The SG&A to Revenue Ratio serves as a critical performance indicator, reflecting the efficiency of a company's operational spending relative to its revenue generation.
A high ratio may indicate excessive overhead costs, hindering profitability and operational efficiency.
Conversely, a low ratio often signifies effective cost control metrics, enabling better resource allocation and improved financial health.
This KPI directly influences business outcomes like profitability, cash flow management, and strategic alignment with growth objectives.
Organizations leveraging this metric can enhance their forecasting accuracy and drive data-driven decision-making.
Ultimately, it serves as a leading indicator of a company's operational effectiveness and financial sustainability.
A high SG&A to Revenue Ratio suggests that a company is spending too much on selling, general, and administrative expenses relative to its revenue, which can erode profit margins. Low values indicate efficient cost management and operational effectiveness, often leading to improved ROI metrics. Target thresholds typically vary by industry, but maintaining a ratio below 20% is generally considered optimal.
We have 17 relevant benchmark(s) in our benchmarks database.
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | percent | percentiles | publicly traded companies | all sectors combined |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | percent | percentiles | publicly traded companies | manufacturing |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | percent | percentiles | publicly traded companies | services |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | percent | average | January 2025 | US publicly traded firms | Apparel | US | 37 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | percent | average | January 2025 | US publicly traded firms | Retail (General) | US | 24 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | percent | average | January 2025 | US publicly traded firms | Software (System & Application) | US | 333 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | percent | average | January 2025 | US publicly traded firms | Telecom. Services | US | 32 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | percent | average | January 2025 | US publicly traded firms | Semiconductor | US | 63 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | percent | average | January 2025 | US publicly traded firms | Drugs (Pharmaceutical) | US | 231 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | percent | average | January 2025 | US publicly traded firms | Business & Consumer Services | US | 152 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | percent | average | January 2025 | US publicly traded firms | Food Processing | US | 77 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | percent | average | January 2025 | US publicly traded firms | Electronics (General) | US | 122 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | percent | average | January 2025 | US publicly traded firms | Education | US | 29 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | percent | average | January 2025 | US publicly traded firms | Retail (Grocery and Food) | US | 17 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | percent | average | January 2025 | US publicly traded firms | Computers/Peripherals | US | 35 firms |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | percent | average | 2023 fiscal year | construction companies | construction | U.S. and Canada | 1,290 companies |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
Subscribers only | percent | best in class | 2023 fiscal year | construction companies | construction | U.S. and Canada | 1,290 companies |
Many organizations overlook the importance of regularly reviewing their SG&A to Revenue Ratio, leading to inflated costs that compromise financial health.
Enhancing the SG&A to Revenue Ratio requires a focused approach on both cost management and revenue generation strategies.
A mid-sized technology firm, Tech Innovators, faced challenges with its SG&A to Revenue Ratio, which had climbed to 22%. This situation strained profitability and limited investments in product development. Recognizing the need for change, the CFO initiated a comprehensive review of SG&A expenses, focusing on aligning costs with revenue generation.
The team identified key areas for improvement, including streamlining marketing expenditures and optimizing administrative functions. By reallocating resources towards high-impact sales initiatives and reducing unnecessary overhead, the company aimed to enhance its operational efficiency. Additionally, they implemented a new reporting dashboard to track the SG&A to Revenue Ratio in real-time, facilitating better management reporting and variance analysis.
Within a year, Tech Innovators successfully reduced its ratio to 18%, freeing up significant capital for innovation projects. This shift not only improved financial health but also positioned the company for sustainable growth. The success of this initiative underscored the importance of maintaining a keen focus on cost control metrics and strategic alignment with revenue objectives.
You can't improve what you don't measure.
Unlock smarter decisions with instant access to 20,000+ KPIs and 10,000+ benchmarks.
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot (formerly the Flevy KPI Library) is a comprehensive, fully searchable database of over 20,000+ KPIs and 10,000+ benchmarks. Each KPI is documented with 12 practical attributes that take you from definition to real-world application (definition, business insights, measurement approach, formula, trend analysis, diagnostics, tips, visualization ideas, risk warnings, tools & tech, integration points, and change impact).
KPI categories span every major corporate function and more than 150+ industries, giving executives, analysts, and consultants an instant, plug-and-play reference for building scorecards, dashboards, and data-driven strategies.
Our team is constantly expanding our KPI database and benchmarks database.
Got a question? Email us at support@kpidepot.com.
What is a good SG&A to Revenue Ratio?
A good SG&A to Revenue Ratio typically falls below 20%. However, this can vary by industry, so benchmarking against peers is essential for context.
How can I calculate the SG&A to Revenue Ratio?
To calculate the SG&A to Revenue Ratio, divide total SG&A expenses by total revenue and multiply by 100. This will give you a percentage that reflects your operational efficiency.
Why is this KPI important?
This KPI is crucial because it highlights how effectively a company manages its operational costs relative to revenue. A lower ratio indicates better cost control and improved profitability.
How often should I review this KPI?
Regular reviews, ideally quarterly, help ensure that SG&A expenses align with revenue growth. Frequent monitoring allows for timely adjustments and strategic alignment.
Can this ratio indicate financial health?
Yes, the SG&A to Revenue Ratio is a key financial ratio that reflects a company's operational efficiency. A lower ratio often correlates with stronger financial health and profitability.
What actions can reduce a high SG&A to Revenue Ratio?
Actions such as automating processes, optimizing marketing spend, and enhancing sales training can effectively reduce a high SG&A to Revenue Ratio. Focused cost control measures are essential for improvement.
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 12 attributes.
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected