Percentage of Contracts with Force Majeure Clauses is a critical KPI for assessing risk management and operational resilience.
It directly influences financial health, legal exposure, and strategic alignment in contract negotiations.
A higher percentage indicates robust risk mitigation strategies, while a lower percentage may expose the organization to unforeseen disruptions.
Companies with a strong focus on this metric can enhance forecasting accuracy and improve their overall risk profile.
By embedding this KPI into a comprehensive KPI framework, organizations can track results more effectively and make data-driven decisions.
Ultimately, this metric serves as a leading indicator of a company's preparedness for external shocks.
Percentage of Contracts with Force Majeure Clauses Interpretation
High values signify a proactive approach to risk management, indicating that a significant portion of contracts includes protective clauses. Conversely, low values may suggest vulnerability to unforeseen events, potentially leading to financial strain. Ideal targets should aim for at least 80% of contracts to include force majeure clauses.
- 80% and above – Strong risk mitigation; proactive management
- 60%–79% – Moderate coverage; consider revising contracts
- Below 60% – High risk; immediate review needed
Percentage of Contracts with Force Majeure Clauses Benchmarks
We have 3 relevant benchmark(s) in our benchmarks database.
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | prevalence | filed on EDGAR between February 2018 and February 2020 | 130 commercial contracts involving at least one Chinese enti | contracts involving at least one Chinese entity | 130 contracts |
Compare KPI Depot Plans Login
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | prevalence | filed on EDGAR between February 2018 and February 2020 | 46 loan and credit-related agreements involving at least one | contracts involving at least one Chinese entity | 46 agreements |
Compare KPI Depot Plans Login
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | percent of respondents | December 2017 | senior managers with direct responsibilities for Iran busine | companies across a range of industries | organizations headquartered in 18 different countries | 63 executives |
Compare KPI Depot Plans Login
Common Pitfalls
Many organizations underestimate the importance of force majeure clauses, leading to significant exposure during crises.
- Failing to include clear definitions of force majeure can create ambiguity. This may lead to disputes over whether an event qualifies, complicating claims and delaying resolutions.
- Neglecting to review and update contracts regularly can result in outdated terms. As business environments evolve, so should the clauses that protect against unforeseen circumstances.
- Overlooking the need for legal counsel during contract negotiations can lead to poorly drafted clauses. This increases the risk of unenforceable terms that do not adequately protect the organization.
- Relying solely on standard templates without customization may overlook unique business risks. Tailoring clauses to specific operational contexts enhances their effectiveness and relevance.
Improvement Levers
Enhancing the percentage of contracts with force majeure clauses requires a strategic approach to contract management and risk assessment.
- Conduct regular training sessions for legal and procurement teams on the importance of force majeure clauses. This ensures that all stakeholders understand the implications and benefits of including these provisions.
- Implement a standardized review process for all contracts to ensure force majeure clauses are included. This process should involve cross-functional teams to identify potential risks and necessary protections.
- Leverage legal technology tools to streamline contract drafting and review. These tools can help identify missing clauses and suggest best practices based on industry benchmarks.
- Engage in scenario planning to identify potential risks and tailor force majeure clauses accordingly. This proactive approach allows organizations to address specific vulnerabilities in their contracts.
Percentage of Contracts with Force Majeure Clauses Case Study Example
A mid-sized technology firm faced significant disruptions during a global crisis, revealing a lack of adequate force majeure clauses in its contracts. With only 40% of contracts containing these provisions, the company struggled to mitigate financial losses stemming from supply chain interruptions. In response, the executive team prioritized a comprehensive review of all existing contracts, engaging legal experts to draft robust force majeure clauses tailored to their unique business risks.
Within 6 months, the firm increased the percentage of contracts with force majeure clauses to 85%. This improvement not only enhanced their risk management framework but also strengthened relationships with suppliers, as both parties felt more secure in their agreements. The company also implemented a training program for its procurement team, emphasizing the importance of including these clauses in future contracts.
As a result, the firm successfully navigated subsequent disruptions with minimal financial impact. The enhanced contractual protections allowed for smoother negotiations and quicker resolutions during crises. This strategic shift not only improved operational efficiency but also positioned the company as a more reliable partner in the eyes of its stakeholders.
Related KPIs
You can't improve what you don't measure.
Unlock smarter decisions with instant access to 20,000+ KPIs and 10,000+ benchmarks.
KPI Categories
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot (formerly the Flevy KPI Library) is a comprehensive, fully searchable database of over 20,000+ KPIs and 10,000+ benchmarks. Each KPI is documented with 12 practical attributes that take you from definition to real-world application (definition, business insights, measurement approach, formula, trend analysis, diagnostics, tips, visualization ideas, risk warnings, tools & tech, integration points, and change impact).
KPI categories span every major corporate function and more than 150+ industries, giving executives, analysts, and consultants an instant, plug-and-play reference for building scorecards, dashboards, and data-driven strategies.
Our team is constantly expanding our KPI database and benchmarks database.
Got a question? Email us at support@kpidepot.com.
FAQs
What is a force majeure clause?
A force majeure clause is a contract provision that relieves parties from liability or obligation when an extraordinary event occurs. These events typically include natural disasters, wars, or pandemics that prevent contract fulfillment.
Why are force majeure clauses important?
They protect businesses from unforeseen disruptions that could lead to financial losses. Including these clauses in contracts ensures that organizations can navigate crises without facing penalties.
How often should contracts be reviewed for force majeure clauses?
Contracts should be reviewed annually or whenever significant changes occur in the business environment. Regular reviews ensure that force majeure clauses remain relevant and effective.
Can force majeure clauses be negotiated?
Yes, these clauses can be negotiated during contract discussions. Tailoring them to specific risks associated with the business can enhance their effectiveness.
What happens if a force majeure event occurs?
If a force majeure event occurs, the affected party typically must notify the other party and may be excused from performance obligations for the duration of the event. The terms of the clause will dictate the specific procedures to follow.
Are there limitations to force majeure clauses?
Yes, limitations may include specific events that are not covered or requirements for timely notification. Understanding these limitations is crucial for effective risk management.
Explore KPI Depot by Function & Industry
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 12 attributes.
KPI Definition
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
Potential Business Insights
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
Measurement Approach
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
Standard Formula
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Trend Analysis
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Diagnostic Questions
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Actionable Tips
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Visualization Suggestions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Risk Warnings
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Tools & Technologies
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
Integration Points
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Change Impact
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected
