Percentage of Contracts with Confidentiality Clauses KPI

What is Percentage of Contracts with Confidentiality Clauses?
The proportion of contracts that include confidentiality or non-disclosure provisions.

View Benchmarks




Percentage of Contracts with Confidentiality Clauses is a critical KPI that reflects an organization's commitment to safeguarding sensitive information.

It influences business outcomes such as risk management, compliance adherence, and client trust.

A higher percentage often correlates with enhanced financial health and operational efficiency, as it mitigates potential legal liabilities.

Companies that prioritize confidentiality can also improve their strategic alignment with partners and clients, fostering long-term relationships.

Tracking this metric enables data-driven decision-making and enhances management reporting capabilities, ultimately driving better ROI.

Organizations should aim for a target threshold that aligns with industry standards and best practices.

Percentage of Contracts with Confidentiality Clauses Interpretation

High values indicate a strong emphasis on confidentiality, suggesting robust risk management practices and a proactive approach to client relationships. Conversely, low values may signal a lack of attention to sensitive information, potentially exposing the organization to legal and reputational risks. Ideal targets typically range from 70% to 90% of contracts including confidentiality clauses.

  • 70%–80% – Generally acceptable; indicates awareness of confidentiality
  • 81%–90% – Strong performance; reflects a commitment to protecting sensitive data
  • Above 90% – Excellent; demonstrates industry leadership in confidentiality

Percentage of Contracts with Confidentiality Clauses Benchmarks

We have 11 relevant benchmarks in our benchmarks database.

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent percentage use January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2022 employee settlement agreements public sector Massachusetts, United States 527 settlements (self-reported)

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent percentage use January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2022 employee settlement agreements public sector Massachusetts, United States 624 settlements (self-reported)

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent percentage use January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2022 employee settlement agreements public sector Massachusetts, United States 1 settlement (self-reported)

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent percentage use January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2022 employee settlement agreements public sector Massachusetts, United States 14 settlements (self-reported)

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent percentage use January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2022 employee settlement agreements public sector Massachusetts, United States 37 settlements (self-reported)

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent percentage use January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2022 employee settlement agreements public sector Massachusetts, United States 15 settlements (self-reported)

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent percentage use January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2022 employee settlement agreements public sector Massachusetts, United States 108 settlements (self-reported)

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent percentage use January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2022 employee settlement agreements public sector Massachusetts, United States 7 settlements (self-reported)

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent percentage use January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2022 employee settlement agreements public sector Massachusetts, United States 58 settlements (self-reported)

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent percentage use January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2022 employee settlement agreements public sector Massachusetts, United States 58 settlements (self-reported)

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent percentage use January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2022 employee settlement agreements public sector Massachusetts, United States 1,449 settlements (self-reported)

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Common Pitfalls

Many organizations underestimate the importance of confidentiality clauses, leading to vulnerabilities that can jeopardize client trust and financial stability.

  • Failing to standardize contract templates can result in inconsistent confidentiality provisions. This inconsistency may create gaps in protection, exposing sensitive information to unauthorized access or misuse.
  • Neglecting to review existing contracts regularly can lead to outdated confidentiality clauses. As regulations evolve, outdated provisions may not adequately protect the organization from emerging risks.
  • Overlooking employee training on confidentiality can create compliance gaps. Employees unaware of confidentiality requirements may inadvertently disclose sensitive information, leading to legal repercussions.
  • Ignoring client feedback on confidentiality concerns can damage relationships. Without structured channels for clients to express their concerns, organizations may miss critical insights that could enhance trust.

KPI Depot is trusted by consulting, strategy, finance, and analytics teams at leading organizations worldwide, including those listed below.

AAMC Accenture AXA Bristol Myers Squibb Capgemini DBS Bank Dell Delta Emirates Global Aluminum EY GSK GlaskoSmithKline Honeywell IBM Mitre Northrup Grumman Novo Nordisk NTT Data PepsiCo Samsung Suntory TCS Tata Consultancy Services Vodafone

Improvement Levers

Enhancing the percentage of contracts with confidentiality clauses requires a strategic focus on standardization, training, and communication.

