Regulatory Submission Quality Score is critical for ensuring compliance and operational efficiency in regulated industries.
High scores indicate effective submission processes, leading to faster approvals and reduced time to market for new products.
This KPI influences financial health by minimizing costly delays and enhancing strategic alignment across teams.
Organizations that prioritize submission quality can achieve better forecasting accuracy and improved ROI metrics.
By tracking this leading indicator, executives can make data-driven decisions that directly impact business outcomes.
High scores reflect a robust submission process, while low scores may indicate inefficiencies or compliance risks. An ideal target threshold is typically above 85%, signaling strong operational performance.
We have 5 relevant benchmark(s) in our benchmarks database.
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | failure rate | CY2018; Q1 2019 | NDA, ANDA, BLA, and Commercial IND submissions with study da | pharmaceuticals | United States | All types combined: 2,895 submissions with study data (2018) |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | failure rate | CY2018; Q1 2019 | NDA, ANDA, BLA, and Commercial IND submissions assessed for | pharmaceuticals | United States | Total submissions: 194,287 (2018) and 51,010 (Q1 2019) acros |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | rate | initial Marketing Authorisation Applications | pharmaceuticals | European Union |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | rate | clinical trial applications | pharmaceuticals | United Kingdom |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | rate | new drug applications and efficacy supplements | pharmaceuticals | United States | 2,475 applications |
Many organizations underestimate the importance of submission quality, leading to costly delays and compliance issues.
Enhancing submission quality requires a proactive approach to streamline processes and empower teams.
A leading biotech firm faced challenges with its Regulatory Submission Quality Score, which hovered around 75%. This low score resulted in delayed product launches and increased costs associated with resubmissions. The executive team recognized the need for a strategic overhaul and initiated a comprehensive review of their submission processes. They established a cross-departmental task force to identify bottlenecks and implement best practices.
The task force introduced a new submission management system that streamlined document preparation and tracking. They also developed a series of training workshops to enhance staff understanding of regulatory requirements. Over the next year, the firm saw its score rise to 88%, significantly reducing time to market for new therapies.
As a result, the company not only improved its compliance standing but also enhanced its reputation with regulatory bodies. Faster approvals allowed the firm to allocate resources more effectively, driving innovation and growth. The success of this initiative reinforced the importance of submission quality in achieving strategic business objectives.
You can't improve what you don't measure.
Unlock smarter decisions with instant access to 20,000+ KPIs and 10,000+ benchmarks.
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot (formerly the Flevy KPI Library) is a comprehensive, fully searchable database of over 20,000+ KPIs and 10,000+ benchmarks. Each KPI is documented with 12 practical attributes that take you from definition to real-world application (definition, business insights, measurement approach, formula, trend analysis, diagnostics, tips, visualization ideas, risk warnings, tools & tech, integration points, and change impact).
KPI categories span every major corporate function and more than 150+ industries, giving executives, analysts, and consultants an instant, plug-and-play reference for building scorecards, dashboards, and data-driven strategies.
Our team is constantly expanding our KPI database and benchmarks database.
Got a question? Email us at support@kpidepot.com.
What factors influence the Regulatory Submission Quality Score?
Key factors include the completeness of documentation, adherence to regulatory guidelines, and the efficiency of internal review processes. Each element plays a crucial role in determining the overall quality of submissions.
How can technology improve submission quality?
Technology can automate data collection and streamline document preparation, reducing human error. Advanced analytics can also provide insights into submission performance, enabling teams to make informed adjustments.
What role does team training play in submission quality?
Training ensures that all team members are aware of regulatory requirements and best practices. A well-trained team is less likely to make errors that could jeopardize submission quality.
How often should the Regulatory Submission Quality Score be reviewed?
Regular reviews, ideally quarterly, help organizations stay on top of submission quality trends. Frequent assessments allow for timely adjustments and continuous improvement.
Can external audits help improve submission quality?
Yes, external audits provide an unbiased assessment of submission processes. They can identify gaps and recommend improvements that internal teams may overlook.
What is the impact of submission quality on market access?
High submission quality can expedite regulatory approvals, leading to faster market access. This is crucial for maintaining competitive positioning and maximizing revenue potential.
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 12 attributes.
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected