Supplier Compliance Assessment Coverage is vital for ensuring that suppliers meet regulatory and quality standards, directly impacting operational efficiency and risk management.
Effective tracking of compliance metrics leads to improved supplier relationships and enhances overall financial health.
Organizations that prioritize compliance can better align their supply chain strategies with business outcomes, reducing costs associated with non-compliance.
This KPI also serves as a key figure in management reporting, providing analytical insights that drive data-driven decision-making.
By measuring compliance, companies can forecast potential risks and improve their ROI metrics, ultimately leading to a more resilient supply chain.
High compliance assessment coverage indicates that suppliers are consistently meeting established standards, fostering trust and reliability. Conversely, low coverage may reveal gaps in supplier performance or oversight, potentially leading to increased costs or operational disruptions. Ideal targets should aim for 90% or higher compliance to ensure robust supplier relationships and mitigate risks.
We have 12 relevant benchmark(s) in our benchmarks database.
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | mixed | 2020 | third-party relationships | cross-industry | trended countries | 1,794 survey respondents in 16 countries |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | mixed | 2020 | third-party relationships | cross-industry | U.S. | 1,794 survey respondents in 16 countries |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | mixed | 2020 | third-party relationships | cross-industry | Singapore | 1,794 survey respondents in 16 countries |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | mixed | 2020 | third-party relationships | automobile parts/industrial engineering | 1,794 survey respondents in 16 countries |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | mixed | 2020 | third-party relationships | TMT | 1,794 survey respondents in 16 countries |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | mixed | 2020 | third-party relationships | financial services | 1,794 survey respondents in 16 countries |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | mixed | 2020 | third-party relationships | industrials | 1,794 survey respondents in 16 countries |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | mixed | 2020 | third-party relationships | construction | 1,794 survey respondents in 16 countries |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | mixed | 2020 | third-party relationships | healthcare | 1,794 survey respondents in 16 countries |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | large corporations | 2020 | third-party relationships | cross-industry | global | 1,794 survey respondents in 16 countries |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | SMEs | 2020 | third-party relationships | cross-industry | global | 1,794 survey respondents in 16 countries |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | average | mixed | August–September 2016 | suppliers, distributors, and third party relationships | cross-industry | global | 1,132 global third party relationship/risk management/compli |
Many organizations underestimate the importance of supplier compliance, leading to costly oversights and reputational damage.
Enhancing supplier compliance requires a proactive approach to monitoring and engagement.
A leading electronics manufacturer faced challenges with supplier compliance, resulting in increased costs and delays in product delivery. The company found that its compliance assessment coverage was only at 65%, leading to frequent quality issues and strained supplier relationships. To address this, the CFO initiated a comprehensive supplier compliance program aimed at improving oversight and engagement.
The program included implementing a new compliance tracking system that provided real-time data on supplier performance. Additionally, the company organized workshops to educate suppliers on compliance standards and expectations. This collaborative approach fostered a culture of accountability and transparency among suppliers.
Within a year, compliance assessment coverage improved to 88%, significantly reducing quality issues and enhancing supplier relationships. The manufacturer also reported a 20% decrease in costs associated with non-compliance, freeing up resources for innovation and growth. The success of this initiative not only improved operational efficiency but also positioned the company as a leader in supplier compliance within its industry.
You can't improve what you don't measure.
Unlock smarter decisions with instant access to 20,000+ KPIs and 10,000+ benchmarks.
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot (formerly the Flevy KPI Library) is a comprehensive, fully searchable database of over 20,000+ KPIs and 10,000+ benchmarks. Each KPI is documented with 12 practical attributes that take you from definition to real-world application (definition, business insights, measurement approach, formula, trend analysis, diagnostics, tips, visualization ideas, risk warnings, tools & tech, integration points, and change impact).
KPI categories span every major corporate function and more than 150+ industries, giving executives, analysts, and consultants an instant, plug-and-play reference for building scorecards, dashboards, and data-driven strategies.
Our team is constantly expanding our KPI database and benchmarks database.
Got a question? Email us at support@kpidepot.com.
What is the significance of supplier compliance assessment coverage?
Supplier compliance assessment coverage is crucial for minimizing risks and ensuring that suppliers meet established standards. High coverage rates contribute to operational efficiency and enhance overall business outcomes.
How can organizations improve their compliance coverage?
Organizations can improve compliance coverage by implementing regular training for suppliers and utilizing technology for tracking. Establishing clear criteria and maintaining open communication are also essential.
What are the consequences of low compliance coverage?
Low compliance coverage can lead to increased costs, operational disruptions, and reputational damage. It may also result in regulatory penalties and strained supplier relationships.
How often should compliance assessments be conducted?
Compliance assessments should be conducted regularly, ideally quarterly or bi-annually. This frequency allows organizations to identify issues promptly and maintain strong supplier relationships.
Can technology help in compliance tracking?
Yes, technology can significantly enhance compliance tracking through automation and real-time reporting. A robust reporting dashboard provides valuable insights into supplier performance and compliance status.
What role does supplier feedback play in compliance?
Supplier feedback is essential for identifying compliance gaps and fostering collaboration. Engaging suppliers in the compliance process encourages accountability and improves overall performance.
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 12 attributes.
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected