.
  • Establish clear criteria for case evaluation to ensure consistency. A standardized approach helps teams assess cases objectively and align efforts with strategic goals.

Percentage of Cases Won Case Study Example

A leading technology firm faced challenges with its Percentage of Cases Won, which had stagnated at 65%. This figure was concerning, as it hindered revenue growth and customer retention. The company initiated a comprehensive review of its case management processes, identifying gaps in training and resource allocation.

The firm launched a new initiative called "Win More," focusing on enhancing team collaboration and leveraging data analytics. They implemented regular training workshops and established a centralized reporting dashboard to track case outcomes. By analyzing historical data, they identified key factors that contributed to successful cases and shared these insights across teams.

Within 6 months, the Percentage of Cases Won improved to 78%. This increase not only boosted revenue but also enhanced customer satisfaction, as clients experienced more consistent and successful outcomes. The initiative transformed the company's approach to case management, fostering a culture of continuous improvement and strategic alignment.

As a result, the technology firm experienced a significant uptick in referrals and repeat business, further solidifying its market position. The success of "Win More" demonstrated the value of a data-driven approach and the importance of aligning operational strategies with business outcomes.

Related KPIs


What is the standard formula?
(Number of Cases Won / Total Number of Cases Concluded) * 100


Unlock all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks.
Comparable benchmark data services start at $2,400 per year.
See all 16 benchmarks for Percentage of Cases Won
Access to 35,625 benchmarks
Access to 24,181 KPIs
Interactive Strategy Maps on every plan
13 attributes per KPI (view)

Compare Plans

KPI Categories

This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:



KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.

The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.

When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.

Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.

Got a question? Email us at [email protected].

FAQs about Percentage of Cases Won

What is a good Percentage of Cases Won?

A good Percentage of Cases Won typically falls between 70% and 90%, depending on industry standards. Higher percentages indicate effective strategies and operational efficiency.

How can I improve my Percentage of Cases Won?

Improvement can be achieved through regular training, data analysis, and fostering collaboration among teams. Identifying successful strategies from past cases can also enhance future outcomes.

Does this KPI vary by industry?

Yes, different industries have varying benchmarks for Percentage of Cases Won. Understanding industry norms is essential for setting realistic targets.

How often should this KPI be reviewed?

Monthly reviews are recommended to ensure timely adjustments to strategies. Frequent monitoring allows organizations to respond quickly to trends or issues.

Can this KPI impact revenue?

Absolutely. A higher Percentage of Cases Won directly correlates with increased revenue and improved customer satisfaction. Effective case management leads to better financial outcomes.

What tools can help track this KPI?

Utilizing a reporting dashboard can streamline tracking and analysis. Business intelligence tools can provide analytical insights to improve decision-making processes.



Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.

KPI Definition

A clear explanation of what the KPI measures

Potential Business Insights

The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI

Measurement Approach

An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI

Standard Formula

The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI

Trend Analysis

Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts

Diagnostic Questions

Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve

Actionable Tips

Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions

Visualization Suggestions

Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making

Risk Warnings

Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention

Tools & Technologies

Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively

Integration Points

How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management

Change Impact

Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected

BSC Perspective

NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)


Compare Our Plans


Explore KPI Depot by Function & Industry