Time to Resolve Disputes KPI

What is Time to Resolve Disputes?
The average time required to resolve an invoice dispute, reflecting the efficiency of customer service and dispute management.

View Benchmarks




Time to Resolve Disputes is a critical KPI that directly impacts cash flow and customer satisfaction.

A shorter resolution time enhances operational efficiency, leading to improved financial health and customer loyalty.

Companies that excel in this metric often see reduced costs associated with disputes and increased ROI.

By focusing on this performance indicator, organizations can streamline their processes and enhance strategic alignment across departments.

This KPI serves as a key figure in management reporting, allowing executives to make data-driven decisions that drive business outcomes.

Ultimately, improving this metric can lead to significant competitive positioning in the market.

Time to Resolve Disputes Interpretation

High values indicate inefficiencies in dispute resolution, potentially leading to customer dissatisfaction and cash flow issues. Conversely, low values reflect effective processes and strong customer relationships. Ideal targets typically fall below 30 days for most industries.

  • <15 days – Exemplary performance; indicates robust processes
  • 16–30 days – Acceptable; requires monitoring for potential issues
  • >30 days – Concerning; necessitates immediate investigation

Time to Resolve Disputes Benchmarks

We have 25 relevant benchmarks in our benchmarks database.

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only calendar days threshold Directive 2013/11/EU consumer disputes submitted to ADR entities cross-industry European Union

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent percentage 2013-2016 LCIA cases with amounts in dispute under USD 1 million 224 cases

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only months median 2013-2016 LCIA cases with amounts in dispute under USD 1 million 224 cases

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only months average 2013-2016 LCIA cases 224 cases

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only days threshold Emergency Arbitrator applications

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent percentage since 2017 final awards rendered under the Expedited Procedure Provisio 341 final awards

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only months median 2023 cases that concluded by way of final award

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only months average 2023 cases that concluded by way of final award

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent distribution three-arbitrator cases under the SCC Arbitration Rules 80 arbitral awards

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent distribution sole arbitrator cases under the SCC Arbitration Rules 80 arbitral awards

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only months median cases reviewed under the SCC Arbitration Rules 80 arbitral awards

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only months median cases reviewed under the SCC Arbitration Rules 80 arbitral awards

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only months median cases reviewed under the SCC Arbitration Rules 80 arbitral awards

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only months median disputes decided under the SCC Rules for Expedited Arbitrati

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent percentage 2023 final awards in cases administered under the SCC Rules for E

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent percentage 2015-2022 cases under the SCC Arbitration Rules 221 qualifying arbitral awards

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent distribution 2015-2022 three-arbitrator cases under the SCC Arbitration Rules 221 qualifying arbitral awards

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent distribution 2015-2022 sole arbitrator cases under the SCC Arbitration Rules 221 qualifying arbitral awards

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only percent percentage 2023 arbitral awards under the SCC Arbitration Rules

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only months mean 2015-2022 qualifying arbitral awards under the SCC Arbitration Rules 221 qualifying arbitral awards

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only months mean 2015-2022 qualifying arbitral awards under the SCC Arbitration Rules 221 qualifying arbitral awards

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only months mean 2015-2022 qualifying arbitral awards under the SCC Arbitration Rules 221 qualifying arbitral awards

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only months median 2015-2022 qualifying arbitral awards under the SCC Arbitration Rules 221 qualifying arbitral awards

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only months median 2015-2022 qualifying arbitral awards under the SCC Arbitration Rules 221 qualifying arbitral awards

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Source: Subscribers only

Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only

Additional Comments: Subscribers only

Value Unit Type Company Size Time Period Population Industry Geography Sample Size
Subscribers only months median 2015-2022 qualifying arbitral awards under the SCC Arbitration Rules 221 qualifying arbitral awards

Unlock this benchmark, plus all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks with full values, formulas, and citations.

Compare KPI Depot Plans Login

Common Pitfalls

Many organizations underestimate the complexity of dispute resolution, leading to systemic inefficiencies that can erode customer trust.

  • Failing to standardize dispute resolution processes can create confusion among teams. Without clear guidelines, employees may handle disputes inconsistently, prolonging resolution times and frustrating customers.
  • Neglecting to invest in training for dispute resolution teams results in skill gaps. Employees may lack the necessary tools and techniques to resolve issues efficiently, leading to increased resolution times.
  • Overlooking the importance of customer communication during disputes can exacerbate tensions. Keeping customers informed about the status of their issues fosters trust and can lead to quicker resolutions.
  • Relying solely on manual processes can slow down dispute resolution. Automation and technology can streamline workflows, reducing the time taken to resolve disputes significantly.

KPI Depot is trusted by consulting, strategy, finance, and analytics teams at leading organizations worldwide, including those listed below.

AAMC Accenture AXA Bristol Myers Squibb Capgemini DBS Bank Dell Delta Emirates Global Aluminum EY GSK GlaskoSmithKline Honeywell IBM Mitre Northrup Grumman Novo Nordisk NTT Data PepsiCo Samsung Suntory TCS Tata Consultancy Services Vodafone

Improvement Levers

Enhancing the Time to Resolve Disputes requires a multifaceted approach focused on efficiency and customer engagement.

  • Implement a centralized dispute management system to track and manage disputes effectively. This system can provide real-time insights and streamline communication between departments, reducing resolution times.
  • Invest in training programs for staff involved in dispute resolution. Equipping employees with the right skills and knowledge can lead to quicker, more effective resolutions.
  • Utilize data analytics to identify common dispute triggers. By understanding the root causes, organizations can proactively address issues before they escalate into disputes.
  • Enhance customer communication throughout the dispute process. Regular updates can reassure customers and help manage expectations, leading to faster resolutions.

Time to Resolve Disputes Case Study Example

A leading telecommunications provider faced a significant challenge with its Time to Resolve Disputes, which averaged 45 days. This prolonged resolution period strained customer relationships and negatively impacted cash flow. The company initiated a comprehensive review of its dispute resolution processes, identifying key bottlenecks in communication and workflow.

The provider implemented a new digital platform that centralized all dispute-related information, allowing teams to collaborate more effectively. Additionally, they introduced a training program focused on best practices for dispute resolution, ensuring that employees were equipped to handle issues swiftly.

Within 6 months, the average resolution time dropped to 20 days, significantly improving customer satisfaction scores. The streamlined process not only enhanced operational efficiency but also reduced costs associated with prolonged disputes. The company was able to reinvest the savings into customer service enhancements, further solidifying its market position.

Related KPIs


What is the standard formula?
Average Time to Resolve Invoice Disputes


Unlock all 35,625 source-attributed benchmarks.
Comparable benchmark data services start at $2,400 per year.
See all 25 benchmarks for Time to Resolve Disputes
Access to 35,625 benchmarks
Access to 24,181 KPIs
Interactive Strategy Maps on every plan
13 attributes per KPI (view)

Compare Plans

KPI Categories

This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:



KPI Depot takes you from KPI intelligence to finished deliverable. Consultants, strategy teams, FP&A leaders, and analytics teams use it to answer the two hardest questions in performance management, what to measure and what the target should be, and then to produce the scorecard itself.

The difference is intelligence, not just data. Anyone can list metrics. Every KPI in KPI Depot carries 13 practical attributes, from formula and measurement approach to diagnostic questions, risk warnings, and Balanced Scorecard perspective, across 15 corporate functions and 153 industries. And every target you set is grounded in our database of 34,304 source-attributed benchmarks, each detailing metric value, company size, time period, industry, geography, sample size, and source. Benchmark data at this scale is otherwise the domain of research services costing thousands to hundreds of thousands of dollars per year.

When your metrics are selected, KPI Depot finishes the job: export an interactive Strategy Map, a Balanced Scorecard with formulas and tracking columns, or a CSV KPI pack, and go from research to working deliverable in hours instead of weeks.

Formerly the Flevy KPI Library, KPI Depot is trusted by teams at organizations including Accenture, EY, IBM, PepsiCo, Samsung, and Vodafone.

Got a question? Email us at [email protected].

FAQs about Time to Resolve Disputes

What factors influence the Time to Resolve Disputes?

Several factors can affect this KPI, including the complexity of the dispute, the efficiency of internal processes, and the level of communication with customers. Organizations must analyze these elements to identify areas for improvement.

How can technology improve dispute resolution times?

Technology can streamline workflows by automating routine tasks and providing real-time data access. This reduces manual errors and accelerates the resolution process, ultimately enhancing customer satisfaction.

Is it possible to measure the financial impact of dispute resolution times?

Yes. By analyzing the correlation between resolution times and customer retention rates, organizations can quantify the financial implications. Shorter resolution times often lead to higher customer loyalty and increased revenue.

How often should organizations review their dispute resolution processes?

Regular reviews, ideally quarterly, help organizations stay ahead of potential issues. Continuous improvement ensures that processes remain efficient and responsive to changing customer needs.

Can customer feedback influence dispute resolution strategies?

Absolutely. Gathering and analyzing customer feedback can provide valuable insights into common pain points. This information can guide process improvements and enhance overall customer experience.

What role does employee training play in dispute resolution?

Employee training is crucial for equipping staff with the skills needed to resolve disputes effectively. Well-trained employees can handle issues more efficiently, leading to shorter resolution times and improved customer satisfaction.



Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 13 attributes.

KPI Definition

A clear explanation of what the KPI measures

Potential Business Insights

The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI

Measurement Approach

An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI

Standard Formula

The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI

Trend Analysis

Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts

Diagnostic Questions

Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve

Actionable Tips

Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions

Visualization Suggestions

Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making

Risk Warnings

Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention

Tools & Technologies

Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively

Integration Points

How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management

Change Impact

Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected

BSC Perspective

NEW Mapping to a Balanced Scorecard perspective (financial, customer, internal process, learning & growth)


Compare Our Plans


Explore KPI Depot by Function & Industry