The Staff Advocacy Index measures employee engagement and loyalty, serving as a leading indicator of organizational health.
High scores correlate with improved retention rates, enhanced productivity, and stronger financial health.
Companies with engaged employees often see better customer satisfaction and lower turnover costs.
This KPI provides actionable insights for management reporting and strategic alignment, enabling data-driven decisions that foster a positive workplace culture.
By tracking this metric, organizations can benchmark their performance against industry standards and identify areas for improvement.
Ultimately, a robust Staff Advocacy Index can drive significant business outcomes and improve ROI metrics.
High values indicate strong employee advocacy and satisfaction, suggesting a positive workplace culture. Conversely, low values may reveal disengagement, high turnover, or operational inefficiencies. Ideal targets typically exceed 80%, signaling a thriving organization.
We have 16 relevant benchmarks in our benchmarks database.
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | Q1 2025 | employees | Retail | over 500,000 employee responses |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | Q1 2025 | employees | Government | over 500,000 employee responses |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | Q1 2025 | employees | Construction | over 500,000 employee responses |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | Q1 2025 | employees | Manufacturing | over 500,000 employee responses |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | Q1 2025 | employees | Health | over 500,000 employee responses |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | Q1 2025 | employees | Housing Associations | over 500,000 employee responses |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | Q1 2025 | employees | Technology | over 500,000 employee responses |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | Q1 2025 | employees | Professional Services | over 500,000 employee responses |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | Q1 2025 | employees | Hospitality | over 500,000 employee responses |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | threshold | Q1 2025 | employees | cross-industry | over 500,000 employee responses |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | eNPS | median | July 2025 | employees | Government Administration | Australia |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | eNPS | median | July 2024 to June 2025 | employees | Public Company | ~350 organizations |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | eNPS | median | July 2024 to June 2025 | employees | Government | ~80 organizations |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | eNPS | median | July 2024 to June 2025 | employees | All Industries (Global) | global | ~5k organizations |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | threshold | 2024 | employees | cross-industry |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | threshold | employees | cross-industry |
Many organizations overlook the nuances of employee sentiment, leading to misguided initiatives that fail to address root causes of disengagement.
Enhancing the Staff Advocacy Index requires targeted actions that foster engagement and address employee concerns effectively.
A mid-sized tech firm, Tech Innovations, faced challenges with employee retention and morale. Their Staff Advocacy Index had dipped to 62%, indicating significant disengagement among staff. This decline was impacting productivity and leading to increased turnover costs, prompting leadership to take action.
The company initiated a comprehensive engagement strategy, focusing on transparent communication and employee recognition. They implemented quarterly surveys to gather feedback and established a task force to address concerns. Additionally, they launched a recognition program that celebrated employee achievements monthly, fostering a sense of belonging and appreciation.
Within a year, Tech Innovations saw their Staff Advocacy Index rise to 78%. Employee turnover decreased by 25%, and productivity metrics improved significantly. The company also reported higher customer satisfaction scores, as engaged employees were more motivated to deliver exceptional service.
The success of this initiative not only improved the workplace culture but also enhanced the company's financial health. With a more engaged workforce, Tech Innovations was able to redirect resources towards innovation and growth, ultimately driving better business outcomes and a stronger ROI.
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.
The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.
When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.
Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.
Got a question? Email us at [email protected].
Several factors can impact the Staff Advocacy Index, including workplace culture, management practices, and employee recognition. Additionally, opportunities for professional development and clear communication also play significant roles.
Measuring the Staff Advocacy Index quarterly is advisable for most organizations. This frequency allows for timely adjustments to engagement strategies based on employee feedback and sentiment shifts.
Yes, a low Staff Advocacy Index can lead to decreased customer satisfaction. Disengaged employees may provide subpar service, negatively impacting customer experiences and loyalty.
Quick wins include implementing regular feedback mechanisms and enhancing recognition programs. Simple gestures, like acknowledging employee contributions, can significantly boost morale and advocacy.
Absolutely. The Staff Advocacy Index is crucial for remote teams, as it helps gauge engagement levels in a virtual environment. Regular check-ins and communication are essential for maintaining advocacy among remote employees.
Leadership plays a pivotal role in shaping the Staff Advocacy Index through their actions and communication. Demonstrating transparency, empathy, and commitment to employee well-being can significantly enhance advocacy levels.
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected
NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)