  • Develop standardized contract templates that include robust confidentiality clauses. This ensures consistency and clarity, reducing the risk of gaps in protection across different agreements.
  • Implement regular training sessions for legal and procurement teams on the importance of confidentiality. Educating staff on best practices fosters a culture of compliance and vigilance regarding sensitive information.
  • Establish a feedback loop with clients to address confidentiality concerns proactively. Regular check-ins can uncover potential issues and demonstrate a commitment to safeguarding their information.
  • Conduct periodic audits of existing contracts to identify and update outdated confidentiality provisions. This practice ensures that all agreements remain compliant with current regulations and best practices.

Percentage of Contracts with Confidentiality Clauses Case Study Example

A mid-sized financial services firm faced increasing scrutiny over its data protection practices. With only 60% of its contracts containing confidentiality clauses, the company was at risk of losing clients and facing regulatory penalties. Recognizing the urgency, the firm initiated a project called “Confidentiality First,” led by its Chief Compliance Officer. The project aimed to revise all existing contracts and implement a standardized template that included comprehensive confidentiality provisions.

Within 6 months, the firm successfully updated 90% of its contracts, significantly enhancing its data protection posture. The initiative also included training sessions for employees on the importance of confidentiality, which raised awareness and compliance across the organization. Client feedback mechanisms were established, allowing clients to voice concerns directly to the compliance team, fostering trust and transparency.

As a result of these efforts, the firm not only improved its percentage of contracts with confidentiality clauses to 95%, but it also experienced a 30% increase in client retention rates. The enhanced reputation for data protection attracted new clients, leading to a 15% growth in revenue over the next year. The “Confidentiality First” initiative positioned the firm as a leader in data protection within its industry, demonstrating the tangible value of prioritizing confidentiality in contracts.

Related KPIs


What is the standard formula?
(Number of Contracts with Confidentiality Clauses / Total Number of Contracts) * 100


Unlock all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks.
Comparable benchmark data services start at $2,400 per year.
See all 11 benchmarks for Percentage of Contracts with Confidentiality Clauses
Access to 35,625 benchmarks
Access to 24,181 KPIs
Interactive Strategy Maps on every plan
13 attributes per KPI (view)

Compare Plans

KPI Categories

This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:



KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.

The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.

When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.

Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.

Got a question? Email us at [email protected].

FAQs about Percentage of Contracts with Confidentiality Clauses

Why are confidentiality clauses important?

Confidentiality clauses protect sensitive information from unauthorized disclosure, which is crucial for maintaining client trust and compliance with regulations. They also mitigate potential legal risks and financial liabilities associated with data breaches.

How can I ensure all contracts include confidentiality clauses?

Implementing standardized contract templates is essential for ensuring consistency. Regular training for legal and procurement teams can also help reinforce the importance of including these clauses in all agreements.

What are the risks of not having confidentiality clauses?

Without confidentiality clauses, organizations expose themselves to significant legal and financial risks. Unauthorized disclosures can lead to loss of client trust, regulatory penalties, and damage to the company's reputation.

How often should confidentiality clauses be reviewed?

Regular reviews, ideally annually, are necessary to ensure that confidentiality clauses remain compliant with evolving regulations. This practice also helps identify any outdated provisions that may need updating.

Can confidentiality clauses be negotiated?

Yes, confidentiality clauses can often be negotiated based on the specific needs of both parties. However, it is crucial to ensure that any modifications still provide adequate protection for sensitive information.

What should be included in a confidentiality clause?

A well-drafted confidentiality clause should specify the types of information protected, the obligations of both parties, and the duration of confidentiality. It should also outline any exceptions to the confidentiality obligations.



Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.

KPI Definition

A clear explanation of what the KPI measures

Potential Business Insights

The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI

Measurement Approach

An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI

Standard Formula

The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI

Trend Analysis

Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts

Diagnostic Questions

Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve

Actionable Tips

Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions

Visualization Suggestions

Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making

Risk Warnings

Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention

Tools & Technologies

Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively

Integration Points

How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management

Change Impact

Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected

BSC Perspective

NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)


Compare Our Plans


Explore KPI Depot by Function & Industry