Quality Non-compliance Events KPI

What is Quality Non-compliance Events?
The number of times the organization fails to comply with internal or external quality standards.

View Benchmarks




Quality Non-compliance Events serve as a crucial performance indicator, reflecting the effectiveness of quality management systems.

High rates of non-compliance can lead to increased costs, operational inefficiencies, and reputational damage.

By tracking this KPI, organizations can identify areas for improvement, enhance operational efficiency, and align with strategic objectives.

Reducing non-compliance events contributes to better financial health and improved customer satisfaction.

Ultimately, this metric supports data-driven decision-making and fosters a culture of continuous improvement.

Quality Non-compliance Events Interpretation

High values of Quality Non-compliance Events indicate significant issues in quality control processes, leading to potential financial losses and customer dissatisfaction. Conversely, low values suggest effective quality management and adherence to standards. Ideal targets should aim for a consistent reduction in non-compliance events over time.

  • 0–5 events – Excellent quality control; maintain current practices.
  • 6–10 events – Acceptable; consider targeted improvements.
  • 11+ events – Immediate action required; reassess quality processes.

Quality Non-compliance Events Benchmarks

We have 10 relevant benchmarks in our benchmarks database.

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent proportion protocols that had received final protocol approval between patients enrolled in each clinical trial pharmaceutical companies and contract research organizations Combined phase II/III protocols (n = 139)

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent proportion protocols that had received final protocol approval between patients enrolled in each clinical trial pharmaceutical companies and contract research organizations Combined phase II/III protocols (n = 139)

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent proportion protocols that had received final protocol approval between patients enrolled in each clinical trial pharmaceutical companies and contract research organizations Protocols (n = 187)

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent proportion protocols that had received final protocol approval between patients enrolled in each clinical trial pharmaceutical companies and contract research organizations Protocols (n = 187)

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent proportion protocols that had received final protocol approval between patients enrolled in each clinical trial pharmaceutical companies and contract research organizations Protocols (n = 187)

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only protocol deviations per protocol mean protocols that had received final protocol approval between combined phase II/III clinical trial protocols pharmaceutical companies and contract research organizations Combined phase II/III protocols (n = 139)

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only protocol deviations per protocol mean protocols that had received final protocol approval between combined phase II/III clinical trial protocols pharmaceutical companies and contract research organizations Combined phase II/III protocols (n = 139)

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only deviations per protocol mean protocols that had received final protocol approval between clinical trial protocols pharmaceutical companies and contract research organizations Protocols (n = 187)

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only deviations per protocol mean protocols that had received final protocol approval between clinical trial protocols pharmaceutical companies and contract research organizations Protocols (n = 187)

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only deviations per protocol mean protocols that had received final protocol approval between clinical trial protocols pharmaceutical companies and contract research organizations Protocols (n = 187)

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Common Pitfalls

Many organizations overlook the root causes of Quality Non-compliance Events, leading to recurring issues that erode operational efficiency.

  • Failing to conduct regular audits can allow non-compliance issues to fester unnoticed. Without systematic reviews, organizations miss opportunities for early intervention and corrective actions.
  • Inadequate training for staff on quality standards often results in inconsistent application of processes. Employees may not fully understand their roles in maintaining compliance, leading to errors and oversights.
  • Neglecting to document non-compliance events prevents organizations from learning from past mistakes. Without a clear record, teams struggle to identify patterns and implement effective solutions.
  • Overcomplicating compliance procedures can confuse employees and hinder adherence. Simplifying processes and providing clear guidelines can enhance understanding and execution.

KPI Depot is trusted by consulting, strategy, finance, and analytics teams at leading organizations worldwide, including those listed below.

AAMC Accenture AXA Bristol Myers Squibb Capgemini DBS Bank Dell Delta Emirates Global Aluminum EY GSK GlaskoSmithKline Honeywell IBM Mitre Northrup Grumman Novo Nordisk NTT Data PepsiCo Samsung Suntory TCS Tata Consultancy Services Vodafone

Improvement Levers

Identifying and addressing the factors contributing to Quality Non-compliance Events is essential for fostering a culture of quality and accountability.

  • Implement regular training sessions to ensure all employees understand quality standards. Continuous education reinforces the importance of compliance and equips staff with the necessary skills.
  • Utilize a centralized reporting system for tracking non-compliance events. This approach enables teams to analyze data trends and implement corrective measures more effectively.
  • Encourage a culture of open communication where employees can report compliance issues without fear. Fostering transparency helps identify problems early and promotes collective problem-solving.
  • Conduct root cause analysis for each non-compliance event to identify underlying issues. Understanding the "why" behind each event allows organizations to implement targeted solutions.

Quality Non-compliance Events Case Study Example

A mid-sized manufacturing company faced rising Quality Non-compliance Events, which had increased to 15 per quarter. This situation resulted in costly rework, customer complaints, and a decline in market reputation. The leadership team recognized the need for a strategic overhaul and initiated a comprehensive quality improvement program. They established cross-functional teams to analyze non-compliance data and identify root causes.

The initiative focused on enhancing employee training, simplifying compliance procedures, and implementing a robust reporting system. Within 6 months, the company reduced non-compliance events to 6 per quarter, significantly decreasing rework costs and improving customer satisfaction ratings. The leadership team also instituted regular quality audits to ensure ongoing adherence to standards.

As a result of these efforts, the company not only improved its operational efficiency but also regained customer trust. The positive shift in quality perception led to increased sales and a stronger market position. This case illustrates how a proactive approach to managing Quality Non-compliance Events can yield substantial benefits for both the organization and its customers.

Related KPIs


What is the standard formula?
Total Number of Non-compliance Events


Unlock all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks.
Comparable benchmark data services start at $2,400 per year.
See all 10 benchmarks for Quality Non-compliance Events
Access to 35,625 benchmarks
Access to 24,181 KPIs
Interactive Strategy Maps on every plan
13 attributes per KPI (view)

Compare Plans

KPI Categories

This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:



KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.

The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.

When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.

Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.

Got a question? Email us at [email protected].

FAQs about Quality Non-compliance Events

What are Quality Non-compliance Events?

Quality Non-compliance Events refer to instances where products or processes fail to meet established quality standards. Tracking these events helps organizations identify weaknesses in their quality management systems.

How can we reduce Quality Non-compliance Events?

Implementing regular training and fostering a culture of open communication can significantly reduce non-compliance events. Additionally, conducting root cause analysis for each event helps address underlying issues effectively.

Why is it important to track Quality Non-compliance Events?

Tracking these events provides valuable insights into operational efficiency and quality management effectiveness. It also helps organizations align with strategic objectives and improve overall financial health.

What role does employee training play in compliance?

Employee training is crucial for ensuring that staff understand and adhere to quality standards. Regular training reinforces the importance of compliance and equips employees with the necessary skills to maintain quality.

How often should we review our quality management processes?

Regular reviews, ideally quarterly, help organizations stay proactive in identifying and addressing potential non-compliance issues. Frequent assessments ensure that quality management processes remain effective and relevant.

Can technology help in managing Quality Non-compliance Events?

Yes, technology can streamline reporting and tracking of non-compliance events. Implementing a centralized system allows for better data analysis and more effective corrective actions.



Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.

KPI Definition

A clear explanation of what the KPI measures

Potential Business Insights

The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI

Measurement Approach

An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI

Standard Formula

The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI

Trend Analysis

Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts

Diagnostic Questions

Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve

Actionable Tips

Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions

Visualization Suggestions

Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making

Risk Warnings

Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention

Tools & Technologies

Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively

Integration Points

How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management

Change Impact

Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected

BSC Perspective

NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)


Compare Our Plans


Explore KPI Depot by Function & Industry