Supplier Security Incident Rate is a critical KPI that measures the frequency of security breaches involving suppliers.
High incident rates can lead to significant financial losses, reputational damage, and operational disruptions.
This metric influences business outcomes such as supplier reliability, risk management, and overall operational efficiency.
By closely monitoring this rate, organizations can enhance their risk mitigation strategies and improve their supplier management processes.
A lower incident rate indicates effective security controls and stronger supplier relationships, while a higher rate signals potential vulnerabilities that need addressing.
Ultimately, this KPI supports strategic alignment and informed decision-making across the organization.
A high Supplier Security Incident Rate indicates frequent security breaches, which can jeopardize the entire supply chain. Conversely, a low rate reflects strong supplier security practices and effective risk management. Ideal targets typically fall below 1 incident per 100 suppliers annually, signaling robust security measures.
We have 9 relevant benchmarks in our benchmarks database.
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent of companies | percentage | last 12 months (2021) | companies reporting a third-party security incident | cross-industry | multiple geographies |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent of companies | percentage | last 12 months (2022) | companies reporting a third-party security incident | cross-industry | multiple geographies |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent of companies | percentage | last 12 months (2023) | companies reporting a third-party security incident | cross-industry | multiple geographies |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent of companies | percentage | last 12 months (2024 study year) | companies reporting a third-party security incident | cross-industry | multiple geographies |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | incidents per 24 months | average | Enterprise (10,000 or more employees) | past 24 months | third-party-related IT security incidents (attacks or breach | cross-industry | U.S. | 209 respondents |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | incidents per 24 months | average | Large (1,000 to 9,999 employees) | past 24 months | third-party-related IT security incidents (attacks or breach | cross-industry | U.S. | 209 respondents |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | incidents per 24 months | average | Medium (100 to 999 employees) | past 24 months | third-party-related IT security incidents (attacks or breach | cross-industry | U.S. | 209 respondents |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | incidents per 24 months | average | Small (1 to 99 employees) | past 24 months | third-party-related IT security incidents (attacks or breach | cross-industry | U.S. | 209 respondents |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | incidents per 24 months | average | Overall Average | past 24 months | third-party-related IT security incidents (attacks or breach | cross-industry | U.S. | 209 respondents |
Many organizations underestimate the impact of supplier security incidents on overall business health.
Enhancing supplier security requires a proactive approach to risk management and collaboration with suppliers.
A leading global electronics manufacturer faced increasing Supplier Security Incident Rates, with breaches affecting key supply chain operations. Over a year, incidents surged to 5 per 100 suppliers, prompting concerns about data integrity and customer trust. The company recognized that these incidents were not only damaging its reputation but also impacting financial performance due to disrupted production schedules and increased costs.
In response, the manufacturer launched a comprehensive Supplier Security Initiative, led by the Chief Risk Officer. This initiative involved conducting thorough security assessments of all suppliers, focusing on those with the highest risk profiles. The company also implemented mandatory training sessions for suppliers, emphasizing the importance of cybersecurity and best practices. Additionally, a new reporting dashboard was created to track incident rates and monitor compliance in real time.
Within 6 months, the Supplier Security Incident Rate dropped to 2 incidents per 100 suppliers. The initiative not only improved security but also strengthened supplier relationships, as partners appreciated the collaborative approach. The manufacturer reported a significant reduction in production delays and associated costs, leading to enhanced operational efficiency and improved ROI metrics.
By the end of the fiscal year, the company had regained customer confidence and positioned itself as a leader in supply chain security. The success of the Supplier Security Initiative also led to the establishment of a KPI framework that integrated supplier security metrics into overall business intelligence efforts, ensuring ongoing focus and improvement in this critical area.
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.
The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.
When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.
Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.
Got a question? Email us at [email protected].
A Supplier Security Incident refers to any breach or compromise of data or systems involving a supplier. These incidents can include unauthorized access, data leaks, or cyberattacks that impact the organization’s supply chain.
Regular reviews should occur at least quarterly to ensure timely identification of trends or issues. More frequent monitoring may be necessary during periods of heightened risk or after significant incidents.
A high incident rate can lead to financial losses, reputational damage, and operational disruptions. It may also result in increased scrutiny from regulators and stakeholders, affecting overall business health.
Yes, implementing advanced technologies such as AI and machine learning can enhance threat detection and response capabilities. These tools can help identify vulnerabilities and automate security assessments, improving overall supplier security.
Suppliers are critical partners in managing security incidents. Their adherence to security protocols and willingness to collaborate on incident response plans can significantly mitigate risks and enhance overall security posture.
Organizations can encourage suppliers to prioritize security by establishing clear expectations in contracts and providing training resources. Regular communication and collaboration can also foster a culture of security awareness among suppliers.
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected
NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)