Percentage of Cases Won is a critical performance indicator that reflects the effectiveness of a company's sales and legal strategies.
This KPI directly influences revenue growth and customer satisfaction, as it indicates how well an organization converts opportunities into successful outcomes.
A high percentage signifies strong operational efficiency and effective resource allocation, while a low percentage may reveal underlying issues in strategy or execution.
Tracking this metric enables data-driven decision making, aligning teams with strategic goals.
Organizations can leverage insights from this KPI to improve forecasting accuracy and enhance overall financial health.
High values of Percentage of Cases Won indicate successful case management and effective strategies, while low values may signal inefficiencies or misalignment in approach. Ideal targets typically range from 70% to 90%, depending on industry standards and business objectives.
We have 16 relevant benchmarks in our benchmarks database.
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | study period as reported | employment discrimination litigation outcomes | employment | United States | 1,430; 160 |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | range | 1985–1995 (decline described) | adjudicated civil cases | civil litigation | United States federal courts |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | study period as reported | tried employment arbitration cases | employment | United States | 1,659; 310; 174 |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | 2001–2007 | employment arbitration awards | employment | United States | 1,213 cases |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | 2002–2003 | tort trials | tort | United States federal courts |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | 2005 | contract trials | contract | United States |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | 2005 | tort trials | tort | United States |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | 2005 | general civil trials | civil litigation | United States |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | study period as reported | employment discrimination litigation outcomes | employment | United States | 1,430; 160 |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | range | 1985–1995 (decline described) | adjudicated civil cases | civil litigation | United States federal courts |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | study period as reported | tried employment arbitration cases | employment | United States | 1,659; 310; 174 |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | 2001–2007 | employment arbitration awards | employment | United States | 1,213 cases |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | 2002–2003 | tort trials | tort | United States federal courts |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | 2005 | contract trials | contract | United States |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | 2005 | tort trials | tort | United States |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | 2005 | general civil trials | civil litigation | United States |
Many organizations misinterpret the Percentage of Cases Won, leading to misguided strategies and resource allocation.
Enhancing the Percentage of Cases Won requires a strategic focus on both process and people.
A leading technology firm faced challenges with its Percentage of Cases Won, which had stagnated at 65%. This figure was concerning, as it hindered revenue growth and customer retention. The company initiated a comprehensive review of its case management processes, identifying gaps in training and resource allocation.
The firm launched a new initiative called "Win More," focusing on enhancing team collaboration and leveraging data analytics. They implemented regular training workshops and established a centralized reporting dashboard to track case outcomes. By analyzing historical data, they identified key factors that contributed to successful cases and shared these insights across teams.
Within 6 months, the Percentage of Cases Won improved to 78%. This increase not only boosted revenue but also enhanced customer satisfaction, as clients experienced more consistent and successful outcomes. The initiative transformed the company's approach to case management, fostering a culture of continuous improvement and strategic alignment.
As a result, the technology firm experienced a significant uptick in referrals and repeat business, further solidifying its market position. The success of "Win More" demonstrated the value of a data-driven approach and the importance of aligning operational strategies with business outcomes.
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.
The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.
When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.
Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.
Got a question? Email us at [email protected].
A good Percentage of Cases Won typically falls between 70% and 90%, depending on industry standards. Higher percentages indicate effective strategies and operational efficiency.
Improvement can be achieved through regular training, data analysis, and fostering collaboration among teams. Identifying successful strategies from past cases can also enhance future outcomes.
Yes, different industries have varying benchmarks for Percentage of Cases Won. Understanding industry norms is essential for setting realistic targets.
Monthly reviews are recommended to ensure timely adjustments to strategies. Frequent monitoring allows organizations to respond quickly to trends or issues.
Absolutely. A higher Percentage of Cases Won directly correlates with increased revenue and improved customer satisfaction. Effective case management leads to better financial outcomes.
Utilizing a reporting dashboard can streamline tracking and analysis. Business intelligence tools can provide analytical insights to improve decision-making processes.
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected
NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)