Surface Water Usage is a critical KPI that reflects an organization's commitment to sustainability and operational efficiency.
It influences business outcomes such as cost control, regulatory compliance, and resource allocation.
By tracking this metric, companies can identify inefficiencies, optimize resource use, and enhance financial health.
Effective management reporting on water usage can lead to improved forecasting accuracy and strategic alignment with environmental goals.
Organizations that excel in this area often see a positive impact on their ROI metrics and overall business intelligence.
A focus on this KPI can also enhance stakeholder trust and brand reputation.
High values of Surface Water Usage may indicate inefficiencies in resource management or excessive consumption, while low values suggest effective conservation practices. Ideal targets should align with industry benchmarks and sustainability goals.
We have 13 relevant benchmarks in our benchmarks database.
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | percentage | 2017 | public-supply water withdrawals | public supply | Puerto Rico |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | Mgal/d | total | 2017 | public-supply water withdrawals | public supply | Puerto Rico |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | Mgal/d | total | 2015 | fresh surface-water withdrawals | all categories | Puerto Rico |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | percentage | 2015 | public-supply water withdrawals | public supply | Puerto Rico |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percentage | 1985–2010 | total withdrawals | all uses | Upper Colorado River Basin |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percentage | 1985–2010 | total withdrawals | all uses | Colorado River Basin |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | percentage | 2015 | fresh surface-water withdrawals for all uses | all categories | United States |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | percentage | 2015 | thermoelectric-power withdrawals | thermoelectric power | United States |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | percentage | 2015 | self-supplied industrial withdrawals | industrial | United States |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | percentage | 2015 | aquaculture withdrawals | aquaculture | United States |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | percentage | 2015 | irrigation withdrawals | irrigation | United States |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | percentage | 2015 | public-supply withdrawals | public supply | United States |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | Bgal/d | total | 2015 | fresh surface-water withdrawals | all categories | United States |
Many organizations underestimate the importance of accurate tracking in Surface Water Usage, leading to misguided strategies and wasted resources.
Enhancing Surface Water Usage metrics requires a multi-faceted approach focused on efficiency and engagement.
A leading beverage manufacturer faced increasing scrutiny over its water usage, which had reached unsustainable levels. With a commitment to sustainability, the company initiated a comprehensive review of its Surface Water Usage metrics. They discovered that outdated equipment and inefficient processes were contributing to excessive consumption, tying up valuable resources and impacting their bottom line.
The company launched a project called “WaterWise,” aimed at reducing water usage by 25% over 2 years. They implemented state-of-the-art metering systems to monitor usage in real time, allowing them to pinpoint inefficiencies quickly. Additionally, they engaged employees through training programs that emphasized the importance of water conservation and provided actionable strategies for reducing waste.
Within the first year, WaterWise resulted in a 15% reduction in water usage, translating to significant cost savings and improved operational efficiency. The company also enhanced its brand reputation by publicly committing to sustainability goals, appealing to environmentally conscious consumers. By the end of the second year, they achieved their target of a 25% reduction, positioning themselves as a leader in sustainable practices within the industry.
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.
The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.
When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.
Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.
Got a question? Email us at [email protected].
Tracking Surface Water Usage is essential for understanding resource efficiency and identifying areas for improvement. It also helps organizations align with sustainability goals and regulatory requirements.
Organizations can enhance water efficiency by implementing real-time monitoring systems and investing in water-saving technologies. Engaging employees in conservation efforts also plays a crucial role in achieving better results.
High water usage can lead to increased operational costs and potential regulatory penalties. It may also damage a company's reputation, especially in industries where sustainability is a priority.
Regular reviews, ideally quarterly, help organizations stay on track with their conservation goals. Frequent assessments allow for timely adjustments and better decision-making.
Employee engagement is vital for successful water conservation initiatives. When staff are informed and motivated, they are more likely to adopt sustainable practices and contribute to overall improvements.
Yes, technology plays a significant role in reducing water usage. Advanced metering systems and water-efficient equipment can lead to substantial savings and improved operational efficiency.
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected
NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)