Noise Pollution Reduction Measures are critical for enhancing urban living conditions and improving public health outcomes.
Effective management of noise pollution can lead to increased property values and enhanced community satisfaction.
By implementing targeted strategies, organizations can achieve significant operational efficiency and cost savings.
This KPI serves as a leading indicator for assessing environmental impact and compliance with regulations.
Tracking noise levels can also improve strategic alignment with sustainability goals, ultimately driving better financial health for municipalities and businesses alike.
High values of noise pollution indicate a detrimental impact on community well-being and can lead to regulatory scrutiny. Conversely, low values reflect effective management practices and a commitment to public health. Ideal targets should align with local regulations and community standards for acceptable noise levels.
We have 10 relevant benchmark(s) in our benchmarks database.
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | large hub, medium hub, small hub, non-hub, other | October 2018 | respondent airports | airport noise management | North America (U.S. and Canada) | 54 airports |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | large hub, medium hub, small hub, non-hub, other | October 2018 | respondent airports | airport noise management | North America (U.S. and Canada) | 54 airports |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | large hub, medium hub, small hub, non-hub, other | October 2018 | respondent airports | airport noise management | North America (U.S. and Canada) | 54 airports |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | large hub, medium hub, small hub, non-hub, other | October 2018 | respondent airports | airport noise management | North America (U.S. and Canada) | 54 airports |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | large hub, medium hub, small hub, non-hub, other | October 2018 | respondent airports | airport noise management | North America (U.S. and Canada) | 54 airports |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | share of respondents | large hub, medium hub, small hub, non-hub, other | October 2018 | respondent airports | airport noise management | North America (U.S. and Canada) | 54 airports |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | large hub, medium hub, small hub, non-hub, other | October 2018 | respondent airports | airport noise management | North America (U.S. and Canada) | 54 airports |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | large hub, medium hub, small hub, non-hub, other | October 2018 | respondent airports | airport noise management | North America (U.S. and Canada) | 54 airports |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent | large hub, medium hub, small hub, non-hub, other | October 2018 | respondent airports | airport noise management | North America (U.S. and Canada) | 54 airports |
Source: Subscribers only
Source Excerpt: Subscribers only
Additional Comments: Subscribers only
| Value | Unit | Type | Company Size | Time Period | Population | Industry | Geography | Sample Size |
| Subscribers only | percent of reported measures | 2019 reporting year | noise reduction measures in noise action plans for urban agg | environmental noise management | Europe (EU-28 and EEA-33 countries) | 188 agglomeration noise action plans |
Many organizations underestimate the long-term impacts of noise pollution, leading to ineffective measures that fail to address root causes.
Addressing noise pollution requires a multifaceted approach that combines technology, community engagement, and ongoing evaluation.
A mid-sized city, facing escalating noise complaints, decided to tackle the issue head-on. Noise pollution levels had reached a concerning average of 75 dB in key residential areas, prompting community unrest and potential legal challenges. The city council initiated a comprehensive “Quiet City” program, focusing on both technological and community-driven solutions.
The program included the installation of noise barriers along major highways, which significantly reduced sound transmission into neighborhoods. Additionally, the city implemented a real-time noise monitoring system that provided valuable data for variance analysis and informed decision-making. Community forums were held to gather feedback and foster collaboration, ensuring that residents felt heard and involved in the process.
Within a year, average noise levels dropped to 60 dB, leading to a noticeable improvement in community satisfaction. The city also reported a 15% increase in property values in previously affected areas, showcasing the tangible business outcomes of the initiative. The success of the “Quiet City” program not only enhanced residents' quality of life but also positioned the city as a leader in sustainable urban development.
You can't improve what you don't measure.
Unlock smarter decisions with instant access to 20,000+ KPIs and 10,000+ benchmarks.
This KPI is associated with the following categories and industries in our KPI database:
KPI Depot (formerly the Flevy KPI Library) is a comprehensive, fully searchable database of over 20,000+ KPIs and 10,000+ benchmarks. Each KPI is documented with 12 practical attributes that take you from definition to real-world application (definition, business insights, measurement approach, formula, trend analysis, diagnostics, tips, visualization ideas, risk warnings, tools & tech, integration points, and change impact).
KPI categories span every major corporate function and more than 150+ industries, giving executives, analysts, and consultants an instant, plug-and-play reference for building scorecards, dashboards, and data-driven strategies.
Our team is constantly expanding our KPI database and benchmarks database.
Got a question? Email us at support@kpidepot.com.
What are the main sources of noise pollution?
Common sources include traffic, construction, and industrial activities. Understanding these sources is essential for effective management and mitigation strategies.
How can noise pollution affect health?
Long-term exposure to high noise levels can lead to stress, sleep disturbances, and cardiovascular issues. Addressing noise pollution is crucial for promoting public health and well-being.
What technologies are available for noise monitoring?
Various sound level meters and monitoring systems can provide real-time data on noise levels. These technologies facilitate data-driven decision-making and help track results over time.
How often should noise levels be monitored?
Regular monitoring is recommended, especially in areas with fluctuating noise sources. Continuous data collection allows for timely interventions and adjustments to strategies.
Can community engagement improve noise management efforts?
Yes, involving the community in discussions about noise pollution can lead to more effective solutions. Feedback from residents helps tailor strategies to their specific needs and concerns.
What role do regulations play in managing noise pollution?
Regulations set acceptable noise thresholds and guide enforcement actions. Compliance with these regulations is essential for maintaining community standards and public health.
Each KPI in our knowledge base includes 12 attributes.
A clear explanation of what the KPI measures
The typical business insights we expect to gain through the tracking of this KPI
An outline of the approach or process followed to measure this KPI
The standard formula organizations use to calculate this KPI
Insights into how the KPI tends to evolve over time and what trends could indicate positive or negative performance shifts
Questions to ask to better understand your current position is for the KPI and how it can improve
Practical, actionable tips for improving the KPI, which might involve operational changes, strategic shifts, or tactical actions
Recommended charts or graphs that best represent the trends and patterns around the KPI for more effective reporting and decision-making
Potential risks or warnings signs that could indicate underlying issues that require immediate attention
Suggested tools, technologies, and software that can help in tracking and analyzing the KPI more effectively
How the KPI can be integrated with other business systems and processes for holistic strategic performance management
Explanation of how changes in the KPI can impact other KPIs and what kind of changes can be expected