Total Water Usage is a critical KPI that reflects an organization's operational efficiency and sustainability efforts.
By monitoring this metric, companies can identify areas for cost control and resource optimization, ultimately influencing financial health and environmental impact.
Effective management of water usage can lead to significant cost savings, improved ROI, and enhanced corporate reputation.
Organizations that prioritize this KPI can align their strategies with sustainability goals while ensuring compliance with regulations.
Tracking water usage also provides valuable data-driven insights for forecasting and strategic planning.
High values of Total Water Usage indicate inefficiencies in resource management, potentially leading to increased operational costs and environmental concerns. Conversely, low values suggest effective water conservation practices and operational efficiency. Ideal targets vary by industry, but organizations should aim to minimize usage without compromising productivity.
We have 40 relevant benchmark(s) in our benchmarks database.
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | tickets per day | average | day | support tickets | across industries |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | range | monthly volumes | ticket backlog as a percentage of monthly volumes |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | tickets per seat per month | range | desktop support tickets per seat | equipment manufacturing and High Tech |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | tickets per technician per month | average, min, max | desktop support tickets per technician | financial services |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | tickets per technician per month | average, min, max | desktop support tickets per technician | high tech |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | tickets per technician per month | average, min, max | desktop support tickets per technician | equipment manufacturing |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | tickets per technician per month | average, min, max | desktop support tickets per technician | telecommunications |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | tickets per technician per month | average, min, max | desktop support tickets per technician | business services |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | tickets per technician per month | average, min, max | desktop support tickets per technician | healthcare |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | tickets per technician per month | average, min, max | desktop support tickets per technician | energy utilities |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | tickets per technician | benchmark ratio | help desk tickets per technician |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | tickets per day | average | day | support tickets | across industries |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | range | monthly volumes | ticket backlog as a percentage of monthly volumes |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Formula: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | tickets per seat per month | range | desktop support tickets per seat | equipment manufacturing and High Tech |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | tickets per technician per month | average, min, max | desktop support tickets per technician | financial services |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | tickets per technician per month | average, min, max | desktop support tickets per technician | high tech |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | tickets per technician per month | average, min, max | desktop support tickets per technician | equipment manufacturing |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | tickets per technician per month | average, min, max | desktop support tickets per technician | telecommunications |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | tickets per technician per month | average, min, max | desktop support tickets per technician | business services |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | tickets per technician per month | average, min, max | desktop support tickets per technician | healthcare |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | tickets per technician per month | average, min, max | desktop support tickets per technician | energy utilities |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | tickets per technician | benchmark ratio | help desk tickets per technician |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | gal/ft²/year | percentiles | calendar year 2019 | properties | College/University | United States | 590 properties |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | gal/ft²/year | percentiles | calendar year 2019 | properties | Fire Station | United States | 126 properties |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | gal/ft²/year | percentiles | calendar year 2019 | properties | Hospital (General Medical & Surgical) | United States | 347 properties |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | gal/ft²/year | percentiles | calendar year 2019 | properties | Hotel | United States | 1,488 properties |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | gal/ft²/year | percentiles | calendar year 2019 | properties | K-12 School (includes Preschool/Daycare) | United States | 1,588 properties |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | gal/ft²/year | percentiles | calendar year 2019 | properties | Medical Offices (includes Urgent Care/Clinic/Other Outpatien | United States | 1,177 properties |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | gal/ft²/year | percentiles | properties | Multifamily | United States | 258 properties |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | gal/ft²/year | percentiles | calendar year 2019 | properties | Non-Refrigerated Warehouse (includes Self-Storage Facility a | United States | 1,675 properties |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | gal/ft²/year | percentiles | calendar year 2019 | properties | Office (includes Bank Branch/Financial Office/Other Offices) | United States | 9,627 properties |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | gal/ft²/year | percentiles | calendar year 2019 | properties | Retail Store | United States | 4,382 properties |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | gal/ft²/year | percentiles | calendar year 2019 | properties | Senior Living Community | United States | 1,232 properties |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | gal/ft²/year | percentiles | calendar year 2019 | properties | Supermarket (includes Grocery Store, Wholesale Club and Supe | United States | 432 properties |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | gal/bed/day | percentiles | 2006–2012 | beds | Hospital | United States |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | gal/worker/day | percentiles | 2006–2012 | workers | Office | United States |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | gal/room/day | percentiles | 2006–2012 | rooms | Hotel | United States |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | gal/ft²/year and gal/unit/day | median and percentiles | 2011 | multifamily properties | Multifamily housing | United States | 458 properties |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | gal/ft² | median and range | calendar year 2014 | properties | Cambridge | 441 properties |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | m³/m²/year | average | 2008 and 2014 | BOMA BESt certified buildings | commercial buildings | Canada |
Many organizations overlook the importance of accurate water usage tracking, leading to inflated consumption figures that distort operational assessments.
Enhancing Total Water Usage metrics requires a proactive approach to resource management and employee engagement.
A manufacturing company, specializing in consumer goods, faced rising operational costs due to excessive water usage. Over a two-year period, their Total Water Usage had increased by 30%, straining budgets and raising environmental concerns. Recognizing the urgency, the executive team initiated a comprehensive water management program aimed at reducing consumption by 20% within 18 months.
The program included the installation of smart water meters across all facilities, enabling real-time monitoring of usage patterns. Additionally, the company launched an employee engagement campaign, encouraging staff to adopt water-saving practices. Regular workshops and incentives for innovative ideas further fostered a culture of sustainability.
Within the first year, the company achieved a 15% reduction in water usage, translating to significant cost savings. The data collected from smart meters allowed for targeted interventions, such as fixing leaks and optimizing processes. As a result, the company not only improved its bottom line but also enhanced its reputation as a responsible corporate citizen.
By the end of the initiative, the company successfully reduced its Total Water Usage by 25%, surpassing its original goal. This achievement not only improved operational efficiency but also positioned the company favorably in the eyes of stakeholders concerned with environmental impact. The success of the program demonstrated the value of a strategic approach to resource management and its alignment with broader business objectives.
You can't improve what you don't measure.
Unlock smarter decisions with instant access to 20,000+ KPIs and 10,000+ benchmarks.
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot (formerly the Flevy KPI Library) is a comprehensive, fully searchable database of over 20,000+ KPIs and 10,000+ benchmarks. Each KPI is documented with 12 practical attributes that take you from definition to real-world application (definition, business insights, measurement approach, formula, trend analysis, diagnostics, tips, visualization ideas, risk warnings, tools & tech, integration points, and change impact).
KPI categories span every major corporate function and more than 150+ industries, giving executives, analysts, and consultants an instant, plug-and-play reference for building scorecards, dashboards, and data-driven strategies.
Our team is constantly expanding our KPI database and benchmarks database.
Got a question? Email us at support@kpidepot.com.
Why is tracking Total Water Usage important?
Tracking Total Water Usage helps organizations identify inefficiencies and reduce costs. It also supports sustainability initiatives and regulatory compliance.
How can companies reduce their water usage?
Companies can reduce water usage by implementing advanced metering, conducting audits, and investing in water-efficient technologies. Engaging employees in conservation efforts also plays a crucial role.
What industries typically have high water usage?
Industries such as manufacturing, agriculture, and hospitality often have high water usage due to their operational needs. Understanding industry benchmarks can help set realistic targets.
How often should water usage be reviewed?
Regular reviews, ideally on a monthly basis, are essential for identifying trends and making informed decisions. Frequent assessments allow for timely interventions when usage spikes occur.
What role does employee engagement play in water conservation?
Employee engagement is vital for fostering a culture of sustainability. When staff are aware of their impact on water usage, they are more likely to adopt conservation practices.
Can technology help in managing water usage?
Yes, technology such as smart meters and data analytics tools can provide valuable insights into water consumption patterns. These tools enable organizations to make data-driven decisions for improvement.
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 12 attributes.
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected