Regulatory Submission Quality Score
CYBER WEEK PROMOTION: Save 25% this week only (ends 12/7).


Regulatory Submission Quality Score

What is Regulatory Submission Quality Score?
A score assessing the quality of submissions to regulatory bodies, including the accuracy and completeness of information provided.

View Benchmarks




Regulatory Submission Quality Score is critical for ensuring compliance and operational efficiency in regulated industries.

High scores indicate effective submission processes, leading to faster approvals and reduced time to market for new products.

This KPI influences financial health by minimizing costly delays and enhancing strategic alignment across teams.

Organizations that prioritize submission quality can achieve better forecasting accuracy and improved ROI metrics.

By tracking this leading indicator, executives can make data-driven decisions that directly impact business outcomes.

Regulatory Submission Quality Score Interpretation

High scores reflect a robust submission process, while low scores may indicate inefficiencies or compliance risks. An ideal target threshold is typically above 85%, signaling strong operational performance.

  • >90% – Excellent; indicates best-in-class submission practices
  • 80–89% – Good; room for improvement exists
  • <80% – Poor; requires immediate attention and corrective actions

Regulatory Submission Quality Score Benchmarks

We have 5 relevant benchmark(s) in our benchmarks database.

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent failure rate CY2018; Q1 2019 NDA, ANDA, BLA, and Commercial IND submissions with study da pharmaceuticals United States All types combined: 2,895 submissions with study data (2018)

Benchmark data is only available to KPI Depot subscribers. The full benchmark database contains 22,588 benchmarks.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent failure rate CY2018; Q1 2019 NDA, ANDA, BLA, and Commercial IND submissions assessed for pharmaceuticals United States Total submissions: 194,287 (2018) and 51,010 (Q1 2019) acros

Benchmark data is only available to KPI Depot subscribers. The full benchmark database contains 22,588 benchmarks.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent rate initial Marketing Authorisation Applications pharmaceuticals European Union

Benchmark data is only available to KPI Depot subscribers. The full benchmark database contains 22,588 benchmarks.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent rate clinical trial applications pharmaceuticals United Kingdom

Benchmark data is only available to KPI Depot subscribers. The full benchmark database contains 22,588 benchmarks.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent rate new drug applications and efficacy supplements pharmaceuticals United States 2,475 applications

Benchmark data is only available to KPI Depot subscribers. The full benchmark database contains 22,588 benchmarks.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Common Pitfalls

Many organizations underestimate the importance of submission quality, leading to costly delays and compliance issues.

  • Relying on outdated templates can result in errors and omissions. This not only delays approvals but also increases the risk of regulatory scrutiny, which can harm reputation.
  • Inadequate training for staff on submission requirements often leads to inconsistent quality. Without proper knowledge, teams may overlook critical elements that affect approval timelines.
  • Neglecting to incorporate feedback from previous submissions can perpetuate the same mistakes. Continuous improvement is essential for enhancing submission quality and avoiding repeated failures.
  • Overcomplicating submission documents can confuse reviewers and lead to rejections. Clear, concise information is crucial for ensuring that submissions are understood and processed efficiently.

KPI Depot is trusted by organizations worldwide, including leading brands such as those listed below.

AAMC Accenture AXA Bristol Myers Squibb Capgemini DBS Bank Dell Delta Emirates Global Aluminum EY GSK GlaskoSmithKline Honeywell IBM Mitre Northrup Grumman Novo Nordisk NTT Data PepsiCo Samsung Suntory TCS Tata Consultancy Services Vodafone

Improvement Levers

Enhancing submission quality requires a proactive approach to streamline processes and empower teams.

  • Implement standardized submission checklists to ensure all requirements are met. This reduces the likelihood of missing critical information and improves overall submission quality.
  • Invest in training programs focused on regulatory requirements and best practices. Well-informed teams are better equipped to produce high-quality submissions that meet or exceed expectations.
  • Utilize analytics tools to track submission performance and identify trends. Data-driven insights can pinpoint areas for improvement and help teams focus their efforts effectively.
  • Encourage cross-functional collaboration to gather diverse perspectives on submission quality. Engaging multiple stakeholders can lead to more comprehensive and effective submissions.

Regulatory Submission Quality Score Case Study Example

A leading biotech firm faced challenges with its Regulatory Submission Quality Score, which hovered around 75%. This low score resulted in delayed product launches and increased costs associated with resubmissions. The executive team recognized the need for a strategic overhaul and initiated a comprehensive review of their submission processes. They established a cross-departmental task force to identify bottlenecks and implement best practices.

The task force introduced a new submission management system that streamlined document preparation and tracking. They also developed a series of training workshops to enhance staff understanding of regulatory requirements. Over the next year, the firm saw its score rise to 88%, significantly reducing time to market for new therapies.

As a result, the company not only improved its compliance standing but also enhanced its reputation with regulatory bodies. Faster approvals allowed the firm to allocate resources more effectively, driving innovation and growth. The success of this initiative reinforced the importance of submission quality in achieving strategic business objectives.

Related KPIs


What is the standard formula?
Quality Score of Regulatory Submissions


You can't improve what you don't measure.

Unlock smarter decisions with instant access to 20,000+ KPIs and 10,000+ benchmarks.

Subscribe to KPI Depot Today

KPI Categories

This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:



KPI Depot (formerly the Flevy KPI Library) is a comprehensive, fully searchable database of over 20,000+ KPIs and 10,000+ benchmarks. Each KPI is documented with 12 practical attributes that take you from definition to real-world application (definition, business insights, measurement approach, formula, trend analysis, diagnostics, tips, visualization ideas, risk warnings, tools & tech, integration points, and change impact).

KPI categories span every major corporate function and more than 150+ industries, giving executives, analysts, and consultants an instant, plug-and-play reference for building scorecards, dashboards, and data-driven strategies.

Our team is constantly expanding our KPI database and benchmarks database.

Got a question? Email us at support@kpidepot.com.

FAQs

What factors influence the Regulatory Submission Quality Score?

Key factors include the completeness of documentation, adherence to regulatory guidelines, and the efficiency of internal review processes. Each element plays a crucial role in determining the overall quality of submissions.

How can technology improve submission quality?

Technology can automate data collection and streamline document preparation, reducing human error. Advanced analytics can also provide insights into submission performance, enabling teams to make informed adjustments.

What role does team training play in submission quality?

Training ensures that all team members are aware of regulatory requirements and best practices. A well-trained team is less likely to make errors that could jeopardize submission quality.

How often should the Regulatory Submission Quality Score be reviewed?

Regular reviews, ideally quarterly, help organizations stay on top of submission quality trends. Frequent assessments allow for timely adjustments and continuous improvement.

Can external audits help improve submission quality?

Yes, external audits provide an unbiased assessment of submission processes. They can identify gaps and recommend improvements that internal teams may overlook.

What is the impact of submission quality on market access?

High submission quality can expedite regulatory approvals, leading to faster market access. This is crucial for maintaining competitive positioning and maximizing revenue potential.


Explore KPI Depot by Function & Industry



Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 12 attributes.

KPI Definition

A clear explanation of what the KPI measures

Potential Business Insights

The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI

Measurement Approach

An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI

Standard Formula

The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI

Trend Analysis

Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts

Diagnostic Questions

Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve

Actionable Tips

Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions

Visualization Suggestions

Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making

Risk Warnings

Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention

Tools & Technologies

Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively

Integration Points

How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management

Change Impact

Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected


Compare Our Plans