Settlement to Claim Ratio is a vital performance indicator that reflects the effectiveness of claims management and settlement processes.
A high ratio indicates operational efficiency, suggesting that claims are being settled promptly and accurately, which enhances financial health.
Conversely, a low ratio may highlight inefficiencies, leading to increased costs and delayed revenue recognition.
This KPI influences cash flow, customer satisfaction, and overall profitability.
Organizations that actively track this metric can better align their strategies with business outcomes, ultimately improving ROI and forecasting accuracy.
A high Settlement to Claim Ratio signifies effective claims processing and customer satisfaction, while a low ratio may indicate operational bottlenecks or disputes. Ideal targets typically vary by industry, but organizations should aim for a ratio that reflects their strategic goals.
We have 11 relevant benchmark(s) in our benchmarks database.
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | standard | claims | life insurance | global |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | range | 2020-21 | life insurance claims | life insurance | India |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | annual ratios | 2020-2021 | life insurance claims | life insurance | Bangladesh |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | industry-wide | last two years | outstanding health insurance claims | health insurance | India |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | public sector insurers | last two years | health insurance claims | health insurance | India |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | standalone health insurers | last two years | health insurance claims | health insurance | India |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | ratio | industry-wide | fourth quarter, 2024 | total insurance claims reported | insurance | Nigeria |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | ratio | life insurance sector | fourth quarter, 2024 | total reported life insurance claims | life insurance | Nigeria |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | ratio | non-life insurance segment | fourth quarter, 2024 | total reported non-life insurance claims | non-life insurance | Nigeria |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | threshold | insurance claims | insurance | India |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | time-to-settlement distribution | general insurers | FY 2023-24 | total insurance claims | general insurance | India |
Many organizations overlook the nuances in claims processing that can distort the Settlement to Claim Ratio.
Enhancing the Settlement to Claim Ratio requires a focused approach to streamline processes and improve customer interactions.
A leading insurance provider faced challenges with its Settlement to Claim Ratio, which had dipped to 55%. This decline was impacting customer satisfaction and increasing operational costs. The company initiated a project called "Claims Excellence," aimed at revamping its claims processing framework.
The initiative involved deploying advanced analytics to identify bottlenecks in the claims workflow and implementing a new digital claims platform. This platform streamlined submissions and provided real-time updates to customers, enhancing transparency and trust. Additionally, staff received training on customer engagement, focusing on resolving issues promptly.
Within 6 months, the Settlement to Claim Ratio improved to 75%, significantly reducing processing times and increasing customer satisfaction scores. The company also saw a decrease in operational costs associated with claims handling. The success of "Claims Excellence" positioned the organization as a leader in customer service within the insurance sector, driving further growth and profitability.
You can't improve what you don't measure.
Unlock smarter decisions with instant access to 20,000+ KPIs and 10,000+ benchmarks.
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot (formerly the Flevy KPI Library) is a comprehensive, fully searchable database of over 20,000+ KPIs and 10,000+ benchmarks. Each KPI is documented with 12 practical attributes that take you from definition to real-world application (definition, business insights, measurement approach, formula, trend analysis, diagnostics, tips, visualization ideas, risk warnings, tools & tech, integration points, and change impact).
KPI categories span every major corporate function and more than 150+ industries, giving executives, analysts, and consultants an instant, plug-and-play reference for building scorecards, dashboards, and data-driven strategies.
Our team is constantly expanding our KPI database and benchmarks database.
Got a question? Email us at support@kpidepot.com.
What is a good Settlement to Claim Ratio?
A good Settlement to Claim Ratio typically exceeds 80%. This indicates that claims are being settled efficiently and effectively, contributing positively to overall business outcomes.
How can this KPI impact cash flow?
An improved Settlement to Claim Ratio can enhance cash flow by accelerating the settlement process. Faster resolutions mean quicker revenue recognition, which is crucial for maintaining liquidity.
What role does technology play in improving this metric?
Technology can streamline claims processing and provide real-time insights into performance. Automation and analytics tools help identify inefficiencies and enhance operational efficiency.
How often should the Settlement to Claim Ratio be reviewed?
Regular reviews, ideally on a monthly basis, are recommended to track trends and identify areas for improvement. Frequent monitoring allows organizations to make timely adjustments to their claims processes.
Can customer feedback influence this KPI?
Yes, customer feedback is critical for understanding pain points in the claims process. Addressing these issues can lead to improved settlements and a better overall ratio.
Is this KPI relevant across all industries?
While the Settlement to Claim Ratio is particularly relevant in insurance and finance, it can also apply to other sectors that manage claims or disputes. Each industry may have different benchmarks and targets.
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 12 attributes.
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected