Price Premium measures the additional amount customers are willing to pay for a product or service compared to competitors.
This KPI is crucial for understanding brand positioning and customer loyalty.
A higher price premium often indicates strong brand equity and perceived value, driving revenue growth and market share.
Conversely, a low price premium may signal pricing issues or lack of differentiation.
Companies can leverage this metric to inform pricing strategies and enhance overall financial health.
Effective management of price premium can lead to improved ROI and operational efficiency.
Price Premium sits in KPI Depot's Pricing Strategy KPI group, one of eight headline metrics the group tracks out of forty total pricing KPIs in the database. Ordered by priority, those eight are Price Optimization Success Rate, Price Elasticity of Demand, Customer Lifetime Value (CLV) Impact, Profit Margin Per Unit, Revenue Per Available Unit, Market Share Impact, Price Sensitivity Meter (PSM), and Price Premium itself, which closes out that top tier. It belongs to the small set of metrics the KPI group leads with, but it is the last of those the group asks a pricing team to look at, after profitability and market response have already been checked.
The KPI group places Price Premium in the financial perspective, which is a lagging placement: by the time a price premium can be measured, the pricing decision, the competitive reaction, and the customer's purchase choice have already happened. Earlier metrics in the same KPI group, particularly Price Elasticity of Demand and Price Sensitivity Meter (PSM), exist to predict how a proposed premium will land before it is charged.
The clearest tension sits between Price Premium and Market Share Impact, one of the group's headline metrics. Pushing the premium higher is, almost by construction, a bet that some buyers will walk rather than pay it, so a rising premium and a shrinking share are often the same underlying customer behavior described from two different KPIs. A pricing team that reports gains on both at once should treat that as worth a second look rather than as pure good news, since it usually means the mix of customers being served has narrowed even as revenue per unit rose.
The formula stated for this KPI is a straight subtraction, product price minus average market price, which is a currency gap rather than a percentage. Decide up front whether the team will report and target that raw gap or convert it to a share of market price, because the two move differently as the underlying market price itself rises or falls, and mixing the two forms across products or over time will make trend lines meaningless.
The bigger definitional fork is what counts as the market price on the other side of the equation. Using published list prices ignores the discounts, rebates, and promotions that determine what customers actually pay, while using a syndicated panel's realized price captures the market more honestly but usually lags by weeks. A premium computed against list price and a premium computed against street price for the same product on the same day will not match, and a team that switches sources mid year will see a jump in the metric that has nothing to do with its own pricing decisions.
Segment before averaging. A blended premium across the full catalog hides the fact that flagship products typically carry a real premium while long tail or clearance items often sit at a discount, so a single company wide number tends to understate the strength of the core line and overstate weakness elsewhere. Channel matters too: a premium measured in a direct to consumer channel, where the company controls the shelf, will diverge from the same product's premium in a marketplace or retail channel where competitors are one click away.
The most common instrumentation trap is comparing prices for products that are not actually equivalent. A market price average built from a basket of competitor products that differ in size, formulation, bundled service, or quality tier will produce a premium number that partly reflects those differences rather than pure willingness to pay. Before trusting the output, confirm the competitor basket is matched on the attributes customers actually compare, not just the same product category label.
Many organizations misinterpret Price Premium as merely a reflection of pricing strategy, overlooking its connection to brand perception and customer loyalty.
Enhancing Price Premium requires a multifaceted approach that focuses on value creation and customer engagement.
We have 3 relevant benchmarks in our benchmarks database.
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | 2024 | consumers | consumer goods | 31 countries and territories | 20,000+ consumers |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average premium | mixed | 2021 | sustainability-marketed CPG products | consumer packaged goods | United States | 36 CPG categories |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average premium | mixed | 2022 | sustainability-marketed CPG products | consumer packaged goods | United States | 36 CPG categories |
Browse the Top Benchmarked KPIs in Pricing Strategy
Three tracked sources currently inform this page, and they measure quite different things under the same phrase. PwC's Voice of Consumer survey asks consumers directly what they say they would be willing to pay more for sustainably produced goods, a stated preference figure gathered across a broad set of countries and a large consumer sample. NYU Stern's Center for Sustainable Business, working from retail scanner data across dozens of consumer packaged goods categories in the United States, instead measures a revealed price premium: the actual shelf price gap between products marketed as sustainable and their conventionally marketed counterparts in the same category, based on what shoppers actually paid rather than what they said they would pay.
That distinction matters more than it looks. A stated willingness to pay survey captures intention and can run well ahead of behavior, since it costs a respondent nothing to tell an interviewer they would pay more for a value they hold. A revealed premium from point of sale data captures what buyers actually did, but it bundles in everything else that differs between a sustainably marketed product and its conventional shelf neighbor, including brand strength, packaging, and distribution, not sustainability positioning alone. Two figures that both get called a price premium for sustainability can disagree sharply because one is asking people what they intend and the other is inferring intent from a market outcome with other causes mixed in.
The two NYU Stern data points on this page also cover different years of the same underlying study, which is its own lesson: a premium measured from retail data moves with category dynamics, private label competition, and input costs from one year to the next, so a single reading is a snapshot, not a constant. Before citing any external price premium figure, confirm whether it comes from a stated preference survey or a revealed transaction gap, what category or geography it was measured in, and what period it reflects. Those checks explain more of the disagreement between published figures than any actual change in customer behavior does.
The Pricing Strategy KPI group's objective to maximize profitable revenue growth through strategic price positioning currently tracks Profit Margin Per Unit, Revenue Per Available Unit, Contribution Margin After Pricing, and Customer Lifetime Value (CLV) Impact as its key results. Price Premium belongs in that same objective as a leading check on strategic positioning itself: the other key results confirm that a pricing decision paid off financially, but none of them tells a team whether the market still sees the product as worth more than the alternative. A team could add a key result to grow price premium by a modest amount on its flagship lines over a defined period, while watching Market Share Impact for signs the premium has moved past what the market will bear.
The group's agility objective offers a second angle: it already tracks a Competitive Price Index, which compares the company's pricing position to competitors directly. Price Premium is the same comparison expressed in absolute rather than indexed terms, so a team running both objectives together can use Price Premium to sanity check that gains in the competitive index reflect real pricing power on flagship products rather than a shift in which competitors are included in the comparison set.
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.
The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.
When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.
Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.
Got a question? Email us at [email protected].
Price Premium is the additional amount customers are willing to pay for a product compared to competitors. It reflects brand value and customer loyalty.
Price Premium is calculated by comparing the price of a product to the average price of similar products in the market. The formula is: (Your Price - Competitor Price) / Competitor Price * 100.
Price Premium is crucial for understanding brand positioning and customer perceptions. It influences revenue growth and overall financial health.
Improving Price Premium involves enhancing product value, effective marketing, and engaging with customers. Focus on differentiation and storytelling to justify higher prices.
Luxury goods, technology, and specialty foods often command high Price Premiums. These industries emphasize quality, exclusivity, and brand loyalty.
Regular reviews are essential, ideally quarterly. Market conditions and consumer preferences can change rapidly, impacting pricing strategies.
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected
NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)